RBC (RBX) SET, SPECTRA
Report
- Report Number
- 1722028-2010-00077
- Event Type
- Other
- Date Received
- December 17, 2010
- Date of Event
- April 27, 2009
- Report Date
- November 5, 2010
- Manufacturer
- CARIDIANBCT
- Product Code
- LKN
- PMA / PMN Number
- K9000105
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CA
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4) - VOLUME ISSUE. CLINICAL SPECIALIST ENTERED ALL THE DATA INTO A PREDICTION TOOL AND COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING UNUSUAL. THEIR STARTING NUMBERS SEEMED TO BE VERY CLOSE, BUT THE FINAL VALUES WERE OFF (INLET VOL. 1345 ML, REPLACE 1150 ML, REMOVE 1240 ML). THE REMOVE AND REPLACE VOLUMES WERE ABOUT RIGHT BUT THE INLET WAS ONLY ABOUT 60% OF 2311 ML. INSTEAD OF A 124 MIN PROCEDURE THE RUN ENDED AFTER 72 MIN. ASKED THE OPERATOR ABOUT FLOW RATES AND FOUND OUT THAT WHEN THEY RECORDED THE FIRST VALUES ABOUT 15 MINUTES INTO THE PROCEDURE, THE INLET PUMP RATE WAS 18.6, THE REPLACE PUMP RATE WAS 17.2 AND THE REMOVE PUMP RATE WAS 18.6. THESE NUMBERS DID NOT CORRELATE WITH MY CALCULATED NUMBERS AND DID NOT MAKE ANY SENSE. OPERATOR HAD DONE A BLOOD PRIME USING AN UNDILUTED RBC UNIT (58%). THE OPERATOR STATED THAT THEY START WITH AN ENTERED PT HCT BUT CHANGE TO THE RBC UNIT HCT DURING THE BLOOD PRIME AND THEN REVERT BACK TO THE PT HCT. ADVISED OPERATOR THAT WE DO NOT RECOMMEND CHANGING THE HCT DURING RBCX PROCEDURES. WE RECOMMEND TO EITHER DILUTE THE UNIT TO THE PT'S HCT AND THEREFORE ENTER THE PT'S HCT FOR THE BLOOD PRIME OR USE ALBUMIN TO PRIME AGAIN AND ENTER THE PT'S HCT. SHE RECEIVED AN INVALID REPLACEMENT VOLUME ALARM DURING THE BLOOD PRIME, BUT SHE HAD JUST CLEARED IT AND CONTINUED. SALINE RUN WAS PERFORMED WITH SAME INPUTS AND THE PROBLEM WAS DUPLICATED WHEN THE HCT WAS CHANGED. THE SAME ALARM ALSO OCCURRED. THIS CONFIRMED THAT THE HCT WAS CHANGED DURING THE BLOOD PRIME CAUSING THESE ARTIFICIALLY ELEVATED PUMP FLOW RATES. OPERATOR AGREED THAT THIS WAS OPERATOR ERROR. CONCLUSION: OPERATOR ERROR.
THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AS A RESULT OF CHANGES TO OUR MDR EVAL PROCESS. WE HAVE CHANGED OUR PROCESS TO BETTER ALIGN WITH CURRENT AGENCY POLICY. DURING RUN, CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY PERFORMED AN RBCX PROCEDURE ON A (B)(6) CHILD WITH SICKLE CELL. INSTEAD OF THE ENTERED TARGET ENDING HCT OF 30%, THE ACTUAL ENDING HCT WAS 44% (A SECOND SAMPLE SHOWED AN HCT OF 43%). THE OPERATOR HAD OBSERVED THAT APPROXIMATELY HALF-WAY THROUGH THE PROCEDURE TIME (124 MIN), THEY HAD ALMOST REPLACED THE ENTIRE ESTIMATED VOLUME (CALCULATED REPLACE VOLUME 1079, AT 60 MINUTES 950 ML HAD BEEN GIVEN). THE OPERATOR WANTED TO FIND OUT WHY THIS HAPPENED. THE COMPLAINANT WAS UNWILLING TO PROVIDE A PT IDENTIFIER. THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED DUE TO THE POTENTIAL FOR FLUID IMBALANCE DUE TO OPERATOR ERROR.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RBC (RBX) SET, SPECTRA | SEPARATOR, AUTOMATED, BLOOD CELL AND PL | LKN | CARIDIANBCT | 950000000 | UNK |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UNK | Required Intervention |