OT ULTRA METER
Report
- Report Number
- 2939301-2011-04794
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- June 13, 2011
- Date of Event
- May 20, 2011
- Report Date
- June 9, 2011
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN INC.
- Product Code
- NBW
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- BR
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
LIFESCAN (LFS) HAS REQUESTED RETURN OF THE SUBJECT PRODUCT(S) FOR EVALUATION. IF THE PRODUCT(S) ARE RETURNED, LFS WILL EVALUATE IT/THEM AND INFORM FDA OF PRODUCT(S) THAT DO NOT PASS INSPECTION IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT. 510K # K062195.
ON (B)(6) 2011, THE LAY-USER/REPORTER CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) (B)(4) ALLEGING THAT THE ONETOUCH ULTRA METER IS GIVING INACCURATE HIGH READING OF "160 MG/DL" COMPARED TO ANOTHER METER READING OF "90 MG/DL." THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE INITIAL DOCUMENTATION AND THE FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION. THE PATIENT TESTS HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE TWICE PER DAY AND MANAGES HIS DIABETES WITH INSULIN. HE TAKES 44 UNITS OF INSULIN: 40 UNITS OF NPH AND 4 UNITS OF REGULAR INSULIN, IN THE MORNING AND THE SAME AMOUNT (40 UNITS OF NPH AND 4 UNITS OF REGULAR INSULIN) AT NIGHT. WHEN HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE IS LOWER THAN 100 MG/DL FIRST HE EATS SOME FOOD AND THEN HE APPLIES INSULIN; HOWEVER, IF HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE IS HIGHER THAN 100 MG/DL, HE ALWAYS TAKES HIS USUAL DOSES OF INSULIN: 44 UNITS. REPORTEDLY, HE TESTED AT "160 MG/DL" ON THE SUBJECT AND TOOK HIS USUAL INSULIN ON (B)(6) 2011 AT 6 AM. APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES LATER, THE PATIENT FELT COLD SWEAT AND LOST CONSCIOUSNESS. HIS WIFE GAVE HIM SUGAR AND TOOK HIM TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM WHERE HE RECEIVED FURTHER TREATMENT WITH IV GLUCOSE AT 7AM. HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE READING WAS TESTED AT "38 MG/DL." HE LEFT THE HOSPITAL AT ABOUT 8:00 AM. AT 10:30 AM, THE PATIENT HAD SYMPTOM OF COLD SWEAT START AGAIN AND HIS WIFE GAVE HIM FOOD (3 BANANAS). HIS SYMPTOMS ABATED SOON AFTER. AT THAT TIME HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 90MG/DL. THE REPORTER FELT HAD THE LFS METER GAVE THE CORRECT READING ON THE DAY OF THE EVENT, THE PATIENT WOULD HAVE ATE BEFORE HE TOOK HER USUAL INSULIN AND PREVENTED THE ALLEGED HYPOGLYCEMIC EPISODE. DURING TROUBLESHOOTING, THE PATIENT NOTED THE REPORTED METER READINGS OF "160 MG/DL" AND "90 MG/DL" WERE TAKEN WITHIN 30 MINUTES OF EACH OTHER. BASED ON STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, THE CALCULATED DIFFERENCE OF THESE GLUCOSE RESULTS EXCEEDS THE EXPECTED VALUE OF <= 30% AND/OR <= 30 MG/DL. THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY RECEIVED TREATMENT FOR HYPOGLYCEMIA AFTER HE TOOK INSULIN PER THE LFS METER READING. REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS WERE SENT TO THE PATIENT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OT ULTRA METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN INC. |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Life Threatening| R |