FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM

MDR report key: 2073110 · Received April 29, 2011

Report

Report Number
2024168-2011-03014
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
April 29, 2011
Date of Event
April 6, 2011
Report Date
April 6, 2011
Manufacturer
AV-TEMECULA-CT
Product Code
MGB
PMA / PMN Number
P960043
Adverse Event
Yes
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
NC, US
Reporter Occupation
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

(B)(4). EVALUATION SUMMARY: EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE INDICATED THAT THE POSTERIOR CUFF MISS OCCURRED AS THE POSTERIOR CUFF WAS REMAINING IN THE FOOT POCKET. THE POSTERIOR NEEDLE TIP WAS RELEASED FROM THE SHANK BUT REMAINED UNDISTURBED, SUGGESTING THAT IT WAS DEFLECTED AWAY FROM THE POSTERIOR FOOT INSTEAD OF ENGAGED WITH THE POSTERIOR CUFF INSIDE THE POSTERIOR FOOT POCKET DURING NEEDLE DEPLOYMENT AS DESIGNED. BECAUSE THE POSTERIOR NEEDLE DID NOT ENGAGE WITH THE POSTERIOR CUFF, THE CUFF WAS NOT EJECTED FROM THE FOOT. WHEN THE PLUNGER WAS REMOVED FROM THE DEVICE, THE LINK WAS HELD ON ONE END BY THE POSTERIOR CUFF IN THE FOOT POCKET WHILE BEING PULLED ON THE OTHER END BY THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE PLUNGER. THIS RESULTED IN THE ANTERIOR CUFF DETACHING FROM THE NEEDLE AS INDICATED BY DAMAGED ANTERIOR CUFF TABS AND ANTERIOR NEEDLE BARB. POSTERIOR CUFF MISS AND SUBSEQUENT ANTERIOR CUFF DETACHMENT WOULD DIRECTLY RESULT IN A FAILURE TO RETRIEVE THE SUTURE DURING THE NEEDLE PLUNGER RETRACTION AS REPORTED. DURING TESTING, THE PLUNGER WAS REINSERTED TO TEST THE NEEDLE TRAJECTORY AND PUSH MANDREL TRAVEL LENGTH AND THE RESULTS MET THE MANUFACTURING CRITERIA. THE NEEDLE TRAJECTORY OF EVERY DEVICE IS CHECKED TWICE DURING MANUFACTURING. BASED ON THE SUCCESSFUL TEST OF THE DEVICES, THE PROBABLE ROOT CAUSE FOR THE POSTERIOR CUFF MISS AND SUBSEQUENT ANTERIOR CUFF-TO-NEEDLE TIP DETACHMENT IS NEEDLE DEFLECTION DUE TO INTERACTION WITH HUMAN TISSUE OR A FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A STABLE POSITION OF THE DEVICE WITH RESPECT TO THE TISSUE TRACT, AS SPECIFIED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO MANUFACTURING OR QUALITY ISSUE WAS DETECTED.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE DEVICE WAS RECEIVED. INVESTIGATION IS NOT YET COMPLETE. A FOLLOW-UP WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PERCLOSE PROGLIDE DEVICE ATTEMPTED ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF THE COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY AFTER AN INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, AFTER NEEDLE DEPLOYMENT, THE SUTURES WERE NOT RETRIEVED. A SECOND PROGLIDE DEVICE WAS USED TO ACHIEVE HEMOSTASIS. THERE WAS NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA. THOUGH REQUESTED, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
1 PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE MGB AV-TEMECULA-CT 010136H

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 81 YR Required Intervention