FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

S-ROM*STM STD,36NK,14X09X130

MDR report key: 2093704 · Received May 12, 2011

Report

Report Number
1818910-2011-08242
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
May 12, 2011
Date of Event
March 24, 2009
Report Date
April 12, 2011
Manufacturer
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US
Product Code
JDI
UDI-DI
10603295170853
PMA / PMN Number
K851422
Removal / Correction Number
NA
Adverse Event
Yes
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
CA, US
Reporter Occupation
OTHER
Health Professional
N

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

DEPUY SYNTHES IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF 21 CFR, PART 803. THIS REPORT MAY BE BASED ON INFORMATION WHICH DEPUY SYNTHES HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO INVESTIGATE OR VERIFY PRIOR TO THE REQUIRED REPORTING DATE. THIS REPORT DOES NOT REFLECT A CONCLUSION BY FDA, DEPUY SYNTHES OR ITS EMPLOYEES THAT THE REPORT CONSTITUTES AN ADMISSION THAT THE DEVICE, DEPUY SYNTHES, OR ITS EMPLOYEES CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE POTENTIAL EVENT DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT. H10 ADDITIONAL NARRATIVE: UDI: (B)(4). ADDED: A2 (DOB), D2B (PROCODE/REGSTAT), D4 (UDI), G3, G5 (PMA/510K), H4, H6 (PATIENT CODE).

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

EPUY SYNTHES IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF 21 CFR, PART 803. THIS REPORT MAY BE BASED ON INFORMATION WHICH DEPUY SYNTHES BEEN ABLE TO INVESTIGATE OR VERIFY PRIOR TO THE REQUIRED REPORTING DATE. THIS REPORT DOES NOT REFLECT A CONCLUSION BY FDA, DEPUY AS NOT SYNTHES OR ITS EMPLOYEES THAT THE REPORT CONSTITUTES AN ADMISSION THAT THE DEVICE, DEPUY SYNTHES, OR ITS EMPLOYEES CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE POTENTIAL EVENT DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT. H10 ADDITIONAL NARRATIVE: CORRECTED: H6 (DEVICE). PRODUCT COMPLAINT # ==> (B)(4). INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ==> NO DEVICE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT WAS RECEIVED FOR EXAMINATION. A WORLDWIDE COMPLAINT DATABASE SEARCH FOUND NO OTHER RELATED REPORTED INCIDENTS AGAINST THE PROVIDED PRODUCT CODE/LOT NUMBER COMBINATION SINCE RELEASE FOR DISTRIBUTION. BASED ON PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS, THIS COMPLICATION OF JOINT REPLACEMENT IS UNLIKELY TO HAVE BEEN THE RESULT OF A DEVICE FAILING TO MEET REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS. THE INFORMATION RECEIVED WILL BE RETAINED FOR POTENTIAL SERIES INVESTIGATIONS IF TRIGGERED BY TREND ANALYSIS, POST MARKET SURVEILLANCE, OR OTHER EVENTS WITHIN THE QUALITY SYSTEM. DEVICE HISTORY LOT ==> NULL. DEVICE HISTORY BATCH ==> NULL. DEVICE HISTORY REVIEW ==> NULL. IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL MEDWATCH, A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

PRODUCT COMPLAINT # ==> (B)(4). DEPUY SYNTHES IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISION OF 21 CFR, PART 803. THE REPORT MAY BE BASED ON THE INFORMATION WHICH DEPUY SYNTHES HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO INVESTIGATE OR VERIFY PRIOR TO THE REQUIRED REPORTING DATE. THIS REPORT DOES NOT REFLECT A CONCLUSION BY FDA, DEPUY SYNTHES OR ITS EMPLOYEES THAT THE REPORT CONSTITUTES AN ADMISSION THAT THE DEVICE, DEPUY SYNTHES, OR ITS EMPLOYEES CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE POTENTIAL EVENT DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT. H10 ADDITIONAL NARRATIVE: IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL MEDWATCH, A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE. INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ==> NO DEVICE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT WAS RECEIVED FOR EXAMINATION. A WORLDWIDE COMPLAINT DATABASE SEARCH FOUND NO OTHER RELATED REPORTED INCIDENTS AGAINST THE PROVIDED PRODUCT CODE/LOT NUMBER COMBINATION SINCE RELEASE FOR DISTRIBUTION. BASED ON PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS, THIS COMPLICATION OF JOINT REPLACEMENT IS UNLIKELY TO HAVE BEEN THE RESULT OF A DEVICE FAILING TO MEET REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS. THE INFORMATION RECEIVED WILL BE RETAINED FOR POTENTIAL SERIES INVESTIGATIONS IF TRIGGERED BY TREND ANALYSIS, POST MARKET SURVEILLANCE, OR OTHER EVENTS WITHIN THE QUALITY SYSTEM. PER INTERNAL PROCEDURES, THE EVENT INFORMATION AND ANY INVESTIGATIONAL INPUTS RECEIVED AS PART OF REQUIRED FOLLOW UP WERE REVIEWED. FOR THIS INVESTIGATION, NO IMMEDIATE ACTION WAS REQUIRED AS NO ALLEGED DEFICIENCY WITH THE DEVICE WAS IDENTIFIED. MONITOR ¿ EXEMPT PER (B)(4) - KNOWN POSSIBLE COMPLICATION OF JOINT REPLACEMENT SURGERY. NO DEVICE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT WAS RECEIVED FOR EXAMINATION. IN ORDER TO DETERMINE IF A LOT RELATED ISSUE WAS POSSIBLE, A WORLDWIDE COMPLAINT DATABASE SEARCH WAS PERFORMED. A WORLDWIDE COMPLAINT DATABASE SEARCH FOUND NO ADDITIONAL RELATED REPORTS AGAINST THE PROVIDED PRODUCT CODE/LOT NUMBER COMBINATION. BASED ON THE INABILITY TO FIND ANY ADDITIONAL RELATED REPORTS AGAINST THE PROVIDED PRODUCT CODE/LOT NUMBER COMBINATION, IT IS REASONABLE TO CONCLUDE THAT THERE ARE NO ANOMALIES WITH REGARD TO MANUFACTURING OR INSPECTION CONTAINED IN THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS THAT WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. THE REPORTED EVENT IS CONSIDERED ONE OF THE POSSIBLE COMPLICATIONS OF JOINT REPLACEMENT. INVESTIGATIONAL INPUTS WERE REQUESTED AS INDICATED PER INTERNAL PROCEDURES FOR THIS FAILURE MODE. THE COMPLAINT INFORMATION PROVIDED HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLAINT CODING, MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTING, AND OTHER DATA REQUIRED BY THE COMPLAINT SYSTEM. FOLLOW-UP FOR ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION, IF APPLICABLE, WAS CONDUCTED UTILIZING WORK INSTRUCTION (B)(4). - WITHOUT THE PHYSICAL COMPLAINT SAMPLE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF THE DEVICE FAILED TO MEET SPECIFICATIONS AT THE TIME IT WAS RELEASED FOR DISTRIBUTION. - THE DEVICE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT WAS USED IN THE TREATMENT OF THE PATIENT AS PRESCRIBED BY THE PRESIDING SURGEON. - FROM THE EVENT INFORMATION RECEIVED, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE DEVICE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. NO EVIDENCE WAS FOUND INDICATING PRODUCT ERROR WAS A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR. THE NEED FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION WAS NOT INDICATED. DEPUY CONSIDERS THE INVESTIGATION CLOSED. SHOULD ADDITIONAL INFO BE RECEIVED, THE INVESTIGATION WILL BE RE-OPENED AS NECESSARY. DEVICE HISTORY LOT ==> NULL. DEVICE HISTORY BATCH ==> NULL. DEVICE HISTORY REVIEW ==> NULL.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

THERE IS NO NEW INFORMATION TO REPORT AT THIS TIME. PER FDA REQUEST, THIS FOLLOW-UP IS BEING SUBMITTED TO FILL THE GAP IN FOLLOW-UP.

Description of Event or Problem · 0

PPF ALLEGES DISLOCATION AND LOOSENING OF STEM. ADDED DOB, LAWYER, REVISION SURGEON IN ASSOCIATED CONTACT, ACCOUNT NAME, PATIENT HARM AND MANUFACTURED DATE IN IPS. DOI: (B)(6) 2004 - DOR: (B)(6) 2009 (RIGHT HIP).

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

THIS COMPLAINT IS STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION. DEPUY WILL NOTIFY THE FDA OF THE RESULTS OF THIS INVESTIGATION ONCE IT HAS BEEN COMPLETED.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

THE DEVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT WERE NOT RETURNED AND ARE PRESUMED YET IMPLANTED. REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS AND/OR A COMPLAINT DATABASE SEARCH WAS NOT POSSIBLE AS THE PRODUCT AND LOT CODES REQUIRED WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE INVESTIGATION COULD NOT DRAW ANY CONCLUSIONS REGARDING THE REPORTED EVENT WITH THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. BASED ON THE INABILITY TO IDENTIFY A ROOT CAUSE, THE NEED FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION WAS NOT INDICATED. DEPUY CONSIDERS THE INVESTIGATION CLOSED AT THIS TIME. SHOULD THE PRODUCT OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE RECEIVED TO CHANGE THE OUTCOME OF THE PERFORMED INVESTIGATION, THE COMPLAINT WILL BE RE-OPENED.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

LITIGATION PAPERS ALLEGE: PATIENT'S HIP BEGAN TO NOTICE INCREASING PAIN AND DISCOMFORT IN HER HIP. BY 2008, THE PAIN AND DISCOMFORT MADE IT DIFFICULT FOR PATIENT TO WALK. HER [PHYSICIAN] DECIDED THAT PATIENT NEEDED TO HAVE HER HIP IMPLANT SURGICALLY REMOVED AND REPLACED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. OVER THE NEXT TWO MONTHS, PATIENT'S HIP DISLOCATED TWICE. ON (B)(6) 2009 PATIENT UNDERWENT YET ANOTHER SURGICAL PROCEDURE TO REDUCE HER HIP BACK INTO THE JOINT.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
319949 S-ROM*STM STD,36NK,14X09X130 S-ROM HIP SYSTEM : HIP FEMORAL STEM JDI DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US NA 1082483 10603295170853

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 25 YR Female Required Intervention