MULTI-LINK 8
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2011-02062
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- March 28, 2011
- Date of Event
- February 25, 2011
- Report Date
- March 3, 2011
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- MAF
- PMA / PMN Number
- P020047
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FR
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). EVALUATION SUMMARY: ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED PRODUCT NOTED BLOOD ON THE BALLOON AND CONTRAST VISIBLE ON THE BALLOON, CONSISTENT WITH HANDLING. THE STENT IMPLANT WAS DISLODGED AND NOT RETURNED, CONFIRMING THE REPORTED EVENT. CRIMP MARKS WERE VISIBLE ON THE TIGHTLY FOLDED BALLOON BETWEEN THE MARKERS, SUGGESTING THAT THE STENT WAS ORIGINALLY POSITIONED CORRECTLY AND SECURELY AT THE TIME OF MANUFACTURE. THERE WAS BALLOON SHREDDING ON THE DISTAL TAPER AND PEELING AT THE DISTAL END OF THE BALLOON. THERE WAS A KINK IN THE DISTAL SHAFT 6.8 CM PROXIMAL TO THE PROXIMAL SEAL. THERE MULTIPLE BENDS IN THE HYPOTUBE 5 CM DISTAL TO THE STRAIN RELIEF TUBING FOR A LENGTH OF 55 CM. SINCE THIS DAMAGE WAS NOT REPORTED IN THE INCIDENT INFORMATION, THE KINK AND BENDS MAY HAVE OCCURRED DURING THE PROCEDURE OR DURING PACKAGING, HANDLING AND RETURN TO ABBOTT VASCULAR FOR ANALYSIS. THE INNER DIAMETER OF THE PROTECTIVE SHEATH WAS MEASURED AND MET MANUFACTURING CRITERIA. POTENTIAL FACTORS THAT CAN CONTRIBUTE TO STENT DISLODGEMENT OUTSIDE THE BODY PRIOR TO USE MAY INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, IMPROPER OR INADEQUATE CRIMPING AT THE TIME OF MANUFACTURE, POSITIVE PRESSURE DURING PREPARATION OF THE STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS), NEGATIVE PRESSURE DURING SHEATH REMOVAL, FORCED SHEATH REMOVAL, OR HANDLING OF THE STENT DURING DEVICE PREPARATION. TO ENSURE THIS IS NOT THE RESULT OF A MANUFACTURING DEFICIENCY, ALL SDS ARE INSPECTED FOR PROPER STENT PLACEMENT, STENT DAMAGE AND CRIMPED STENT OUTER DIAMETER. ADDITIONALLY, A SAMPLING OF UNITS IS DESTRUCTIVELY TESTED PRIOR TO RELEASE TO VERIFY STENT DISLODGEMENT FORCE. RETURN OF THE DISLODGED STENT MAY HAVE AIDED IN THE INVESTIGATION AND DETERMINATION OF CAUSE. IN THIS CASE, IT IS POSSIBLE THE PROTECTIVE SHEATH WAS INADVERTENTLY HANDLED DURING REMOVAL, RESULTING IN THE STENT DISLODGING AND THE NOTED BALLOON SHREDDING. ALTHOUGH BALLOON PEELING OR SHREDDING IS OCCASIONALLY SEEN ON MANUFACTURING PRODUCTION LINES, IT IS MORE LIKELY THAT THE BALLOON PEELING OCCURRED DURING HANDLING OF THE STENT AS THERE WAS NO DAMAGE OR PEELING NOTED TO THE BALLOON IN THE CASE INFORMATION. TO HELP ENSURE THAT THE BALLOON SHREDDING IS NOT A RESULT OF A MANUFACTURING DEFICIENCY, ALL SDS ARE VISUALLY INSPECTED FOR BALLOON SHREDDING. A CONCLUSIVE CAUSE FOR THE STENT DISLODGEMENT COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. A REVIEW OF THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURING RECORDS DID NOT REVEAL ANY NON-CONFORMING MATERIAL RECORDS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS LOT. ADDITIONALLY, A QUERY OF THE COMPLAINT-HANDLING DATABASE WAS PERFORMED AND THERE HAS BEEN NO OTHER INCIDENTS REPORTED FOR THIS LOT. ALL STENT DELIVERY SYSTEMS ARE VISUALLY INSPECTED ONLINE FOR STENT PLACEMENT. ADDITIONALLY, A SAMPLING OF UNITS IS DESTRUCTIVELY TESTED TO VERIFY STENT DISLODGEMENT FORCE.
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. EVALUATION SUMMARY: ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED PRODUCT NOTED BLOOD ON THE BALLOON AND CONTRAST VISIBLE ON THE BALLOON, CONSISTENT WITH HANDLING. THE STENT IMPLANT WAS DISLODGED AND NOT RETURNED, CONFIRMING THE REPORTED EVENT. CRIMP MARKS WERE VISIBLE ON THE TIGHTLY FOLDED BALLOON BETWEEN THE MARKERS, SUGGESTING THAT THE STENT WAS ORIGINALLY POSITIONED CORRECTLY AND SECURELY AT THE TIME OF MANUFACTURE. THERE WAS BALLOON SHREDDING ON THE DISTAL TAPER AND PEELING AT THE DISTAL END OF THE BALLOON. THERE WAS A KINK IN THE DISTAL SHAFT 6.8 CM PROXIMAL TO THE PROXIMAL SEAL. THERE WERE MULTIPLE BENDS IN THE HYPOTUBE 5 CM DISTAL TO THE STRAIN RELIEF TUBING FOR A LENGTH OF 55 CM. SINCE THIS DAMAGE WAS NOT REPORTED IN THE INCIDENT INFORMATION, THE KINK AND BENDS MAY HAVE OCCURRED DURING PACKAGING, HANDLING, AND RETURN TO ABBOTT VASCULAR FOR ANALYSIS. THE INNER DIAMETER OF THE PROTECTIVE SHEATH WAS MEASURED AND MET MANUFACTURING CRITERIA. POTENTIAL FACTORS THAT CAN CONTRIBUTE TO STENT DISLODGEMENT OUTSIDE THE BODY PRIOR TO USE MAY INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, IMPROPER OR INADEQUATE CRIMPING AT THE TIME OF MANUFACTURE, POSITIVE PRESSURE DURING PREPARATION OF THE STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS), NEGATIVE PRESSURE DURING SHEATH REMOVAL, FORCED SHEATH REMOVAL, OR HANDLING OF THE STENT DURING DEVICE PREPARATION. RETURN OF THE DISLODGED STENT MAY HAVE AIDED IN THE INVESTIGATION AND DETERMINATION OF CAUSE. IN THIS CASE, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE STENT DISLODGEMENT AND THE NOTED BALLOON SHREDDING OCCURRED WHEN THE PROTECTIVE SHEATH WAS REMOVED. A CONCLUSIVE CAUSE FOR THE STENT DISLODGEMENT COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. A REVIEW OF THE FINISHED DEVICE LOT HISTORY RECORDS DID NOT REVEAL ANY NONCONFORMING MATERIAL RECORDS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS LOT WHICH COULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. ALL STENT DELIVERY SYSTEMS ARE VISUALLY INSPECTED ONLINE FOR STENT PLACEMENT. ADDITIONALLY, A SAMPLING OF UNITS IS DESTRUCTIVELY TESTED TO VERIFY STENT DISLODGEMENT FORCE.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PREPARATION OF THE RX MULTI-LINK 8 STENT SYSTEM, AFTER REMOVAL OF THE PROTECTIVE SHEATH, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT HAD DISLODGED FROM THE BALLOON. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THERE WAS NO SIGNIFICANT CLINICAL DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. A NEW MULTI-LINK 8 STENT SYSTEM WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MULTI-LINK 8 | CORONARY STENT SYSTEM | MAF | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 0022441 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |