FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

PRECISION

MDR report key: 1995935 · Received January 21, 2011

Report

Report Number
3006630150-2011-00102
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
January 21, 2011
Date of Event
December 22, 2010
Report Date
December 28, 2010
Manufacturer
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
Product Code
LGW
PMA / PMN Number
P030017
Removal / Correction Number
NA
Adverse Event
Yes
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
IL, US
Reporter Occupation
PHYSICIAN

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT'S IPG WAS REPLACED ON (B)(6) 2011. THE PADDLE LEAD REMAINS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT IS REPORTEDLY DOING WELL.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE PATIENT'S SHOCKING SENSATION WAS BELIEVED TO BE CAUSED BY THE PADDLE LEAD TUGGING AT SCAR TISSUE. PRODUCT ANALYSIS FOR IPG (S/N (B)(4)) INDICATED THAT THE COMPLAINT OF OVERSTIMULATION WAS NOT CONFIRMED. HOWEVER, REVIEW OF BATTERY PROFILE INDICATED THAT MAXIMUM BATTERY DEPLETION RATE AFTER EXPLANT DATE WAS 26.8 MV PER DAY WITH THE STIMULATION TURNED OFF, WHICH IS BEYOND THE EXPECTED RANGE. THE AIC-U1 DAMAGE RESULTED IN THE ABNORMAL BATTERY DEPLETION RATE OF THE IPG. MONOPOLAR ELECTROCAUTERY IS A KNOWN SOURCE OF HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSIENT SIGNAL AND CURRENT COMPANY LABELING WARNS AGAINST THE USE OF MONOPOLAR ELECTROCAUTERY (PHYSICIAN'S IMPLANT MANUAL (B)(4)).

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

ADD'L SUSPECT MEDICAL DEVICE COMPONENTS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT: MODEL #- SC-1110-02, SERIAL #- (B)(4), DESCRIPTION - IPG KIT (WITHOUT PULL-THROUGH TUNNELER).

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE PATIENT WILL NOT UNDERGO A REVISION. THE PHYSICIAN INDICATED THAT HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM IS SO THERE IS NO SENSE OF URGENCY. BSN WILL BE NOTIFIED IF OR WHEN THE REVISION WILL TAKE PLACE. A REVIEW OF THE MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTATION OF THE DEVICES FOUND THAT NO ANOMALIES OR DEVIATIONS POTENTIALLY RELATED TO THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING MANUFACTURING.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

A REPORT WAS RECEIVED THAT WHEN THE STIMULATION IS ON THE PATIENT FEELS SHOCKING SENSATIONS DURING POSTURAL CHANGES AND ALSO WHEN THE IPG IS PALPATED. THE PATIENT ALSO REPORTED RAPID BATTERY DEPLETION AFTER RECENTLY UNDERGOING A PULSED RF PROCEDURE. A BSN FIELD CLINICAL ENGINEER (FCE) MET WITH THE PATIENT AND ANALYZED THE DEVICE AND DETERMINED THE CAUSE OF THE SENSATIONS WERE THE PADDLE LEAD. REPROGRAMMING WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL AND A REVISION SURGERY IS NOW RECOMMENDED.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

A REPORT WAS RECEIVED THAT WHEN THE STIMULATION IS ON THE PATIENT FEELS SHOCKING SENSATIONS DURING POSTURAL CHANGES AND ALSO WHEN THE IPG IS PALPATED. THE PATIENT ALSO REPORTED RAPID BATTERY DEPLETION AFTER RECENTLY UNDERGOING A PULSED RF PROCEDURE. A BSN FIELD CLINICAL ENGINEER (FCE) MET WITH THE PATIENT AND ANALYZED THE DEVICE AND DETERMINED THE CAUSE OF THE SENSATIONS WERE THE PADDLE LEAD. REPROGRAMMING WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL AND A REVISION SURGERY IS NOW RECOMMENDED.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

A REPORT WAS RECEIVED THAT WHEN THE STIMULATION IS ON THE PATIENT FEELS SHOCKING SENSATIONS DURING POSTURAL CHANGES AND ALSO WHEN THE IPG IS PALPATED. THE PATIENT ALSO REPORTED RAPID BATTERY DEPLETION AFTER RECENTLY UNDERGOING A PULSED RF PROCEDURE. A BSN FIELD CLINICAL ENGINEER (FCE) MET WITH THE PATIENT AND ANALYZED THE DEVICE AND DETERMINED THE CAUSE OF THE SENSATIONS WERE THE PADDLE LEAD. REPROGRAMMING WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL AND A REVISION SURGERY IS NOW RECOMMENDED.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

A REPORT WAS RECEIVED THAT WHEN THE STIMULATION IS ON, THE PT FEELS SHOCKING SENSATIONS DURING POSTURAL CHANGES AND ALSO WHEN THE IPG IS PALPATED. THE PT ALSO REPORTED RAPID BATTERY DEPLETION AFTER RECENTLY UNDERGOING A PULSED RF PROCEDURE. A BSN FIELD CLINICAL ENGINEER (FCE) MET WITH THE PT AND ANALYZED THE DEVICE AND DETERMINED THE CAUSE OF THE SENSATIONS WERE THE PADDLE LEAD. REPROGRAMMING WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL AND A REVISION SURGERY IS NOW RECOMMENDED.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
1 PRECISION SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LGW BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION SC-8120-70 NA

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 44 YR Required Intervention