PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2011-01781
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- March 16, 2011
- Date of Event
- February 22, 2011
- Report Date
- February 22, 2011
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- SZ
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). EVALUATION SUMMARY: EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND IT WAS PARTIALLY DEPLOYED. THE POSTERIOR CUFF WAS CAPTURED AND ATTACHED TO THE NEEDLE TIP. THE COMPLETE SUTURE HAD BEEN PULLED DISTALLY OUT OF THE DEVICE. THE ANTERIOR CUFF REMAINED IN THE FOOT POCKET WITH ITS TABS INTACT. NO NEEDLE STRIKE MARKS WERE DETECTED AT THE ANTERIOR FOOT POCKET. THIS INDICATES THE NEEDLE WAS DEFLECTED AWAY FROM THE POCKET DURING DEPLOYMENT. AN ANTERIOR CUFF MISS OCCURRED AS EVIDENCED BY THE ANTERIOR CUFF REMAINING IN THE FOOT POCKET. DURING TESTING THE PLUNGER WAS RE-INSERTED TO TEST THE NEEDLE TRAJECTORY, DEPTH AND MANDREL TRAVEL AND THE RESULTS WERE ACCEPTABLE. THE ANTERIOR CUFF WAS ALSO CAPTURED DURING TESTING. THERE WAS NO MANUFACTURING OR QUALITY INSPECTION DEFICIENCY DETECTED. A CUFF-MISS CAN BE INFLUENCED BY MANY FACTORS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MANUFACTURING, FAILURE TO POSITION AND MAINTAIN THE DEVICE AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE THROUGHOUT DEPLOYMENT, ROTATING THE DEVICE AT ANY POINT DURING PLUNGER/NEEDLE DEPLOYMENT, DEPLOYMENT IN CHALLENGING ANATOMIES (E.G. HEAVY CALCIFIED ARTERIES, MORBIDLY OBESE PATIENTS, ETC.), AGGRESSIVELY DEPLOYING OR REMOVING THE PLUNGER AND/OR INADEQUATE POSITIONING OF THE FOOT AGAINST THE ARTERIAL WALL. BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION FINDINGS, THE PROBABLE ROOT CAUSE FOR THE ANTERIOR CUFF MISS AND SUBSEQUENT FAILURE TO ACHIEVE HEMOSTASIS IS DUE TO NEEDLE DEFLECTION DURING PLUNGER DEPLOYMENT POSSIBLY CAUSED BY INTERACTION WITH ANATOMY OR A FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A STABLE POSITION OF THE DEVICE WITH RESPECT TO THE TISSUE TRACT DURING NEEDLE DEPLOYMENT. REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD FOR THIS LOT DID NOT PRODUCE ANY FINDINGS RELEVANT TO THIS REPORT.
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE DEVICE WAS RECEIVED. INVESTIGATION IS NOT YET COMPLETE. A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL ADDITIONAL RELEVANT INFORMATION.
THE ATTEMPTED VESSEL CLOSURE PROCEDURE WAS DONE AFTER AN INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE IN THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE ATTEMPTED ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF A MILDLY CALCIFIED RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY AFTER AN INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, WHEN THE NEEDLES WERE PULLED OUT OF THE DEVICE NO SUTURES WERE PRESENT. THE SYSTEM WAS CHANGED OVER THE WIRE FOR A NON-ABBOTT DEVICE AND HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELAE. THOUGH REQUESTED, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 910126H |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention | REOPRO| HEPARIN |