RESOLUTION HEMOSTASIS CLIPPING DEVICE
Report
- Report Number
- 3005099803-2011-01729
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 17, 2011
- Date of Event
- April 28, 2011
- Report Date
- April 28, 2011
- Manufacturer
- BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MARLBOROUGH
- Product Code
- MND
- PMA / PMN Number
- K040148
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- VA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
THE COMPLAINANT WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE THE SUSPECT DEVICE LOT NUMBER; THEREFORE, THE LOT EXPIRATION AND DEVICE MANUFACTURE DATES ARE UNKNOWN.THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED FOR ANALYSIS. UPON RECEIPT AND COMPLETION OF THE FAILURE ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE, IF THERE IS ANY FURTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION FROM THAT REVIEW, A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED.
A VISUAL EXAMINATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THAT THE CLIP ASSEMBLY WAS FULLY DEPLOYED AND WAS NOT RETURNED. IN ADDITION, THERE WAS A KINK IN THE CONTROL WIRE. THE REPORTED EVENT OF CLIP FAILED TO RELEASE WAS NOT ABLE TO BE CONFIRMED DUE TO THE CLIP ASSEMBLY NOT BEING RETURNED. HOWEVER, THE FAILURE LIKELY OCCURRED DUE TO ANATOMICAL/PROCEDURAL FACTORS WHICH LIMITED THE DEVICE PERFORMANCE, AS EVIDENT BY THE KINK IN THE CONTROL WIRE. THEREFORE, THE MOST PROBABLE ROOT CAUSE IS OPERATIONAL CONTEXT. A LABELING REVIEW WAS PERFORMED AND NO ANOMALY WAS FOUND.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO ONE OF TWO DEVICES USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. MANUFACTURER REPORT # 3005099803-2011-02326 ADDRESSES THE OTHER DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT TWO RESOLUTION CLIP DEVICES WERE USED DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY (EGD) PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2011. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, UPON ARRIVAL TO THE PROCEDURE ROOM, THE PATIENT HAD AN ULCER IN THE DUODENUM WHICH WAS ACTIVELY BLEEDING. THE SITE WAS CAUTERIZED AND INJECTED WITH EPINEPHRINE, THEN A CLIP WAS PLACED. THE BLEED HAD STOPPED, HOWEVER, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN WENT TO REMOVE THE DEVICE, THE CLIP FAILED TO RELEASE FROM THE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE CLIP FROM THE TISSUE, BUT THIS LED TO FURTHER BLEEDING. THE CLIP WAS REMOVED ATTACHED TO THE DELIVERY SYSTEM, THEN ANOTHER ATTEMPT WAS MADE USING A NEW CLIP, BUT THE SAME ISSUE RECURRED. HOWEVER, NO TISSUE DAMAGE OR ADDITIONAL BLEEDING RESULTED FROM THE SECOND CLIP FAILING TO RELEASE. THE CLIP WAS REMOVED ATTACHED TO THE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD RESOLUTION CLIP DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE FINE.
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A RESOLUTION CLIP DEVICE WAS USED DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY (EGD) PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2011. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, UPON ARRIVAL TO THE PROCEDURE ROOM, THE PATIENT HAD AN ULCER IN THE DUODENUM WHICH WAS ACTIVELY BLEEDING. THE SITE WAS CAUTERIZED AND INJECTED WITH EPINEPHRINE, THEN A CLIP WAS PLACED. THE BLEED HAD STOPPED, HOWEVER, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN WENT TO REMOVE THE DEVICE, THE CLIP FAILED TO RELEASE FROM THE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE CLIP FROM THE TISSUE, BUT THIS LED TO FURTHER BLEEDING. THE CLIP WAS REMOVED ATTACHED TO THE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER RESOLUTION CLIP DEVICE. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE FINE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RESOLUTION HEMOSTASIS CLIPPING DEVICE | LIGATOR, ESOPHAGEAL | MND | BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MARLBOROUGH | M00522610 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64 YR | Required Intervention |