PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2011-02123
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- March 29, 2011
- Date of Event
- March 4, 2011
- Report Date
- March 4, 2011
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- IL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE PROGLIDE DEVICE IS BEING FILED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDWATCH MFR NUMBER. THE DEVICE WAS RECEIVED. INVESTIGATION IS NOT YET COMPLETE. A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION.
(B)(4). EVALUATION SUMMARY: EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND IT WAS RETURNED DEPLOYED WITH THE INCORRECT PLUNGER NEEDLE ASSEMBLY. THE RECEIVED PLUNGER HAD ITS ANTERIOR NEEDLE ENGAGED WITH AN ANTERIOR CUFF WITH THE LINK AND POSTERIOR CUFF ATTACHED. HOWEVER, THE RECEIVED DEVICE STILL HAD ITS POSTERIOR CUFF LOADED IN THE POSTERIOR FOOT POCKET WITH THE LINK ATTACHED TO THE POSTERIOR CUFF. THE LINK HAD DISENGAGED FROM THE ANTERIOR CUFF AND THE ANTERIOR CUFF WAS NOT RETURNED WITH THE DEVICE. THE SUTURE WAS RETURNED COMPLETE AND FULLY FREE OF THE DEVICE WITH THE POSTERIOR NEEDLE TIP ATTACHED WITH NO DETECTED DAMAGE TO EITHER COMPONENT. THE FOOT DID NOT PRESENT ANY DAMAGE TO EITHER ITS ANTERIOR OR POSTERIOR FOOT. IT WAS VERIFIED THAT THE POSTERIOR CUFF WAS LOADED IN THE POSTERIOR FOOT POCKET. THE LINK WAS INSPECTED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE LINK HAD PULLED FROM THE ANTERIOR CUFF AND THE LINK HEAD REMAINED INTACT. A PROXY PLUNGER WAS USED IN PLACE OF THE RETURNED PLUNGER FOR PLUNGER/NEEDLE INSERTION TESTING FOR NEEDLE TRAJECTORY. THE TEST WAS SUCCESSFUL WITH BOTH NEEDLES ENTERING THEIR RESPECTIVE FOOT POCKET AND THE POSTERIOR CUFF WAS EJECTED FROM THE POSTERIOR FOOT. THE DETECTED LINK DETACHMENT FROM THE ANTERIOR CUFF IS ONLY AN OBSERVATION AND NOT A FAILURE MODE DUE TO ITS BEING THE RESULT OF THE POSTER NEEDLE TO CUFF MISS. THE OBSERVATIONS CONFIRM THE REPORTED FAILURE OF THE DEVICE TO DEPLOY ITS SUTURE. A CUFF-MISS CAN BE INFLUENCED BY MANY FACTORS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MANUFACTURING, FAILURE TO POSITION AND MAINTAIN THE DEVICE AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE THROUGHOUT DEPLOYMENT, ROTATING THE DEVICE AT ANY POINT DURING PLUNGER/NEEDLE DEPLOYMENT, DEPLOYMENT IN CHALLENGING ANATOMIES (E.G. HEAVY CALCIFIED ARTERIES, MORBIDLY OBESE PATIENTS, ETC.), AGGRESSIVELY DEPLOYING OR REMOVING THE PLUNGER AND/OR INADEQUATE POSITIONING OF THE FOOT AGAINST THE ARTERIAL WALL. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE ARTERIAL CALCIUM WHICH MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE DETECTED FAILURE MODE; HOWEVER, IT COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED. A REVIEW OF THE FINISHED DEVICE LOT HISTORY RECORDS DID NOT FIND ANY NON-CONFORMING MATERIAL RECORDS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS LOT. A ROOT CAUSE OF THE REPORTED EVENT COULD NOT BE DETERMINED AND THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY INDICATION OF A LOT SPECIFIC PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCY.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE ATTEMPTED ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF A CALCIFIED COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY AFTER AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, THE PROGLIDE DEVICE FAILED TO DEPLOY. A SECOND PROGLIDE DEVICE WAS USED WITH THE SAME RESULTS. IT IS UNKNOWN HOW HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUALE. THOUGH REQUESTED, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 010166H |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |