PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2953144-2010-03211
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- December 13, 2010
- Date of Event
- November 18, 2010
- Report Date
- November 18, 2010
- Manufacturer
- AV-REDWOOD CITY
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- JA
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). EVALUATION SUMMARY: EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE INDICATED THAT THE PLUNGER HAD BEEN DEPRESSED TO DEPLOY THE NEEDLES AND THE POSTERIOR CUFF CAPTURED ITS NEEDLE TIP. THIS CONTRADICTED THE REPORTED INFORMATION THAT THE DEVICE WAS FORCIBLY REMOVED PRIOR TO DEPLOYING THE NEEDLES. THE RETURNED CONDITION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVICE BEING FORCIBLY PULLED OUT OF THE PATIENTS ANATOMY AFTER DEPLOYING THE NEEDLES WITHOUT RETRACTING THE NEEDLE PLUNGER AND CLOSING THE FOOT. INSPECTION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE REVEALED A BROKEN POSTERIOR FOOT WHICH WAS NOT RETURNED. ALSO, THE POSTERIOR CUFF SUCCESSFULLY CAPTURED THE POSTERIOR NEEDLE DURING NEEDLE DEPLOYMENT, BUT THE POSTERIOR NEEDLE BROKE INTO 2 PIECES AND BOTH WERE RETURNED WITH THE DEVICE. THE OBSERVED DAMAGE IS CONSISTENT WITH AN INCOMPLETE BLOW-THROUGH CAUSED BY THE PLUNGER NOT BEING FULLY DEPRESSED TO EJECT THE POSTERIOR CUFF OUT OF THE POCKET. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE POSTERIOR CUFF PARTIALLY REMAINED IN THE POSTERIOR FOOT POCKET AFTER CAPTURING ITS NEEDLE, FORCEFUL PULLING OF THE DEVICE OUT OF THE PATIENTS ANATOMY PRIOR TO RETRACTING THE NEEDLE PLUNGER AND CLOSING THE FOOT RESULTED IN A POSTERIOR FOOT AND NEEDLE BREAK AS OBSERVED. ALSO, WHILE THE DEVICE WAS BEING PULLED OUT, THE PLUNGER WAS ALSO PARTIALLY RETRACTED FROM THE DEVICE, CAUSING THE ANTERIOR CUFF TO DETACH FROM ITS NEEDLE TIP AS INDICATED BY DAMAGED ANTERIOR CUFF TABS AND ANTERIOR NEEDLE BARB. BASED ON OUR INVESTIGATION, THE CAUSE FOR THE POSTERIOR FOOT AND NEEDLE BREAK IS INCORRECT DEPLOYMENT TECHNIQUE. NO MANUFACTURING OR QUALITY ISSUE WAS DETECTED. REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD FOR THIS LOT DID NOT PRODUCE ANY FINDINGS RELEVANT TO THIS REPORT.
(B)(4): DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. IT HAS NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED. (B)(4): USE IN CALCIFIED ARTERY AND USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PERCLOSE PROGLIDE DEVICE ATTEMPTED ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF A HEAVILY CALCIFIED RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY AFTER AN INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, AFTER FOOT DEPLOYMENT, 'STRONG FORCE' WAS USED TO PULL THE DEVICE BY THE HANDLE AGAINST THE ARTERIAL WALL FOR FOOT POSITIONING. THE DEVICE WAS PULLED OUT OF THE ANATOMY WITH A PIECE OF TISSUE STUCK TO IT. MANUAL COMPRESSION WAS APPLIED TO ACHIEVE HEMOSTASIS. THERE WAS NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA. THOUGH REQUESTED, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-REDWOOD CITY | 900136H |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82 YR | Required Intervention | HEPARIN |