RENAL - DISPOSABLE
Report
- Report Number
- 1423500-2010-07355
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- December 29, 2010
- Date of Event
- December 1, 2010
- Report Date
- December 12, 2010
- Product Code
- KDJ
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- PO
- Reporter Occupation
- NURSE
Narratives
(B)(4). THE DEVICES INVOLVED IN THE INCIDENT WERE UNKNOWN. A BATCH REVIEW WILL NOT BE PERFORMED AS THE LOT NUMBER IS UNKNOWN. AS THE DATE OF ONSET OF THIS PERITONITIS EPISODE IS UNKNOWN AND PATIENTS DISCARD SUPPLIES AFTER EACH THERAPY, THE SAMPLE WAS NOT REQUESTED. A 510(K) NUMBER WILL NOT BE PROVIDED IN THE EMDR AS THE PRODUCT CODE AND LOT NUMBER ARE UNKNOWN. BAXTER HAS RECEIVED SIMILAR REPORTS FOR THE REPORTED PROBLEM. BAXTER WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR SIMILAR REPORTS TO DETERMINE IF FURTHER ACTIONS ARE REQUIRED.
ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT BEGAN TREATMENT WITH EXTRANEAL VIAFLEX (2L, DAILY) AND PHYSIONEAL, UNSPECIFIED PRODUCT 1.36% (4L, DAILY) AND 2.27% (2L, DAILY) , INTRAPERITONEALLY (IP) FOR CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (CAPD). ON (B)(6) 2010, THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED FOR PERITONITIS, MANIFESTED BY ABDOMINAL PAIN, CLOUDY EFFLUENT AND MALAISE. ON (B)(6) 2010, THE PATIENT BEGAN TREATMENT WITH AMPICILLIN (DOSE AND FREQUENCY UNKNOWN) IP FOR PERITONITIS. AMPICILLIN WAS SUSPENDED AND THE PATIENT BEGAN TREATMENT WITH CEFAZOLINE (2G, DAILY, IP) FOR PERITONITIS. THE PHYSICIAN (PER THE NURSE) BELIEVED THAT THIS EVENT OF PERITONITIS WAS A RECURRENCE OF THE PREVIOUS EPISODE. ON AN UNREPORTED DATE IN DEC2010, THE PATIENT RECOVERED FROM THE EVENT OF PERITONITIS AND WAS DISCHARGED FROM THE HOSPITAL. AT THE TIME OF REPORTING, CEFAZOLINE REMAINED ONGOING. EXTRANEAL VIAFLEX AND PHYSIONEAL, UNSPECIFIED PRODUCT THERAPIES CONTINUED AT THE SAME DOSE. IT WAS NOT REPORTED IF THE EVENT OF MALAISE RESOLVED. THE NURSE STATED THAT THE PHYSICIAN THOUGHT THIS EPISODE OF PERITONITIS WAS A RECURRENCE AND THAT LABORATORY RESULTS OF THE PREVIOUS EPISODE OF PERITONITIS MAY HAVE BEEN MISTAKEN BECAUSE THE MICROORGANISMS WERE SIMILAR. THE NURSE BELIEVED THAT THE EVENT OF PERITONITIS WAS NOT RELATED TO EXTRANEAL VIAFLEX. THE NURSE DID NOT MENTION PHYSIONEAL, UNSPECIFIED PRODUCT IN THE CAUSALITY ASSESSMENT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RENAL - DISPOSABLE | SET, ADMINISTRATION, FOR PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, DISPOSABLE | KDJ |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 71 YR | Hospitalization| R | UNSPECIFIED PRODUCT 2.27% (2L, DAILY)| UNSPECIFIED PRODUCT 1.36% (4L, DAILY)| EXTRANEAL VIAFLEX (2L, DAILY), PHYSIONEAL |