PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2953144-2010-03198
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- December 10, 2010
- Date of Event
- December 2, 2010
- Report Date
- December 2, 2010
- Manufacturer
- AV-REDWOOD CITY
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- PA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THE PLUNGER, NEEDLE ASSEMBLY, THE ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR CUFFS, LINK, POSTERIOR NEEDLE TIP AND SUTURE WERE NOT RETURNED. THE POSTERIOR PORTION OF THE FOOT WAS BROKEN OFF THE FOOT ASSEMBLY AND ALSO NOT RETURNED. WITHOUT THE RETURN OF THE MISSING PARTS, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO CONFIRM THE REPORTED EVENT OF A CUFF MISS. PATIENT ANATOMICAL CONDITIONS SUCH AS OBESITY AND CALCIFICATION CAN INTERFERE WITH NEEDLE DEPLOYMENT, CAUSING THE NEEDLE TO DEFLECT AND STRIKE THE FOOT, BREAKING IT. ADDITIONALLY, CALCIFICATION OR OTHER BODY MATERIAL TRAPPED UNDER THE FOOT DURING DEPLOYMENT CAN INTERFERE AND MAY BREAK THE FOOT. OPERATIONALLY, A FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A STABLE POSITION OF THE DEVICE WITH RESPECT TO THE TISSUE TRACT DURING DEPLOYMENT CAN PUT PRESSURE ON THE FOOT CAUSING IT TO BREAK. BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION FINDINGS, A POSSIBLE ROOT CAUSE FOR THE DEVICES DAMAGED CONDITION IS RELATED TO THE OPERATIONAL CONTEXT IN WHICH THE DEVICE WAS USED. NO MANUFACTURING OR QUALITY ISSUE WAS DETECTED. REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD FOR THIS LOT DID NOT PRODUCE ANY FINDINGS RELEVANT TO THIS REPORT.
(B)(4). DEVICE #2: PART #12673-03, LOT #930296H IS BEING FILED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDWATCH MFR NUMBER.THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. IT HAS NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED.(B)(4).
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE ATTEMPTED ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF THE RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY AFTER AN INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, WHEN THE PLUNGER WAS PULLED BACK NO SUTURE WAS ATTACHED, A CUFF MISS OCCURRED. A SECOND PROGLIDE DEVICE WAS USED WITH THE SAME RESULTS. A NON-ABBOTT DEVICE WAS USED TO ACHIEVE HEMOSTASIS. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS REPORTED. THOUGH REQUESTED, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-REDWOOD CITY | 930296H |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61 YR | Required Intervention | PROGLIDE, PART #12673-03, LOT #930296HHEPARIN |