NEUROPEN NEUROENDOSCOPES
Report
- Report Number
- 2021898-2024-00096
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- August 8, 2024
- Date of Event
- June 24, 2012
- Report Date
- August 8, 2024
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC NEUROSURGERY
- Product Code
- GWG
- PMA / PMN Number
- K003914
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- IS
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
MEDTRONIC SUBMITS THIS REPORT TO COMPLY WITH FDA REGULATIONS 21 CFR PARTS 4 AND 803. MEDTRONIC HAS MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO PROVIDE AS MUCH RELEVANT INFORMATION AS IS AVAILABLE TO THE COMPANY AS OF THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THIS REPORT. THIS REPORT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ADMISSION OR A CONCLUSION BY FDA, MEDTRONIC, OR ITS EMPLOYEES THAT THE DEVICE, MEDTRONIC, OR ITS EMPLOYEE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT DESCRIBED IN THE REPORT. ANY REQUIRED FIELDS THAT ARE UNPOPULATED ARE BLANK BECAUSE THE INFORMATION IS CURRENTLY UNKNOWN OR UNAVAILABLE. MEDTRONIC WILL SUBMIT A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT IF ADDITIONAL RELEVANT INFORMATION BECOMES KNOWN.
ROTH J, CONSTANTINIS. SELECTIVE USE OF INTRA-CATHETER ENDOSCOPIC-ASSISTED VENTRICULAR CATHETER PLACEMENT: INDICATIONS AND OUTCOME. CHILDS NERV SYST. 2012 AUG;28(8):1163-9. DOI: 10.1007/S00381-012-1838-1. EPUB 2012 JUN 24. PMID: 22729626. ABSTRACT PURPOSE: IN A PREVIOUS WELL-CONTROLLED STUDY, ROUTINE ENDOSCOPIC-GUIDED PLACEMENT OF VENTRICULAR CATHETERS DID NOT SEEM TO DECREASE THE RATE OF SHUNT FAILURE OR PROXIMAL SHUNT MALFUNCTION. SINCE THIS STUDY WAS PUBLISHED, THIS TECHNIQUE DOES NOT SEEM TO GAIN MUCH ACCEPTANCE. HOWEVER, IN SELECTED CASES, IT MAY ASSIST IN ACCURACY AND SAFETY. WE THEREFORE HAVE ANALYZED OUR EXPERIENCE WITH SELECTIVE INTRACATHETER ENDOSCOPIC USE FOR VENTRICULAR HARDWARE PLACEMENT. METHODS: WE RETROSPECTIVELY COLLECTED CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL DATA ON ALL CHILDREN UNDERGOING INTRA-CATHETER ENDOSCOPICASSISTED VENTRICULAR CATHETER PLACEMENT. RESULTS: DURING 25 MONTHS, 16 CHILDREN (AGES 3 MONTHS¿18 YEARS) UNDERWENT 18 PROCEDURES USING THE ABOVE TECHNIQUE. INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY WERE: PROXIMAL SHUNT MALFUNCTION WITH RELATIVELY SMALL VENTRICLES (TEN CHILDREN), PROXIMAL SHUNT MALFUNCTION WITH INTRAVENTRICULAR MEMBRANES (ONE CHILD), PROXIMAL SHUNT MALFUNCTION WITH DISTORTED VENTRICLES (ONE CHILD), NEW SHUNT WITH SMALL TO MEDIUM SIZED VENTRICLES (TWO CHILDREN), OR LARGE VENTRICLES AND A LOCULATED FOURTH VENTRICLE SECONDARY TO AN AQUEDUCTAL WEB (TWO CHILDREN). FOURTEEN PROCEDURES WERE TECHNICALLY SUCCESSFUL. THE CATHETER WAS PROPERLY LOCATED ON POSTOPERATIVE IMAGING IN 13 PROCEDURES. FRAMELESS NAVIGATION WAS USED IN THREE CASES. CONCLUSIONS: SELECTIVE USE OF INTRA-CATHETER ENDOSCOPICASSISTED PROXIMAL SHUNT PLACEMENT IS USEFUL AND MAY BE INDICATED IN SMALL OR DISTORTED VEN TRICLES AND IN CASES WHEN FENESTRATION OF AN INTRAVENTRICULAR MEMBRANE OR AQUEDUCTAL WEB IS INDICATED. THE MAIN VALUE OF SUCH A TECHNIQUE IS THE ABILITY TO ACCURATELY PLACE THE CATHETER TIP WITHIN DISTORTED OR SMALL VENTRICLES. LARGER SERIES ARE NEEDED TO REFINE THESE INDICATIONS. EVENTS: IN ONE CASE, THE ENDOSCOPIC VISUAL QUALITY WAS POOR AND THE PROXIMAL CATHETER WAS MALPOSITIONED LEADING TO AN EARLY SHUNT MALFUNCTION, THUS THE CHILD UNDERWENT AN ADDITIONAL EARLY PROXIMAL REVISION USING ENDOSCOPIC ASSISTANCE, WHICH WAS THIS TIME SUCCESSFUL. THERE WERE 3 SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS. TWO OF THEM WERE INTRAPARENCHYMAL CATHETER, LEADING TO IMMEDIATE REVISION. ONE OF THEM WAS ASYMPTOMATIC BLEED FROM OLD CATHETER REMOVAL.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1530992 | NEUROPEN NEUROENDOSCOPES | ENDOSCOPE, NEUROLOGICAL | GWG | MEDTRONIC NEUROSURGERY | 2120-025 | UNKNOWN |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Unknown | Hospitalization| R |