DUODERM EXTRA THIN
Report
- Report Number
- 2243969-2011-00015
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 23, 2011
- Date of Event
- April 22, 2011
- Report Date
- April 25, 2011
- Manufacturer
- CONVATEC
- Product Code
- MGQ
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- KS
- Reporter Occupation
- NOT APPLICABLE
Narratives
REPORTED TO THE FDA ON (B)(4) 2011.
THE PT'S MOTHER, A (B)(6) Y/O MALE WAS INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT (UNK TYPE) AND HE SUSTAINED A FACIAL FRACTURE (EXTENT UNK), HE WAS HOSPITALIZED ON (B)(6) 2011. NO ADD'L DETAILS ARE KNOWN REGARDING THE COURSE OF THERAPY IN THE HOSP NOR WHETHER OR NOT THE PT UNDERWENT SURGERY. A DUODERM DRESSING WAS USED ON THE FACE JUST BELOW THE EYE AND AFTER 3 DAYS IN HOSP, THE PT WAS DISCHARGED. ONE DAY THEREAFTER, WHAT WAS INITIALLY DESCRIBED AS AN INFLAMMATION WAS NOTICED IN THE AREA WHERE THE DRESSING HAD BEEN PLACED. ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT KNOWN IF THE INFLAMMATION EXTENDED THE ENTIRE SHAPE OF THE DRESSING, IT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE EXTENDED BEYOND THE MARGINS OF THE DRESSING (BELOW IT). ON RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR CLARIFYING INFO ABOUT THE NATURE OF THE "INFLAMMATION", IT IS NOW REPORTED TO FIRST HAVE APPEARED AS SWELLING, WHICH THEN BECAME A BLISTER. THE BLISTER IS REPORTED TO HAVE BURST AND CAUSED A DARK PIGMENTATION ON THE PT'S FACE. ALSO, THE PT IS SEEING A PHYSICIAN FOR THIS PROBLEM. THE EVENT IS DEEMED SERIOUS AS THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT OF BODILY STRUCTURE OR FUNCTION (FACIAL SCARRING). A CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DRESSING AND THIS EVENT IS DEEMED POSSIBLY RELATED BECAUSE PRODUCT USE IS TEMPORALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE SKIN WHERE THE PROBLEM OCCURRED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DUODERM EXTRA THIN | WOULD DRESSING | MGQ | CONVATEC | NA | UNK |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 YR | Disability |