OT ULTRALINK METER
Report
- Report Number
- 2939301-2011-01991
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- March 8, 2011
- Report Date
- February 25, 2011
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN INC.
- Product Code
- NBW
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- PA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
FOLLOW-UP # 1 (03/18/2011)-DEVICE EVALUATION: THE METER INVOLVED WITH THIS COMPLAINT HAS BEEN RETURNED AND EVALUATED BY LIFESCAN PRODUCT ANALYSIS WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: THE METER HAS PASSED TESTING WITH NO FAULTS FOUND. IF LIFESCAN OBTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS COMPLAINT, A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED. AT THIS TIME, LIFESCAN CONSIDERS THIS MATTER CLOSED.
LIFESCAN (LFS) HAS REQUESTED RETURN OF THE SUBJECT PRODUCT(S) FOR EVALUATION. IF THE PRODUCT(S) ARE RETURNED, LFS WILL EVALUATE IT/THEM AND INFORM FDA OF PRODUCT(S) THAT DO NOT PASS INSPECTION IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT. 510(K) # IS K073231.
ON (B)(6) 2011, THE LAY USER/ PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) ALLEGING HER ONETOUCH ULTRALINK METER READ INACCURATELY ERRATIC WHEN COMPARING BLOOD GLUCOSE RESULTS TAKEN ONE AFTER ANOTHER. THE MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE SPECIALIST (MSS) SPOKE WITH THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2011 AND OBTAINED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. THE MSS WAS ADVISED THE PATIENT TESTS HER BLOOD GLUCOSE 10X A DAY AND MANAGES HER DIABETES WITH NOVOLOG INSULIN. THE ALLEGED ISSUE BEGAN ON (B)(6) 2011 AT 730PM. THE PATIENT REPORTED BLOOD GLUCOSE RESULTS OF "300 AND 140 MG/DL" WITH THE SUBJECT METER, PERFORMED WITHIN 20 MINUTES OF EACH OTHER. BASED ON STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, THE CALCULATED DIFFERENCE OF THESE GLUCOSE RESULTS EXCEEDS THE EXPECTED VALUE OF <=20% AND/ OR <=20 MG/DL. THE PATIENT DENIED MAKING CHANGES TO HER DIABETES MANAGEMENT ROUTINE. ABOUT 15 MINUTES AFTER THE START OF THE ALLEGED PRODUCT ISSUE, THE PATIENT CLAIMED SHE FELT HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE SYMPTOM OF BLURRY VISION. THE PATIENT STATED SHE TREATED SELF WITH AN INCREASED DOSE OF INSULIN (AMOUNT NOT SPECIFIED). THE PATIENT STATED SHE OBTAINED A HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE RESULT ON ANOTHER DEVICE; HOWEVER, DID NOT SPECIFY THE RESULT OBTAINED. AT THE TIME OF TROUBLESHOOTING, THE CUSTOMER CARE ADVOCATE (CCA) NOTED THE METER WAS SET TO THE CORRECT UNIT OF MEASUREMENT AND AN APPROVED SAMPLE SITE WAS USED FOR TESTING. THE PATIENT DID NOT HAVE CONTROL SOLUTION TO TEST THE SUBJECT METER. REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS WERE SENT TO THE PATIENT. THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT THE PRODUCT CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO A SERIOUS INJURY. GIVEN THE SHORT TIME BETWEEN THE ONSET OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE AND THE REPORTED SYMPTOMS, IT IS UNLIKELY THE PRODUCT ISSUE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED SYMPTOMS. IN ADDITION, THE PATIENT'S SYMPTOMS AND TREATMENT CORRELATED WITH THE REPORTED LFS METER RESULT. HOWEVER, THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE SUBJECT METER DID NOT MEET LFS' ACCURACY CRITERIA.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OT ULTRALINK METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN INC. | 3082527 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 YR |