ULTRAFLEX
Report
- Report Number
- 3005099803-2011-00064
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- January 14, 2011
- Date of Event
- December 24, 2010
- Report Date
- December 24, 2010
- Manufacturer
- BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
- Product Code
- ESW
- PMA / PMN Number
- K955347
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
THE RETURNED DEVICE PRESENTED WITH THE STENT PARTIALLY DEPLOYED BY ABOUT 55MM, WITH NO ISSUES NOTED TO THE CROCHET STITCHES. NO BENDS OR KINKS WERE NOTED ALONG THE DELIVERY CATHETER. DURING A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS, THERE WAS SOME INITIAL RESISTANCE WHEN RETRACTING THE SUTURE; HOWEVER, THE REMAINDER OF THE STENT COULD BE DEPLOYED. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WITH THE PROFILE OF THE STENT. THE CONDITION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPLAINT EVENT. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD (DHR) WAS PERFORMED; NO ANOMALIES WERE NOTED. A SEARCH OF THE COMPLAINT DATABASE REVEALED THAT NO SIMILAR COMPLAINTS EXIST FOR THE SPECIFIED LOT. A LABELING REVIEW WAS PERFORMED AND NO DEVIATION WAS FOUND.
THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE MANUFACTURER; HOWEVER, A FAILURE ANALYSIS HAS NOT YET BEEN COMPLETED. UPON RECEIPT OF THE FAILURE ANALYSIS, IF THERE IS ANY FURTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION FROM THAT REVIEW, A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED.
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ULTRAFLEX ESOPHAGEAL STENT WAS USED DURING A STENTING PROCEDURE WITHIN THE LOWER ESOPHAGUS ON (B)(6) 2010. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, AFTER ABOUT HALF OF THE STENT HAD BEEN DEPLOYED, THE PHYSICIAN ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE. DESPITE EXTRA EFFORTS PULLING ON THE SUTURE, THE REMAINDER OF THE STENT WOULD NOT DEPLOY. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT IN A PARTIALLY DEPLOYED STATE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED AT THIS TIME. THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THAT THE ANATOMY WAS NOT TORTUOUS. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT TYPE OF STENT ON (B)(6) 2010.
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ULTRAFLEX ESOPHAGEAL STENT WAS USED DURING A STENTING PROCEDURE WITHIN THE LOWER ESOPHAGUS ON (B)(6), 2010.ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, AFTER ABOUT HALF OF THE STENT HAD BEEN DEPLOYED, THE PHYSICIAN ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE. DESPITE EXTRA EFFORTS PULLING ON THE SUTURE, THE REMAINDER OF THE STENT WOULD NOT DEPLOY.THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT IN A PARTIALLY DEPLOYED STATE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED AT THIS TIME. THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THAT THE ANATOMY WAS NOT TORTUOUS.THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD.THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT TYPE OF STENT ON (B)(6), 2010.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ULTRAFLEX | PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL | ESW | BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY | M00514070 | 13215871 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |