Description of Event or Problem · 1
REGARDING PRECISION EXTRA TEST STRIP MALFUNCTIONS. I HAVE BEEN USING THESE DAILY AS OUR GLUCOMETERS. I NOTICED THAT IF THERE ISN'T ENOUGH BLOOD DURING FIRST ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN FINGER STICK A FALSE READING WILL OCCUR. USUALLY LOW. OUR NURSING HOME OBTAINED NEW TEST STRIPS ON THE DAY OF THE RECALL. THE NEXT DAY, I HAD A PT WITH A LOW GLUCOSE READING OF 38 WITH CLINICAL SYMPTOMS. I RETESTED PT. FROM SAME BLOOD SOURCE A SECOND TIME AND OBTAINED A READING OF 181. KNOWING THIS PT AND HER CLINICAL SYMPTOMS I RETESTED AGAIN AND OBTAINED A READING OF 46. I TREATED THE PT; WAS TREATED FOR THE HYPOGLYCEMIC RXN. I HAD NOTICED THAT THERE WERE PROBLEMS WITH LOW READINGS FOR SOME TIME. THOUGHT IT WAS THE AGE OF EQUIPMENT OR A LOW BATTERY. I STILL BELIEVE THERE ARE PROBLEMS WITH THE PRECISION EXTRA GLUCOMETERS AND SHOULD BE FURTHER INVESTIGATED. I AM A REGISTERED NURSE IN (B)(6). PRECISION EXTRA GLUCOMETERS AND TEST STRIPS WITH NEW APPROVED LOT#'S CONTINUE TO HAVE UNRELIABLE AND OR FALSE READINGS. DATES OF USE: (B)(6) 2009 - (B)(6) 2010. DIAGNOSIS OR REASON FOR USE: DIABETES GLUCOSE. EVENT REAPPEARED AFTER REINTRODUCTION: YES.