UNKNOWN SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR
Report
- Report Number
- 3007566237-2011-04067
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- June 7, 2011
- Date of Event
- May 1, 2011
- Report Date
- June 1, 2011
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
- Product Code
- LGW
- PMA / PMN Number
- P840001
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- OH, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
(B)(4). IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ASCERTAIN SPECIFIC DEVICE INFO FROM THE ARTICLE OR TO MATCH THE EVENTS REPORTED WITH PREVIOUSLY REPORTED EVENTS.
LITERATURE: ANEJA S, TAYLOR JS, BILLINGS SD, HONARI G, SOOD A. POST-IMPLANTATION ERYTHEMA IN 3 PTS AND A REVIEW OF RETICULAR TELANGIECTATIC ERYTHEMA. CONTACT DERMATITIS. MAY 2011;64(5):280-288. SUMMARY: THE AUTHORS REVIEW THE APPEARANCE OF ERYTHEMATOUS, BLANCHABLE PATCHES OR PLAQUES OVERLYING AN IMPLANT AND SUGGEST POSSIBLE DIAGNOSIS OF RETICULAR TELANGIECTATIC ERYTHEMA (RTE). THE AUTHORS DEMONSTRATE THE CLINICAL PRESENTATION OF RTE OR SIMILAR PATCH TEST-NEGATIVE POST-IMPLANTATION ERYTHEMA. EVENT: THE AUTHORS REPORT ON A (B)(6) MALE (CASE 2) THAT PRESENTED WITH A 3-WEEK HISTORY OF WARM RETICULAR ERYTHEMATOUS PATCH OVER THE RIGHT SIDE OF HIS ABDOMEN. HE PREVIOUSLY HAD TWO METAL RODS, A SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR REPLACEMENT (T8-9) AND A PULSE GENERATOR IMPLANTED WITHOUT ANY CUTANEOUS COMPLICATIONS, 8 MONTHS EARLIER. HE DESCRIBED THE AFFECTED AREA AS INTERMITTENTLY ITCHY AND SWOLLEN, BUT DID NOT COMPLAIN OF ANY PAIN. THE PT WAS TREATED WITH CLINDAMYCIN 300 MG, AND NOTICED A TRANSIENT IMPROVEMENT IN REDNESS. A SKIN BIOPSY REVEALED SUPERFICIAL PERIVASCULAR AND INTERSTITIAL LYMPHOCYTIC INFILTRATE ASSOCIATED WITH SMUDGING OF THE DERMOEPIDERMAL JUNCTION AND THE PRESENCE OF A FEW DYSKERATOTIC KERATINOCYTES. PATCH TESTS WITH AN ABBREVIATED SCREENING AND PROSTHESIS SERIES WERE ALL NEGATIVE. THE ABSENCE OF MUCIN EXCLUDED A DIAGNOSIS OF RETICULAR ERYTHEMATOUS MUCINOSIS. THERE WAS NO HISTORY OF HEAT APPLICATION TO THE SITE, WHICH ARGUED AGAINST ERYTHEMA AB IGNE AND NARROWED THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS TO RTE. IN SUBSEQUENT FOLLOW-UP APPOINTMENTS, THE AFFECTED SKIN AREA DID NOT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE, AND IT APPEARED THAT THE EFFICACY OF THE SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR WAS DECLINING. THE ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEON WAS PROMPTED TO REPLACE THE IMPLANTED DEVICES; THREE DAYS AFTER THIS, AN ERYTHEMATOUS PATCH AGAIN DEVELOPED OVER THE RIGHT FLANK AREA, SUGGESTING THAT THE DEVICES COULD NOT ACCOUNT FOR THE SKIN ERUPTION. NO FOLLOW-UP INFO WAS AVAILABLE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UNKNOWN SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR | LGW | MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION | IPGNEURO | NA |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66 YR | Required Intervention | LEAD UNKNOWN |