LIMFFLOW STENT GRAFT SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 3023527320-2025-00003
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- March 26, 2025
- Date of Event
- February 26, 2025
- Report Date
- March 13, 2025
- Manufacturer
- LIMFLOW INC
- Product Code
- QWN
- PMA / PMN Number
- P220025
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- SC, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
THE DEVICE IDENTIFIERS WERE PROVIDED, AND THE LOT HISTORY RECORDS WERE REVIEWED. THERE WERE NO DISCREPANCIES OR UNUSUAL FINDINGS. THE DEVICE HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED. THERE HAVE BEEN NO SIMILAR COMPLAINT EVENTS FOR THIS LOT NUMBER. MANUFACTURER REFERENCE: (B)(4).
THE DEVICE (ARC) IDENTIFIERS WERE PROVIDED, AND THE LOT HISTORY RECORDS WERE REVIEWED BY CONFLUENT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES. THERE WERE NO DISCREPANCIES OR UNUSUAL FINDINGS. THERE HAVE BEEN NO SIMILAR COMPLAINT EVENTS FOR THIS LOT NUMBER. THE DEVICE HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER AND EVALUATED. EVALUATION OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE IDENTIFIED THE 150MM SGS APPEARED TO BE MOSTLY IN-TACT WITHOUT THE STENT. THE INNER POLYIMIDE WAS OBSERVED TO BE SLIGHTLY BENT. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THIS ISSUE CANNOT BE DETERMINED WITH THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT DEVICES WERE BENT WHILE IN USE, CAUSING TENSION IN THE SYSTEM, RESULTING IN INABILITY TO DEPLOY THE STENTS. HOWEVER, THIS CANNOT BE VERIFIED AS THE DEVICE ONLY DEMONSTRATED A SLIGHT BEND.
THE 2ND STENT USED IN THE PROCEDURE (150MM, LOT 900148) HAD ISSUES DEPLOYING ROUGHLY ABOUT 5 CM. IT WAS TRACKED TO THE LANDING POINT BELOW THE ANKLE. THE SYSTEM WAS IN A STRAIGHT CONFIGURATION. IT STARTED TO DEPLOY THEN IT STOPPED. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT WANT TO DEPLOY THE STENT MANUALLY AND TRIED TO REMOVE IT FROM THE PATIENT. THIS WAS UNSUCCESSFUL AS THE STENT ENDED UP DEPLOYING ABOVE THE ANASTOMOSIS. THE PHYSICIAN THEN DECIDED TO PERFORM TWO VASCULAR CUTDOWNS TO REMOVE THE STENT. THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH VIABAHN.
THE 2ND STENT USED IN THE PROCEDURE (150MM, LOT 900148) HAD ISSUES DEPLOYING ROUGHLY ABOUT 5 CM. IT WAS TRACKED TO THE LANDING POINT BELOW THE ANKLE. THE SYSTEM WAS IN A STRAIGHT CONFIGURATION. IT STARTED TO DEPLOY THEN IT STOPPED. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT WANT TO DEPLOY THE STENT MANUALLY AND TRIED TO REMOVE IT FROM THE PATIENT. THIS WAS UNSUCCESSFUL AS THE STENT ENDED UP DEPLOYING ABOVE THE ANASTOMOSIS. THE PHYSICIAN THEN DECIDED TO PERFORM TWO VASCULAR CUTDOWNS TO REMOVE THE STENT. THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH VIABAHN.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2100123 | LIMFFLOW STENT GRAFT SYSTEM | LIMFLOW SYSTEM, LIMFLOW CROSSING STENT GRAFT, LIMFLOW EXTENSION STENT GRAFT | QWN | LIMFLOW INC | SGH-55150-US-21 | 900148 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Female | Required Intervention |