BD PHOENIX PANEL NMIC/ID-123
Report
- Report Number
- 1119779-2011-00001
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- March 1, 2011
- Date of Event
- January 4, 2011
- Report Date
- January 18, 2011
- Manufacturer
- BD DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS
- Product Code
- LON
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- WI, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
QUALITY TESTED A TOTAL OF EIGHT PANELS FROM CUSTOMER RETURNS. TWO OUT OF THE EIGHT PANELS FAILED THE ESBL TEST WITH K. PNEUMONIAE ATCC 700603 WITH A NEGATIVE RESULT. ADD'L RETENTION PANELS WERE TESTED AND PASSED THE ESBL TEST WITH THE EXPECTED POSITIVE RESULT. THE BATCH HISTORY RECORDS WERE EXAMINED AND NO ABNORMALITIES WERE NOTED. A CAPA WAS INITIATED TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THIS ISSUE. ADD'L TESTING, OF THE PANELS IN QUESTION, REVEALED A DRUG SWITCH IN WELLS WHICH CONTAINS CEFTAZIDIME/CLAVULANIC ACID AND WHICH CONTAINS CEFOTAXIME/CLAVULANIC ACID. THE CORRECT PANEL LAYOUT SHOULD BE THE REVERSE. THE ROOT CAUSE DETERMINED THAT THE DRUGS WERE SWITCHED DURING THE STOCK SOLUTION PREPARATION. THESE WELLS ARE 2 OF 6 TOTAL WELLS WHICH COMBINE TO CREATE THE ESBL TEST RESULT. THIS WOULD IMPACT E. COLI, K. OXYTOCA AND K. PNEUMONIAE ORGANISMS IDENTIFIED WITH THIS PANEL. THE REMAINING BIOCHEMICAL AND ANTIMICROBIAL WELLS ON THE PANEL USED FOR IDENTIFICATION AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING ARE UNAFFECTED AND CONTINUE TO PERFORM AS EXPECTED. TESTING USING CHARACTERIZED IN HOUSE STRAINS, CONFIRMED THAT THIS DRUG REVERSAL COULD RESULT IN SPORADIC FALSE NEGATIVE OR FALSE POSITIVE ESBL TEST RESULTS. BD WILL BE RECALLING THE PRODUCT AND HAS INITIATED CORRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE OF THIS ISSUE. THIS RECALL WILL BE REPORTED THROUGH THE BALTIMORE DISTRICT OFFICE.
A CUSTOMER CALLED TO REPORT SPORADIC ESBL (EXTENDED SPECTRUM BETA LACTAMASE) FAILURES WITH QUALITY CONTROL (QC) ORGANISM KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE ATCC 700603. WHILE RUNNING QUALITY CONTROL ON THEIR NEW LOT OF PANELS, THEY HAD 2 OUT OF 5 FAILURES FOR THIS ORGANISM. THE FIRST FAILURE WAS WITH A BRAND NEW SUBCULTURE THAT HAD BEEN PASSED TWICE AND THE SECOND WITH AN OLDER CULTURE. CUSTOMER REPEATED THE QUALITY CONTROL USING A FRESH ORGANISM THINKING THAT THE ORGANISM WAS THE ISSUE. REPEAT TESTING WITH THE NEW ORGANISM PASSED AND THE CUSTOMER BEGAN A NEW 5 DAY VALIDATION. AFTER A FEW DAYS THE CUSTOMER CALLED BACK AND REPORTED THAT THEY WERE AGAIN EXPERIENCING ESBL QC FAILURE. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT WHEN RUNNING THE SENSITIVITY ONLY PANELS, THERE WERE NO QC FAILURES. PANELS WERE NOT USED DUE TO QC FAILURE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BD PHOENIX PANEL NMIC/ID-123 | LON | BD DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS | 0223498 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other |