DURAGEN 4X5 1 PACK CE
Report
- Report Number
- 1121308-2024-00031
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- July 17, 2024
- Report Date
- August 30, 2024
- Manufacturer
- INTEGRA - PRINCETON
- Product Code
- GXQ
- PMA / PMN Number
- K982180
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
DURAGEN ((B)(6)) WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AND LOT NUMBER INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED; THEREFORE, AN EVALUATION OF THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE PERFORMED, AND DEVICE HISTORY RECORD (DHR) COULD NOT BE REVIEWED. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: DURAGEN WAS NOT RETURNED; THEREFORE, AN EVALUATION OF THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE PERFORMED. SINCE NO LOT NUMBER WAS PROVIDED AS PART OF THE COMPLAINT REPORT, THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD (DHR) WAS NOT POSSIBLE AND NO RETAIN SAMPLE EVALUATION COULD BE PERFORMED. HOWEVER, A MEDICAL ASSESSMENT WAS PERFORMED WHICH CONCLUDED THE FOLLOWING: ¿BASED ON THE COMPLAINT INFORMATION RECEIVED TO DATE, THERE IS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT THE DURAGEN PRODUCT WAS CAUSAL TO THE EPIDURAL HEMATOMA, AS IT APPEARS TO BE PROCEDURALLY RELATED. SURGEONS SHALL DETERMINE, BASED ON THE PATIENT¿S UNDERLYING MEDICAL CONDITION AND SURGERY NEEDED, WHAT PRODUCTS OR INSTRUMENTATION TO USE AND THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE APPROACH TAKEN FOR OPTIMAL RESULTS. IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT ¿THE DOCTOR ASSUMED THAT NOT BEING ABLE TO PLACE TENTING SUTURE MAY POSSIBLY BE THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT¿. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT¿S OTHER RELEVANT MEDICAL HISTORY, INTRA-OPERATIVE PROCEDURES NOTES, AND PATIENT POST-OPERATIVE CARE WERE PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER. BASED ON THE PRODUCT¿S INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), DURAGEN IS AN ONLAY GRAFT AND DOES NOT REQUIRE SUTURES. HOWEVER, IF DESIRED, ATRAUMATIC STAY SUTURES MAY BE UTILIZED, BUT AS A PRECAUTION, TENSIONLESS SUTURING TECHNIQUE MUST BE USED TO PREVENT TEARING THE DURAGEN. IN ADDITION, CLOSED SUCTION DRAINAGE IS SUGGESTED FOR 1 TO 3 DAYS POSTOPERATIVELY. ACCORDING TO PRZEPIÓRKA ET AL., DURAL TENTING IS A WELL-KNOWN METHOD OF SUTURING THE DURA TO THE BONE OR PERICRANIUM AFTER CRANIOTOMY. THIS DECREASES THE EXTRADURAL SPACE WHERE EXTRADURAL HEMORRHAGE (EDH) COULD DEVELOP AND COMPRESS DURAL VESSELS, WHICH ARE POSSIBLE SOURCES OF EDH. HOWEVER, THE CURRENT NEED FOR DURAL TENTING SUTURES IN CONTEMPORARY NEUROSURGICAL PRACTICE HAS BEEN EXAMINED IN THE LITERATURE FOR YEARS. PREVIOUSLY, THESE TENSION SUTURES WERE INTENDED TO PREVENT BLOOD COLLECTING IN THE POTENTIAL SPACE BETWEEN THE SKULL AND THE DURA. IN THEORY, WITH MODERN HEMOSTASIS AND PROPER POSTOPERATIVE CARE, THIS TECHNIQUE SHOULD NOT BE NEEDED, AND THE SURGERY TIME CAN BE SHORTENED. UNFORTUNATELY, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE-BASED PROOF TO EITHER SUPPORT OR REJECT THIS HYPOTHESIS. IF ADDITIONAL RELEVANT INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE IN THE FUTURE, THIS COMPLAINT WILL BE REOPENED, AND THE RESPECTIVE EVALUATION PERFORMED. TRENDS WILL BE MONITORED FOR THIS AND SIMILAR ISSUES. AT PRESENT, WE CONSIDER THIS COMPLAINT TO BE CLOSED.
AN INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN INITIATED BASED ON THE REPORTED INFORMATION. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION, A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED.
N/A.
A FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURAGEN (ID4501I) WAS IMPLANTED TO A PATIENT WITH MENINGIOMA. A MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) WAS PERFORMED THE DAY AFTER THE IMPLANTATION AND SHOWED NO ABNORMALITY. TWO DAYS AFTER THE IMPLANTATION, EPIDURAL HEMATOMA WAS OBSERVED. REOPERATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HEMATOMA WAS REMOVED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT "THE DOCTOR ASSUMED THAT NOT BEING ABLE TO PLACE TENTING SUTURE MAY POSSIBLY BE THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT." THE EXACT IMPLANTATION DATE IS UNKNOWN, BUT IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INCIDENT OCCURRED IN (B)(6) 2023.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2149517 | DURAGEN 4X5 1 PACK CE | N/A | GXQ | INTEGRA - PRINCETON |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Unknown | Other |