PHYSIOMESH
Report
- Report Number
- 2210968-2011-00517
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- April 27, 2011
- Report Date
- April 4, 2011
- Manufacturer
- ETHICON
- Product Code
- FTL
- PMA / PMN Number
- K093932
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- SW
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
(B)(4).RESULTS: THE EXPLANTED MESH SHOWED THE NON-RESORBABLE, LARGE PORE, MONOFILAMENT POLYPROPYLENE MESH WHICH SHOWS MINIMAL FOREIGN BODY REACTION. THE IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DETECTION OF THE PERITONEUM ON BOTH THE VISCERAL AND PARIETAL SIDE OF MESH INDICATES THAT THE MESH HAS NOT BEEN PLACED FLAT AGAINST THE ABDOMINAL WALL. A RELATION TO THE USED FIXATION (ABSORBATACKS) CANNOT BE DRAWN. CONCLUSION- THE RECURRENCE SEEMS TO BE DUE TO INADEQUATE FIXATION AS IN THE HISTOLOGICAL EXAMINATION PERITONEUM CELLS WERE FOUND ON BOTH SIDES OF THE MESH.
(B)(4). RECURRENT HERNIA. CONCLUSION: THE PRODUCT UPON WHICH THIS MEDWATCH IS BASED IS ANTICIPATED. ONCE THE PRODUCT IS RECEIVED, ANY FURTHER INFORMATION DERIVED FROM THE EVALUATION WILL BE SUBMITTED IN A SUPPLEMENTAL 3500A FORM.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2010 TO REPAIR A VENTRAL HERNIA AND MESH WAS IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A RECURRENT HERNIA ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN OPEN HERNIA REPAIR PROCEDURE (B)(6) 2011. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE MESH WAS VERY EASILY REMOVED BECAUSE IT WAS HARDLY ATTACHED TO THE PERITONEUM WITH ALMOST NO INGROWTH. A DIFFERENT MESH WAS USED COMPLETE THE REPAIR PROCEDURE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PHYSIOMESH | MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC | FTL | ETHICON | NA | NI |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention | ABSORBATACK |