DYNANAIL, 10 X 220MM
Report
- Report Number
- 3007593722-2024-00005
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 2, 2024
- Date of Event
- April 9, 2024
- Report Date
- June 4, 2024
- Manufacturer
- MEDSHAPE, INC.
- Product Code
- HSB
- UDI-DI
- M97012000110220
- PMA / PMN Number
- D155711
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- ID, US
- Reporter Occupation
- 003
Narratives
ON 4/9 DR REMOVED THE ABOVE NAIL DUE TO THE PATIENT HAVE SEVERE PAIN IN HIS TIBIA ABOVE THE NAIL. THERE WAS NO STRESS FRACTURE OR ANY DEFECT IN THE BONE VISIBLE VIA XRAY SO DR FLINT DID NOT KNOW WHAT WAS CAUSING THE PAIN. DR WAS NOT CONCERNED WITH THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OUR NAIL AS THE TTC JOINTS HAD HEALED PERFECTLY. THIS NAIL WAS PUT IN APPROXIMATELY 12 MONTHS AGO. DR DECIDED TO SPAN THE ENTIRE TIBIA WITH A SUPRA PATELLAR TIBIAL NAIL FROM STRYKER AFTER REMOVING OURS. IMPLANTS WERE NOT ABLE TO BE OBTAINED AS HOSPITAL POLICY IS TO DISCARD. A SUPPLEMENTAL MDR REPORT WILL BE FILED FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4) WHEN ALL NECESSARY INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND THE COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
SEE A2 AND H11 IN CONCLUSION, NO ROOT CAUSE COULD BE DETERMINED AS TO WHY THE PATIENT HAD REPORTED PAIN ABOVE THE TIBIA DESPITE THE 10X220MM DYNANAIL DEVICE FULLY FUSING THE TTC JOINT AND NOT HAVING ANY BREAKAGE OR VISUAL DEFECTS. DEVICE HISTORY RECORD REVIEW SHOWS THAT THE ASSOCIATED FINISHED GOOD AND RAW MATERIALS USED WERE 100% CONFORMING TO SPECIFICATION AND DUE TO LACK OF THE ORIGINALLY IMPLANTED NAIL (DISCARDED BY FACILITY) FURTHER TESTING / EVALUATION CANNOT BE PERFORMED. SURGEON FEEDBACK AND OPERATIVE NOTES DO NOT SUGGEST THAT THE PAIN WAS RELATED TO PATIENT NON-COMPLIANCE TO PROTOCOLS, INJURY, OR ILLNESS, FURTHER EVIDENCED BY THE SUCCESSFUL TTC JOINT FUSION. DESPITE THIS PATIENT PAIN AND DYNANAIL REMOVAL, A NEW NAIL DEVICE AND SCREWS WERE IMPLANTED SUCCESSFULLY FROM A DIFFERENT COMPANY. WHILE NO ROOT CAUSE COULD BE IDENTIFIED, COMPLAINT HISTORY REVIEW DOES NOT SUGGEST A RECURRENCE FOR THIS FAILURE MODE. FOR THE ABOVE REASONS, NO FURTHER ACTIONS OR CAPA ARE NECESSARY IN RESPONSE TO THIS COMPLAINT. FUTURE SIMILAR REPORTS SHALL BE MONITORED AND ASSESSED PER 7000.010 GLOBAL COMPLAINT HANDLING PROCESS.
ON 4/9 DR REMOVED THE ABOVE NAIL DUE TO THE PATIENT HAVE SEVERE PAIN IN HIS TIBIA ABOVE THE NAIL. THERE WAS NO STRESS FRACTURE OR ANY DEFECT IN THE BONE VISIBLE VIA XRAY SO DR FLINT DID NOT KNOW WHAT WAS CAUSING THE PAIN. DR WAS NOT CONCERNED WITH THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OUR NAIL AS THE TTC JOINTS HAD HEALED PERFECTLY. THIS NAIL WAS PUT IN APPROXIMATELY 12 MONTHS AGO. DR DECIDED TO SPAN THE ENTIRE TIBIA WITH A SUPRA PATELLAR TIBIAL NAIL FROM STRYKER AFTER REMOVING OURS. IMPLANTS WERE NOT ABLE TO BE OBTAINED AS HOSPITAL POLICY IS TO DISCARD.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1306063 | DYNANAIL, 10 X 220MM | ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES | HSB | MEDSHAPE, INC. | D0086 | M97012000110220 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47 YR | Male | Required Intervention| O |