NI
Report
- Report Number
- 2015691-2024-06926
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- September 9, 2024
- Date of Event
- January 1, 2009
- Report Date
- October 15, 2024
- Manufacturer
- EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
- Product Code
- DYE
- PMA / PMN Number
- NI
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
H11: ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE: ARTICLE CITATION: HECHT S, ZENSES AS, BERNARD J, TASTET L, COTE N, DE FREITAS CAMPOS GUIMARAES L, PARADIS JM, BEAUDOIN J, O'CONNOR K, BERNIER M, DUMONT E, KALAVROUZIOTIS D, DELAROCHELLIERE R, MOHAMMADI S, CLAVEL MA, RODES-CABAU J, SALAUN E, PIBAROT P. HEMODYNAMIC AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN REDO-SURGICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT VS. TRANSCATHETER VALVE-IN-VALVE. STRUCT HEART. 2022 OCT 28;6(6):100106. DOI: 10.1016/J.SHJ.2022.100106. PMID: 37288124; PMCID: PMC10242565. THIS IS ONE OF FIVE MANUFACTURER REPORTS BEING SUBMITTED FOR THIS ARTICLE. RELATED REPORT NUMBERS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS SUBMITTED FOR THIS ARTICLE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION, NO OTHER DETAILS REGARDING THIS EVENT, OR WHAT COMORBIDITIES THE PATIENT HAD, WERE PROVIDED. ATTEMPTS TO RETRIEVE THE DEVICE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. THE DATES OF THE EVENTS ARE UNKNOWN; HOWEVER, THE ARTICLE PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING DATE RANGE (FROM 2009 UNTIL 2017). THEREFORE, 1-JAN-2009 IS USED AS THE OCCURRENCE DATE. THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL IN PROGRESS; THEREFORE, A CONCLUSION HAS YET TO BE ESTABLISHED. A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY UPON INVESTIGATION COMPLETION. EDWARDS WILL CONTINUE TO REVIEW AND MONITOR ALL REPORTED EVENTS. TRENDS ARE MONITORED ON A MONTHLY BASIS AND IF ACTION IS REQUIRED, APPROPRIATE INVESTIGATION WILL BE PERFORMED.
UPDATED SECTION H6 (INVESTIGATION FINDINGS AND INVESTIGATION CONCLUSIONS) ADDED INFORMATION TO SECTION H10 (RELATED REPORT NUMBERS). H11. ADDITIONAL NARRATIVE/DATA: THE SERIAL NUMBER WAS NOT PROVIDED. THEREFORE, THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD (DHR) COULD NOT BE REVIEWED. IN ADDITION, THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED TO EDWARDS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION, AND NO IMAGES OR MEDICAL RECORDS WERE PROVIDED. STRUCTURAL VALVE DETERIORATION (SVD) IS A LOGICAL AND EXPECTED CONSEQUENCE OF THE CHEMICAL, MECHANICAL, AND IMMUNOLOGICAL PROCESSES ASSOCIATED WITH BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVES IMPLANTATION. THE COMMON ENDPOINT OF ALL THESE FACTORS IS CALCIFICATION AND DEGRADATION. SVD IS AN ACQUIRED CONDITION, INTRINSIC TO BIOPROSTHETIC VALVES, CHARACTERIZED BY DETERIORATION OF THE LEAFLETS OR SUPPORTING STRUCTURES, LEADING TO THICKENING, CALCIFICATION, TEARING, OR DISRUPTION OF THE PROSTHETIC VALVE MATERIALS. THESE CHANGES RESULT IN VALVULAR DYSFUNCTION MANIFESTING AS STENOSIS AND/OR REGURGITATION WITH A CONSEQUENT DROP IN HEMODYNAMIC EFFICACY OF THE VALVE. PRIOR INVESTIGATIONS AND EXTENSIVE LITERATURE REVIEW HAVE SHOWN THAT SVD IS PREDOMINANTLY RELATED TO PATIENT FACTORS AND IMPLANT DURATION RATHER THAN TO MANUFACTURING ISSUES. EVENTS RELATED TO DEVICE DESIGN, MANUFACTURING, OR USE ERROR TEND TO MANIFEST AT AN EARLIER IMPLANT DURATION. A DEFINITIVE ROOT CAUSE CANNOT BE CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINED; HOWEVER, PATIENT FACTORS LIKELY CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED.
THROUGH REVIEW OF MEDICAL ARTICLE "HEMODYNAMIC AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN REDO-SURGICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT VS. TRANSCATHETER VALVE-IN-VALVE", THE FOLLOWING EVENT(S) WAS/WERE IDENTIFIED AS PERTAINING TO AN EDWARDS DEVICE: THREE (3) PATIENTS WITH PERIMOUNT VALVES IMPLANTED IN THE AORTIC POSITION UNDERWENT REDO-SURGICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT (SAVR) DUE TO STRUCTURAL VALVE DETERIORATION AFTER AN UNKNOWN IMPLANT DURATION.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1588230 | NI | REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE | DYE | EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES | NI |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Unknown | Required Intervention| L| H |