SPEEDBAND SUPERVIEW SUPER 7
Report
- Report Number
- 3005099803-2024-06060
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- November 27, 2024
- Date of Event
- November 5, 2024
- Report Date
- September 26, 2025
- Manufacturer
- BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
- Product Code
- MND
- PMA / PMN Number
- 510K EXEMPT
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- IN
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
BLOCK H6: IMDRF DEVICE CODE A050502 CAPTURES THE REPORTABLE EVENT OF BANDS MISFIRED. IMDRF DEVICE CODE A050501 CAPTURES THE REPORTABLE EVENT OF BANDS UNABLE TO DEPLOY.
H6: IMDRF DEVICE CODE A050502 CAPTURES THE REPORTABLE EVENT OF BANDS MISFIRED. IMDRF DEVICE CODE A150103 CAPTURES THE REPORTABLE EVENT OF BANDS PREMATURELY DEPLOYED. H2 (ADDITIONAL INFORMATION): B5 AND H6 (DEVICE CODES) HAVE BEEN UPDATED BASED ON THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON NOVEMBER 30, 2024.
BLOCK H6: IMDRF DEVICE CODE A050502 CAPTURES THE REPORTABLE EVENT OF BANDS MISFIRED. IMDRF DEVICE CODE A150103 CAPTURES THE REPORTABLE EVENT OF BANDS PREMATURELY DEPLOYED. BLOCK H11: THE RETURNED SPEEDBAND SUPERVIEW SUPER 7 WAS ANALYZED, AND A VISUAL EVALUATION NOTED THAT THE TEETH WERE DAMAGED, AND TWO BANDS WERE OVERLAPPED. ADDITIONALLY, THE SLACK WAS TAKEN UP AND IT WAS SECURED TO THE POST. NO OTHER PROBLEMS WITH THE DEVICE WERE NOTED. THE REPORTED EVENT OF BANDS UNABLE TO DEPLOY WAS CONFIRMED. UPON ANALYSIS, THE TEETH OF THE DEVICE WERE DAMAGED. THE MARKINGS ON THE LIGATOR HOUSING SUGGEST THAT EXCESSIVE FORCE MAY HAVE BEEN APPLIED DURING USE, POTENTIALLY CAUSING THE DAMAGE. ALTERNATIVELY, THE PROBLEM COULD BE RELATED TO THE TECHNIQUE USED BY THE PHYSICIAN WHEN INSERTING THE DEVICE INTO THE PATIENT, WHICH MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE DAMAGE AND AFFECTED THE HANDLE FUNCTIONALITY DURING BAND DEPLOYMENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE REPORTED PROBLEM OF THE BANDS FAILING TO DEPLOY MIGHT HAVE TO DO WITH THE TECHNIQUE USED BY THE PHYSICIAN OR THE WAY THE DEVICE WAS HANDLED. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE WAY IN WHICH THE DEVICE WAS PLACED, OR THE TORTUOSITY DURING THE PROCEDURE, AFFECTED THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE HANDLE, CAUSING THE BANDS TO FEEL DIFFICULT TO DEPLOY. THE MARKS ON THE LIGATOR HOUSING TEETH IMPLY THAT THE DEVICE MIGHT HAVE BEEN USED WITH TOO MUCH FORCE, OR PERHAPS THIS COULD BE ATTRIBUTED TO THE WAY THE PHYSICIAN WAS ENTERING THE DEVICE THROUGH THE PATIENT, AFFECTING THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE HANDLE WHEN DEPLOYING THE BANDS. THEREFORE, THE MOST PROBABLE ROOT CAUSE OF THIS COMPLAINT IS ADVERSE EVENT RELATED TO PROCEDURE.
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A SPEEDBAND SUPERVIEW SUPER 7 WAS USED DURING A BANDING PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BANDS ENCOUNTERED "IRREGULAR" DEPLOYMENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. IT WAS NOTED THAT NO DIFFICULTY WAS EXPERIENCED UPON SETTING UP THE DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED DESPITE GOOD-FAITH EFFORTS. THE REPORTED EVENT MAY SUGGEST THAT THE BANDS DID NOT DEPLOY OFF THE LIGATOR AND THE BANDS MISFIRED IN AN UNINTENTIONAL LOCATION.
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A SPEEDBAND SUPERVIEW SUPER 7 WAS USED DURING A BANDING PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BANDS ENCOUNTERED "IRREGULAR" DEPLOYMENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. IT WAS NOTED THAT NO DIFFICULTY WAS EXPERIENCED UPON SETTING UP THE DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON NOVEMBER 30, 2024: THE SPEEDBAND SUPERVIEW SUPER 7 WAS USED IN THE ESOPHAGUS DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC VARICEAL LIGATION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BANDS PREMATURELY DEPLOYED AND ALSO THE BANDS MISFIRED.
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A SPEEDBAND SUPERVIEW SUPER 7 WAS USED DURING A BANDING PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BANDS ENCOUNTERED "IRREGULAR" DEPLOYMENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. IT WAS NOTED THAT NO DIFFICULTY WAS EXPERIENCED UPON SETTING UP THE DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON NOVEMBER 30, 2024: THE SPEEDBAND SUPERVIEW SUPER 7 WAS USED IN THE ESOPHAGUS DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC VARICEAL LIGATION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BANDS PREMATURELY DEPLOYED AND ALSO THE BANDS MISFIRED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2370073 | SPEEDBAND SUPERVIEW SUPER 7 | LIGATOR, ESOPHAGEAL | MND | BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION | M00542250 | 0034149690 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Unknown |