OT ULTRAMINI METER
Report
- Report Number
- 2939301-2011-01413
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- February 16, 2011
- Date of Event
- February 3, 2011
- Report Date
- February 6, 2011
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN INC.
- Product Code
- NBW
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
FOLLOW-UP # 1 ((B)(4) 2012)-DEVICE EVALUATION: THE METER INVOLVED WITH THIS COMPLAINT HAS BEEN RETURNED AND EVALUATED BY PRODUCT ANALYSIS ON (B)(4) 2012 WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: THE METER INVOLVED WITH THIS COMPLAINT FAILED TESTING. THE METER WAS FOUND TO HAVE EEPROM FAILURE AT U6. A DHR (DEVICE HISTORY RECORD) WAS COMPLETED FOR THIS PRODUCT AND NO DEVIATIONS, NON-CONFORMANCES, OR REWORKS WERE OBSERVED. THE RETAIN TEST STRIPS ALSO PASSED ALL TESTING. IF LIFESCAN OBTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS COMPLAINT, A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED. AT THIS TIME, LIFESCAN CONSIDERS THIS MATTER CLOSED.
LIFESCAN (LFS) HAS REQUESTED RETURN OF THE SUBJECT PRODUCT(S) FOR EVALUATION. IF THE PRODUCT(S) ARE RETURNED, LFS WILL EVALUATE IT/THEM AND INFORM FDA OF PRODUCT(S) THAT DO NOT PASS INSPECTION IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT. 510(K) # IS K061118.
ON (B)(6) 2011, THE LAY USER/ PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) ALLEGING HER ONETOUCH ULTRAMINI METER DISPLAYED AN "ER 5" MESSAGE. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE SPECIALIST (MSS) SPOKE WITH THE PATIENT TO OBTAIN AND VERIFY INFORMATION; HOWEVER, THE PATIENT DID NOT WANT TO ANSWER FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE ADVOCATE (CCA) DOCUMENTATION. THE ALLEGED ISSUE BEGAN ON THE MORNING OF (B)(6) 2011. THE CCA WAS ADVISED THE PATIENT MANAGES HER DIABETES WITH INSULIN (TYPE/ AMOUNT NOT SPECIFIED). IT IS NOT KNOWN WHAT ACTION THE PATIENT TOOK AT THE TIME OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE. THE PATIENT DID NOT SPECIFY DEVELOPING SYMPTOMS; HOWEVER, STATED EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) WAS CONTACTED THAT SAME MORNING. THE PATIENT STATED SHE WAS ADMINISTERED INTRAVENOUS (IV) GLUCOSE. THE PATIENT DID NOT SPECIFY WHETHER ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED FOR TESTING. AT THE TIME OF TROUBLESHOOTING, THE CCA WALKED THE PATIENT THROUGH A RETEST TO RESOLVE THE ALLEGED ISSUE. REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS WERE SENT TO THE PATIENT. THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY RECEIVED MEDICAL INTERVENTION FROM A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) AFTER THE REPORTED ISSUE BEGAN.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OT ULTRAMINI METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN INC. | 3056305 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 YR | Life Threatening| R |