PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2011-02170
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- March 30, 2011
- Date of Event
- March 2, 2011
- Report Date
- March 7, 2011
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- OH, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE SECOND PROGLIDE DEVICE IS BEING FILED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDWATCH MFR NUMBER. A CUFF MISS CAN OCCUR DUE TO A NUMBER OF FACTORS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO NEEDLE DEFLECTION DURING PLUNGER DEPLOYMENT DUE TO INTERACTION WITH HUMAN TISSUE, AGGRESSIVE AND FAST DEPLOYMENT OF THE PLUNGER OR A FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A STABLE POSITION OF THE DEVICE WITH RESPECT TO THE TISSUE TRACT DURING NEEDLE DEPLOYMENT. ULTIMATELY, THE RETURN OF PROGLIDE DEVICE MAY HAVE AIDED THE INVESTIGATION IN DETERMINING A CAUSE FOR THE EXPERIENCED CUFF MISS. TO ENSURE THIS TYPE OF EXPERIENCE IS NOT A RESULT OF A POTENTIAL PRODUCT RELATED DEFICIENCY, A 100% IN PROCESS TESTING OF DEVICES ARE PERFORMED TO ASSURE THERE IS NO NEEDLE DEFLECTION, WHICH MAY CAUSE THE EVENT REPORTED IN THIS CASE. A SAMPLING OF FINISHED DEVICES IS ALSO TESTED TO VERIFY THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE DEVICE. THE LOT HISTORY RECORD (LHR) FOR THIS PRODUCT WAS NOT REVIEWED AND A QUERY OF THE COMPLAINT-HANDLING DATABASE WAS NOT PERFORMED BECAUSE THE LOT NUMBER WAS NOT REPORTED AND THE PRODUCT WAS NOT RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. IN THIS INSTANCE, BASED ON THE INFORMATION RECEIVED WITH THIS REPORTED EVENT AND WITHOUT THE PRODUCT TO EXAMINE, A DEFINITIVE CAUSE FOR THE REPORTED EXPERIENCE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE ATTEMPTED ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF THE COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY AFTER AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, A CUFF MISS OCCURRED. A SECOND PROGLIDE WAS USED WITH THE SAME RESULTS. MANUAL COMPRESSION WAS APPLIED TO ACHIEVE HEMOSTASIS. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELAE. THOUGH REQUESTED, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-TEMECULA-CT |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |