ACRYSOF IQ NATURAL SINGLEPIECE IOL
Report
- Report Number
- 1119421-2024-02304
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- November 25, 2024
- Date of Event
- October 28, 2024
- Report Date
- February 11, 2025
- Manufacturer
- ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON
- Product Code
- HQL
- PMA / PMN Number
- P930014
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- KS
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
A SAMPLE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. COMPLAINT HISTORY AND PRODUCT HISTORY RECORD COULD NOT BE REVIEWED BECAUSE THE REPORTING FACILITY DID NOT PROVIDE A VALID LOT NUMBER OR ANY IDENTIFICATION TRACEABLE TO THE MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTATION. ROOT CAUSE HAS NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED. THE MANUFACTURER INTERNAL REFERENCE NUMBER IS: (B)(4).
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS ADDED IN B.5., H.3., H.6. AND H.11. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT RETURNED. THE PROVIDE PHOTOS WERE REVIEWED BY GLOBAL QUALITY CUSTOMER AFFAIRS (GQCA). ADDRESSING THE REPORT OF ¿IT IS ESTIMATED THAT INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) OPACIFICATION OCCURRED 10 YEARS AFTER SURGERY WITH COMPANY LENS IN 2014. OPACIFICATION IS CLEAR WHEN VIEWED WITH A SLIT LAMP, AND THERE IS A DIFFERENCE FROM THE OTHER EYE IN THE PATIENT'S FUNDUS PHOTO,¿ THE PROVIDED IMAGE IS MODERATELY BLURRY, SHOWING A COMPUTER MONITOR WITH RIGHT AND LEFT EYE POSTERIOR POLE FUNDUS PHOTOGRAPHS ON THE LEFT SIDE, AND A SLIT LAMP IMAGE ON THE RIGHT. A GENERAL OBSERVATION OF THE FUNDUS PHOTOS DEMONSTRATES THAT THE RIGHT EYE APPEARS DARKER OVERALL THAN THE LEFT. HOWEVER, DUE TO THE BLURRY IMAGE, FURTHER DETAILS CANNOT BE ACCURATELY ASSESSED AND COMPARED. REGARDING THE LENS FINDINGS IN THE SLIT LAMP IMAGE, ONLY THE CENTRAL AREA OF THE LENS IS VISIBLE THROUGH THE MIOTIC PUPIL. WHILE THE VISIBLE AREA APPEARS CLOUDY, FURTHER DETAILS CANNOT BE ASSESSED DUE TO THE LIMITATIONS OF THE IMAGE QUALITY AND THE MIOTIC PUPIL. GIVEN THESE CONSTRAINTS, THE IDENTITY OF THE CLOUDY APPEARING LENS CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM THIS PHOTO REVIEW ALONE, FURTHER EVALUATION IS NECESSARY TO ACCURATELY IDENTIFY REPORTED OPACIFICATION AND DETERMINE ITS RELEVANCE TO THE COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION. THE COMPLAINT HISTORY AND PRODUCT HISTORY RECORDS COULD NOT BE REVIEWED BECAUSE THE REPORTING FACILITY DID NOT PROVIDE A LOT NUMBER OR ANY IDENTIFICATION TRACEABLE TO THE MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTATION. ASSOCIATED PRODUCT INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE ROOT CAUSE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED FOR THE REPORTED COMPLAINT. PHOTOS WERE PROVIDED. BASED ON THE REVIEW OF THE PROVIDED PHOTOS, THERE APPEARED TO BE A POTENTIALLY CLOUDY AREA OF THE LENS IN THE EYE. THE PHOTOS WERE TAKEN 10 YEARS AFTER SURGERY WITH COMPANY LENS IN 2014. DUE TO THE BLURRY IMAGE, FURTHER DETAILS CANNOT BE ACCURATELY ASSESSED AND COMPARED. IT IS DIFFICULT TO MAKE A FINAL DETERMINATION WITHOUT EVALUATION OF THE PHYSICAL SAMPLE. THE ROOT CAUSE CANNOT BE DETERMINED BASED ON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. DUE DILIGENCE HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN AN ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS EVENT. THE REPORTER HAS NOT RESPONDED TO REQUEST FOR FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION. FILE WILL BE REOPENED IF NEW INFORMATION OR THE SAMPLE IS RECEIVED. THE MANUFACTURER INTERNAL REFERENCE NUMBER IS: (B)(4).
A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, IT WAS ESTIMATED THAT IOL OPACIFICATION OCCURRED 10 YEARS AFTER SURGERY. OPACIFICATION WAS CLEAR WHEN VIEWED WITH A SLIT LAMP, AND THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE FROM THE OTHER EYE IN THE PATIENT FUNDUS PHOTO. CURRENTLY, THE PATIENT UNCORRECTED VISION WAS 0.1 AND THE CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY WAS 0.1, AND THE PATIENT COMPLAINS OF INCONVENIENCE IN DAILY LIFE. IT SEEMS THAT IOL FIXATION SHOULD BE PERFORMED INSTEAD OF SIMPLE IOL REMOVAL BY REMOVING THE IOL THAT HAS BEEN 10 YEARS OLD, AND SINCE THE HOSPITAL WAS NOT CURRENTLY PERFORMING IOL FIXATION, IT WAS SCHEDULED TO BE TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER HOSPITAL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED ADDRESSING THE REPORT OF "IT WAS ESTIMATED THAT IOL OPACIFICATION OCCURRED 10 YEARS AFTER SURGERY WITH COMPANY LENS. OPACIFICATION WAS CLEAR WHEN VIEWED WITH A SLIT LAMP, AND THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE FROM THE OTHER EYE IN THE PATIENT FUNDUS PHOTO," THE PROVIDED IMAGE WAS MODERATELY BLURRY, SHOWING A COMPUTER MONITOR WITH RIGHT AND LEFT EYE POSTERIOR POLE FUNDUS PHOTOGRAPHS ON THE LEFT SIDE, AND A SLIT LAMP IMAGE ON THE RIGHT. A GENERAL OBSERVATION OF THE FUNDUS PHOTOS DEMONSTRATES THAT THE RIGHT EYE APPEARS DARKER OVERALL THAN THE LEFT. HOWEVER, DUE TO THE BLURRY IMAGE, FURTHER DETAILS CANNOT BE ACCURATELY ASSESSED AND COMPARED. REGARDING THE LENS FINDINGS IN THE SLIT LAMP IMAGE, ONLY THE CENTRAL AREA OF THE LENS WAS VISIBLE THROUGH THE MIOTIC PUPIL. WHILE THE VISIBLE AREA APPEARS CLOUDY, FURTHER DETAILS CANNOT BE ASSESSED DUE TO THE LIMITATIONS OF THE IMAGE QUALITY AND THE MIOTIC PUPIL. GIVEN THESE CONSTRAINTS, THE IDENTITY OF THE CLOUDY APPEARING LENS CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM THIS PHOTO REVIEW ALONE, FURTHER EVALUATION WAS NECESSARY TO ACCURATELY IDENTIFY REPORTED OPACIFICATION AND DETERMINE ITS RELEVANCE TO THE COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION.
IOL OPACIFICATION OCCURRED DUE TO GLISTENING.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2255715 | ACRYSOF IQ NATURAL SINGLEPIECE IOL | INTRAOCULAR LENS | HQL | ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON | SN60WF | ASKU |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 89 YR | Male | Other |