OT PING METER
Report
- Report Number
- 2939301-2011-05332
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- June 28, 2011
- Report Date
- June 15, 2011
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN INC.
- Product Code
- NBW
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CT, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
FOLLOW-UP # 1 ((B)(6) 2011) - DEVICE EVALUATION: THE METER AND TEST STRIPS INVOLVED WITH THIS COMPLAINT HAS BEEN RETURNED AND EVALUATED BY PRODUCT ANALYSIS WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: ON (B)(6) 2011 THE METER PASSED ALL TESTING WITH NO FAULTS FOUND. ON (B)(6) 2011 THE TEST STRIPS WERE ALSO TESTED AND THE PRIMARY COMPLAINT WAS NOT CONFIRMED. IF LIFESCAN OBTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS COMPLAINT, A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED. AT THIS TIME, LIFESCAN CONSIDERS THIS MATTER CLOSED.
LIFESCAN (LFS) HAS REQUESTED RETURN OF THE SUBJECT PRODUCT(S) FOR EVALUATION. IF THE PRODUCT(S) ARE RETURNED, LFS WILL EVALUATE IT/THEM AND INFORM FDA OF PRODUCT(S) THAT DO NOT PASS INSPECTION IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT. 510(K) # IS K082590.
ON (B)(6) 2011, A REPORTER FOR THE LAY USER/ PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) ALLEGING THE PATIENT'S ONETOUCH PING METER READ INACCURATELY ERRATIC WHEN COMPARING RESULTS TAKEN ONE AFTER ANOTHER. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE ADVOCATE (CCA) DOCUMENTATION. THE ALLEGED ISSUE BEGAN ON THE MORNING OF (B)(6) (YEAR NOT SPECIFIED). THE REPORTER STATED THE PATIENT OBTAINED BLOOD GLUCOSE RESULTS OF "238 AND 69 MG/DL" WITH THE SUBJECT METER, PERFORMED WITHIN 20 MINUTES OF EACH OTHER. BASED ON STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, THE CALCULATED DIFFERENCE OF THESE GLUCOSE RESULTS EXCEEDS THE EXPECTED VALUE OF <=20% AND/ OR <=20 MG/DL. IT IS NOT KNOWN HOW THE PATIENT MANAGES HIS DIABETES OR WHAT ACTION HE TOOK AT THE TIME OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE. IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE START OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE, THE REPORTER CLAIMED THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING "MOOD CHANGES." THE REPORTER DENIED THE PATIENT RECEIVED MEDICAL TREATMENT. AT THE TIME OF TROUBLESHOOTING, THE CCA NOTED THE METER WAS SET TO THE CORRECT UNIT OF MEASUREMENT AND AN APPROVED SAMPLE SITE WAS USED FOR TESTING. THE PATIENT DID NOT HAVE CONTROL SOLUTION TO TEST THE SUBJECT METER AND TEST STRIPS. REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS WERE SENT TO THE PATIENT. THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT THE REPORTED ISSUE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO A SERIOUS INJURY SINCE THE PATIENT SYMPTOMS DID NOT CORRELATE WITH LFS'S DEFINITION SUGGESTIVE OF SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA OR HYPERGLYCEMIA, NOR RECEIVE MEDICAL INTERVENTION FOR EITHER OF THESE CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE SUBJECT METER DID NOT MEET LFS' ACCURACY CRITERIA.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OT PING METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN INC. | 3115218 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 YR |