FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

PROSTAR XL SUTURE-MEDIATED CLOSURE

MDR report key: 2001829 · Received February 25, 2011

Report

Report Number
2024168-2011-01216
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
February 25, 2011
Date of Event
January 24, 2011
Report Date
February 2, 2011
Manufacturer
AV-TEMECULA-CT
Product Code
MGB
PMA / PMN Number
P960043
Adverse Event
Yes
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
SP
Reporter Occupation
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

(B)(4). (DATE OF EVENT): THE FACILITY REPORTER INDICATED THE EVENT OCCURRED 1.5 WEEKS PRIOR TO THE DATE IT WAS REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE. THE DATE OF (B)(6) 2011 IS BEING USED AS BEST ESTIMATE DATE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED. THE LOT NUMBER WAS NOT IDENTIFIED; THEREFORE, A DEVICE HISTORY RECORD REVIEW COULD NOT BE PERFORMED. THE TWO OTHER PROSTAR DEVICES ARE BEING REPORTED UNDER SEPARATE MEDWATCH REPORTS.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN, TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROSTAR XL DEVICE, ATTEMPTED ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF A COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY AFTER AN AORTIC PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, WHEN THE NEEDLES WERE TAKEN OUT AND THE KNOT WAS DONE, THE PROSTAR SUTURES CAUGHT SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND A SECOND AND THIRD PROSTAR XL DEVICES WERE ATTEMPTED, BUT WITH THE SAME RESULTS. HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED USING A FOURTH PROSTAR WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES. THE PHYSICIAN CLARIFIED THAT THE VESSEL WAS NOT PROPERLY PREPPED PRIOR TO INTRODUCE THE INITIAL THREE PROSTAR DEVICES, AND THAT IS WHY THE PROSTARS FAILED. THEN THE SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE WAS PROPERLY CUT AND THE FOURTH PROSTAR WAS SUCCESSFUL. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS. THOUGH REQUESTED, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
1 PROSTAR XL SUTURE-MEDIATED CLOSURE SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE MGB AV-TEMECULA-CT

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 Required Intervention