XIENCE V EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2011-03311
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 9, 2011
- Date of Event
- April 14, 2011
- Report Date
- April 14, 2011
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- NIQ
- PMA / PMN Number
- P070015
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- JA
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). INDICATION FOR USE AND PATIENT SELECTION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. ANGINA, CARDIAC ARREST, DEATH, EKG CHANGES, AND THROMBOSIS ARE KNOWN ADVERSE EVENTS AS LISTED IN THE XIENCE V INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). ALTHOUGH A CONCLUSIVE CAUSE FOR THE REPORTED PATIENT EFFECTS AND THE RELATIONSHIP TO THE DEVICE, IF ANY, CANNOT BE DETERMINED, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCY WITH RESPECT TO MANUFACTURE, DESIGN, OR LABELING. SINCE IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A RECENT ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (AMI) PATIENT, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE XIENCE V IFU STATES: THE XIENCE V STENT IS CONTRAINDICATED FOR USE IN PATIENTS WHO HAD RECENT ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (AMI). IN ADDITION, SINCE IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LESION WAS 40MM LONG, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE IFU STATES: THIS DEVICE IS INDICATED FOR IMPROVING CORONARY LUMINAL DIAMETER IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC HEART DISEASE DUE TO DE NOVO NATIVE CORONARY ARTERY LESIONS (LENGTH LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 28 MM) WITH REFERENCE VESSEL DIAMETERS OF 2.5 MM TO 3.75 MM. THE IFU CAUTIONS THAT: THE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STENT HAVE NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR SUBJECT POPULATIONS WITH LESION LENGTHS GREATER THAN 28 MM. IN THIS CASE, THE REPORTED IFU DEVIATIONS DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE DIRECTLY CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED PATIENT EFFECTS THAT OCCURRED. .
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE PROMUS IS BEING FILED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDWATCH MFR NUMBER. ESTIMATED IMPLANT DATE OF (B)(6) 2011 WHICH WAS REPORTED AS (B)(6) 2011. THE STENT REMAINS IN THE PATIENT. A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL ADDITIONAL RELEVANT INFORMATION.
(B)(4).
SUBSEQUENT TO THE INITIAL INFORMATION RECEIVED, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED: DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE ON (B)(6), 2011, AFTER THE XIENCE V 2.5 X 23 MM STENT AND THE PROMUS 2.7 5X 23 MM STENT WERE IMPLANTED, INTRA-VASCULAR ULTRA SOUND (IVUS) WAS PERFORMED AND STENT APPOSITION WAS NOTED TO BE GOOD. ON (B)(6), 2011, DURING ANOTHER PROCEDURE TO TREAT A DIFFERENT LESION, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED CHEST PAIN AND EKG CHANGES. SUB-ACUTE THROMBOSIS WAS NOTED AND BALLOONING AND ASPIRATION OF THE THROMBUS WAS PERFORMED. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT DIED DUE TO CARDIAC ARREST.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT IN (B)(6) 2011, A PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A PROXIMAL TO MID LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING LESION WITH HEAVY CALCIFICATION. ROTABLATOR WAS PERFORMED, AND A XIENCE V STENT AND A PROMUS STENT WERE IMPLANTED IN A MANNER THAT ONE STENT WAS OVERLAPPING THE OTHER. INTRA-VASCULAR ULTRA SOUND WAS PERFORMED. ON (B)(6) 2011, ANOTHER PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A DIFFERENT LESION. IN THIS PROCEDURE, THROMBOSIS WAS OBSERVED IN THE XIENCE V STENT AND PROMUS STENT AT THE OVERLAPPED POINT. THE THROMBOSIS WAS TREATED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELAE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
SUBSEQUENT TO THE INITIAL INFORMATION RECEIVED, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. WHEN THE XIENCE AND PROMUS WERE DEPLOYED ON (B)(6) 2011, POST-DILATATION WAS PERFORMED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO MALPOSITION WAS OBSERVED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | XIENCE V EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM | DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM | NIQ | AV-TEMECULA-CT |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 YR | Death| H| R | RX PROMUS |