CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO ANNULOPLASTY RING
Report
- Report Number
- 2015691-2011-15392
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 1, 2011
- Date of Event
- February 23, 2011
- Report Date
- March 31, 2011
- Manufacturer
- EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
- Product Code
- KRH
- PMA / PMN Number
- K926138
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- MI, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
EVALUATION: AS RECEIVED THE RING EXHIBITS MODERATE HOST TISSUE OVERGROWTH. SUTURE THREADS ARE EVIDENT IN THE SEWING RING. MINOR CUTS IN THE SEWING FABRIC IS EVIDENT MOST LIKELY DUE TO MECHANICAL DAMAGE AT EXPLANT. NO OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DETECTED OR IN THE X-RAY, AS THE BAND IS INTACT. THE RETURNED DEVICE WAS EXAMINED VISUALLY AND WITH A LIGHT MICROSCOPE AND DIGITAL MICROSCOPE. X-RAY AND LIGHT/DIGITAL MICROSCOPE. ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE: THE DEVICE EVALUATION WAS COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2011.
EVALUATION METHOD: DEVICE EVALUATION ANTICIPATED, BUT NOT YET BEGUN. CONCLUSION: DEVICE EVALUATION ANTICIPATED, BUT NOT YET BEGUN. ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE: THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD (DHR) REVIEW WAS COMPLETED AND CONFIRMS THAT THIS DEVICE PASSED ALL MANUFACTURING AND STERILIZATION INSPECTIONS. OPERATIVE REPORT INDICATES THE EXPLANTED NATIVE VALVE WAS FOUND TO HAVE DEHISCENCE. THE SURGEON INDICATED THAT THE REASON FOR EXPLANT IS NOT RELATED TO EDWARDS' RING MALFUNCTION. DEVICE EVALUATION RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS WILL REPORTED ONCE COMPLETED.
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES MAINTAINS AN IMPLANT PATIENT REGISTRY. THIS REGISTRY IS A PATIENT TRACKING MECHANISM FOR SERIALIZED EDWARDS IMPLANTABLE DEVICES (BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVES AND ANNULOPLASTY RINGS), RATHER THAN A TRUE POST-MARKET SURVEILLANCE REGISTRY. THROUGH THE REGISTRY, EDWARDS IS NOTIFIED WHEN THESE DEVICES ARE IMPLANTED. IN ADDITION, PATIENT AND/OR DEVICE STATUS MAY BE REPORTED TO THE REGISTRY VIA THE IMPLANTATION DATA CARDS. THE INFORMATION IS RECEIVED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES (E.G. SURGEON, HOSPITAL, AND PATIENT FAMILY MEMBERS) AND IS NOT RECEIVED IN THE FORM OF A CONVENTIONAL "CUSTOMER COMPLAINT". THE INFORMATION REPORTED MAY OR MAY NOT BE RELATED TO THE EDWARDS DEVICE. IN THIS CASE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE EDWARDS PHYSIO RING WAS EXPLANTED AFTER AN IMPLANT DURATION OF APPROXIMATELY 2 MONTHS. UPON FOLLOW-UP WITH THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, IT WAS LEARNED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED REGURGITATION. OPERATIVE REPORT INDICATES THE EXCISED [NATIVE] VALVE WAS FOUND TO HAVE DEHISCENCE, AND WAS REPLACED WITH AN EDWARDS' VALVE. THE SURGEON INDICATED THAT THE REASON FOR EXPLANTING THE RING IS PATIENT RELATED AND NOT DUE TO A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO ANNULOPLASTY RING | ANNULOPLASTY RING | KRH | EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES | 4450 | R-09E1230 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 69 YR | Required Intervention |