CYTOMAX II DOUBLE LUMEN CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Report
- Report Number
- 1037905-2025-00042
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- January 13, 2025
- Date of Event
- December 6, 2024
- Report Date
- February 20, 2025
- Manufacturer
- WILSON-COOK MEDICAL INC
- Product Code
- FDX
- UDI-DI
- 10827002226743
- PMA / PMN Number
- K192908
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- JP
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
CONTINUED: SECTION G: 510K: K192908. POSTAL CODE (B)(6). PHONE (B)(6). INVESTIGATION EVALUATION: THE PRODUCT SAID TO BE INVOLVED WAS RETURNED IN A CLEAR PLASTIC BAG. PROVIDED WITH THE RETURN WAS AN OPEN POUCH FROM THE LOT NUMBER PROVIDED IN THE REPORT. THE LABEL MATCHES THE PRODUCT RETURNED. OUR LABORATORY EVALUATION OF THE PRODUCT SAID TO BE INVOLVED CONFIRMED THE REPORT BASED ON THE CONDITION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE. ONLY THE CATHETER AND DRIVE WIRE TO BRUSH ASSEMBLY WAS INCLUDED IN THE RETURN. A VISUAL EXAMINATION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT SHOW ANY KINKS; HOWEVER, THE BRUSH TIP/COIL SPRING HAS DETACHED FROM THE BRUSH WIRE AND WAS NOT INCLUDED. DURING A CLOSE VISUAL EXAMINATION OF THE DEVICE SOLDER WAS OBSERVED AT THE DISTAL END OF THE DRIVE WIRE. AN UNKNOWN REDDISH AND DARK SUBSTANCE WAS OBSERVED ON THE PROXIMAL/HANDLE PORTION OF THE DEVICE AND WITHIN THE BRUSH LUMEN OF THE CATHETER. A PRODUCT-SPECIFIC DISCREPANCY THAT COULD HAVE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THIS OBSERVATION WAS NOT OBSERVED DURING OUR LABORATORY ANALYSIS. THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD FOR THE LOT NUMBER SAID TO BE INVOLVED WAS REVIEWED. A DISCREPANCY OR ANOMALY WAS NOT OBSERVED WITH THE PRODUCT THAT WAS RELEASED FOR DISTRIBUTION. INVESTIGATION CONCLUSION: OUR EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE CONFIRMED THE REPORT. A CORRECTIVE ACTION (CAPA) HAS BEEN INITIATED TO REDUCE OCCURRENCES OF BRUSH TIP/COIL SPRING DETACHMENT FOR CYTOLOGY BRUSH DEVICES. THE PRODUCT SAID TO BE INVOLVED IS INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS. PRIOR TO DISTRIBUTION, ALL CYTOMAX II DOUBLE LUMEN CYTOLOGY BRUSHES ARE SUBJECTED TO A VISUAL INSPECTION AND FUNCTIONAL TESTING TO ENSURE DEVICE INTEGRITY. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD CONFIRMED THAT THE LOT SAID TO BE INVOLVED MET ALL MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO SHIPMENT. CORRECTIVE ACTION: A CORRECTIVE ACTION (CAPA) WAS INITIATED TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE DEVICE FAILURE DUE TO BRUSH TIP/COIL SPRING DETACHMENT. THE PRODUCT SAID TO BE INVOLVED IS INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION. A REVIEW OF THE COMPLAINT HISTORY WAS CONDUCTED. BASED ON THIS REVIEW, THE LIKELIHOOD OF THIS TYPE OF REPORT IS RARE. QUALITY ASSURANCE WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR FOR COMPLAINT TRENDS.
CONTINUED: PHONE (B)(6). INVESTIGATION EVALUATION: THE PRODUCT SAID TO BE INVOLVED WAS RETURNED IN A CLEAR PLASTIC BAG. PROVIDED WITH THE RETURN WAS AN OPEN POUCH FROM THE LOT NUMBER PROVIDED IN THE REPORT. THE LABEL MATCHES THE PRODUCT RETURNED. OUR LABORATORY EVALUATION OF THE PRODUCT SAID TO BE INVOLVED CONFIRMED THE REPORT BASED ON THE CONDITION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE. ONLY THE CATHETER AND DRIVE WIRE TO BRUSH ASSEMBLY WAS INCLUDED IN THE RETURN. A VISUAL EXAMINATION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT SHOW ANY KINKS; HOWEVER, THE BRUSH TIP/COIL SPRING HAS DETACHED FROM THE BRUSH WIRE AND WAS NOT INCLUDED. DURING A CLOSE VISUAL EXAMINATION OF THE DEVICE SOLDER WAS OBSERVED AT THE DISTAL END OF THE DRIVE WIRE. AN UNKNOWN REDDISH AND DARK SUBSTANCE WAS OBSERVED ON THE PROXIMAL/HANDLE PORTION OF THE DEVICE AND WITHIN THE BRUSH LUMEN OF THE CATHETER. A PRODUCT-SPECIFIC DISCREPANCY THAT COULD HAVE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THIS OBSERVATION WAS NOT OBSERVED DURING OUR LABORATORY ANALYSIS. THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD FOR THE LOT NUMBER SAID TO BE INVOLVED WAS REVIEWED. A DISCREPANCY OR ANOMALY WAS NOT OBSERVED WITH THE PRODUCT THAT WAS RELEASED FOR DISTRIBUTION. INVESTIGATION CONCLUSION: OUR EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE CONFIRMED THE REPORT. A CORRECTIVE ACTION (CAPA) HAS BEEN INITIATED TO REDUCE OCCURRENCES OF BRUSH TIP/COIL SPRING DETACHMENT FOR CYTOLOGY BRUSH DEVICES. THE PRODUCT SAID TO BE INVOLVED IS INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS. PRIOR TO DISTRIBUTION, ALL CYTOMAX II DOUBLE LUMEN CYTOLOGY BRUSHES ARE SUBJECTED TO A VISUAL INSPECTION AND FUNCTIONAL TESTING TO ENSURE DEVICE INTEGRITY. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD CONFIRMED THAT THE LOT SAID TO BE INVOLVED MET ALL MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO SHIPMENT. CORRECTIVE ACTION: A CORRECTIVE ACTION (CAPA) WAS INITIATED TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE DEVICE FAILURE DUE TO BRUSH TIP/COIL SPRING DETACHMENT. THE PRODUCT SAID TO BE INVOLVED IS INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION. A REVIEW OF THE COMPLAINT HISTORY WAS CONDUCTED. BASED ON THIS REVIEW, THE LIKELIHOOD OF THIS TYPE OF REPORT IS RARE. QUALITY ASSURANCE WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR FOR COMPLAINT TRENDS.
DURING A BILE DUCT BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK CYTOMAX II DOUBLE LUMEN CYTOLOGY BRUSH. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A KINK WAS NOTICED DURING THE PROCEDURE, BUT IT WAS PERFORMED TO THE END. THERE WAS NO REPORTABLE INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED ON 1(B)(6)2024 AND THE COIL SPRING IS DETACHED AND MISSING. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY; HOWEVER, THE LOCATION OF THE MISSING PORTION IS UNKNOWN. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
DURING A BILE DUCT BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK CYTOMAX II DOUBLE LUMEN CYTOLOGY BRUSH. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A KINK WAS NOTICED DURING THE PROCEDURE, BUT IT WAS PERFORMED TO THE END. THERE WAS NO REPORTABLE INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED ON (B)(6) 2024 AND THE COIL SPRING IS DETACHED AND MISSING. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY; HOWEVER, THE LOCATION OF THE MISSING PORTION IS UNKNOWN. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2025: THE USER FOUND THE TIP WAS DETACHED AND MISSING AFTER SEVERAL BRUSHING. HE DID NOT FIND THE TIP IN THE PATIENT BODY UNDER DIRECT OR FLUOROSCOPIC VISION. HE DETERMINED THE TIP WILL BE EXCRETED NATURALLY AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT FURTHER TREATMENT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 517563 | CYTOMAX II DOUBLE LUMEN CYTOLOGY BRUSH | FDX ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH | FDX | WILSON-COOK MEDICAL INC | G22674 | W4821323 | 10827002226743 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Unknown | ENDOSCOPE-UNKNOWN MAKE OR MODEL. |