TELIGEN
Report
- Report Number
- 2124215-2010-19988
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- January 4, 2011
- Date of Event
- October 11, 2010
- Report Date
- June 8, 2017
- Manufacturer
- GUIDANT CRM CLONMEL IRELAND
- Product Code
- LWP
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY TECHNICIAN/REPRESENTATIVE
Narratives
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED INDICATED THE PATIENT WAS BROUGHT IN FOR DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD (DFT) TESTING. VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION (VF) WAS INDUCED AND THE FIRST SHOCK CONVERTED THE RHYTHM AT 27 JOULES. THE PHYSICIAN SUSPECTED THAT THE ORIGINAL RHYTHM WAS AN ATRIAL FLUTTER OR SUPRAVENT VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (SVT) WITH ABERRANT CONDUCTION. DEVICE REPROGRAMMING OR AN ABLATION PROCEDURE PLANNED TO BE CONSIDERED IF THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED THIS RHYTHM AGAIN. THERE HAVE BEEN NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE DFT PROCEDURE.
THE BOSTON SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED HAVING AN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIST REVIEW THE ELECTROGRAM DATA BEFORE MAKING AND POTENTIAL PROGRAMMING CHANGES. THE PATIENT HAS A SCHEDULED APPOINTMENT TO SEE AN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIST, AND A BOSTON SCIENTIFIC FIELD REPRESENTATIVE WILL BE PRESENT DURING THE FOLLOW-UP TO MAKE ANY PROGRAMMING CHANGES, IF NEEDED. THIS EVENT WILL BE UPDATED IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE.
UPON RECEIPT AT OUR POST MARKET QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY, A THOROUGH EVALUATION OF THE DEVICE WAS PERFORMED. A VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE DEVICE HEADER AND CASE NOTED NO ANOMALIES. PIN GAUGE TESTING, DESIGNED TO VERIFY PROPER PORT DIMENSIONS, WAS COMPLETED. EACH PORT MEASURED AS EXPECTED. THE DEVICE WAS THEN EXPOSED TO SIMULATED HEART LOAD CONDITIONS, AND THE DEFIBRILLATION, PACING, AND SENSING FUNCTIONS WERE TESTED. IMPEDANCE TESTING WAS COMPLETED AND ALL MEASUREMENTS WERE WITHIN NORMAL LIMITS. THE DEVICE OPERATED APPROPRIATELY WITH NO INTERRUPTIONS IN THERAPY OUTPUT AT THE RETURNED PROGRAMMED SETTINGS. A SERIES OF ELECTRICAL TESTS WAS ALSO PERFORMED, AND AGAIN, NORMAL DEVICE FUNCTION WAS OBSERVED. ANALYSIS DID NOT IDENTIFY ANY DEVICE CHARACTERISTICS THAT WOULD HAVE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS.
APPROXIMATELY SIX YEARS LATER THE DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED AND RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THIS IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) PATIENT'S DEVICE DELIVERED ANTI-TACHYCARDIA PACING (ATP) AND MULTIPLE SHOCKS, WHICH MAY HAVE TEMPORARILY EXHAUSTED TACHYCARDIA THERAPY. THE BOSTON SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWED EPISODE ELECTROGRAMS, BUT WAS UNABLE TO CONCLUDE WHETHER THE SHOCKS WERE APPROPRIATE OR NOT. THE PATIENT'S RHYTHM SPONTANEOUSLY TERMINATED BEFORE MEDICAL HELP ARRIVED. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTEDLY SYMPTOMATIC ONLY AFTER THE DEVICE BEGAN DELIVERING THERAPY.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TELIGEN | IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR | LWP | GUIDANT CRM CLONMEL IRELAND | E110 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 71 YR | Hospitalization| L| R | 0185| E110| 4136 |