PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2953144-2010-03059
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- December 2, 2010
- Date of Event
- November 2, 2010
- Report Date
- November 10, 2010
- Manufacturer
- AV-REDWOOD CITY
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- IL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). THE DEVICE WAS RECEIVED. INVESTIGATION IS NOT YET COMPLETE. (B)(4). DEVICES #1 AND #3 - PROGLIDE (PART #12673-03; LOT #930076H) ARE BEING FILED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDWATCH MFR NUMBER.
(B)(4). EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THE PLUNGER, LINK, NEEDLES, AND CUFFS WERE NOT RETURNED. WITHOUT THE RETURN OF THESE COMPONENTS, THE SCOPE OF THIS INVESTIGATION WAS LIMITED. INSPECTION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE REVEALED A NEEDLE STRIKE MARK AT THE POSTERIOR FOOT. THIS IS INDICATIVE OF THE POSTERIOR NEEDLE STRIKING THE FOOT INSTEAD OF ENGAGING WITH THE POSTERIOR CUFF INSIDE THE POSTERIOR FOOT POCKET AS DESIGNED. DURING TESTING, A PROXY PLUNGER WAS INSERTED TO TEST THE NEEDLE TRAJECTORY AND PUSH MANDREL TRAVEL LENGTH AND THE RESULTS WERE ACCEPTABLE. BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION FINDINGS, THE PROBABLE ROOT CAUSE FOR THE POSTERIOR NEEDLE STRIKING THE FOOT INSTEAD OF ENGAGING WITH THE POSTERIOR CUFF DURING NEEDLE DEPLOYMENT IS NEEDLE DEFLECTION DUE TO INTERACTION WITH HUMAN TISSUE OR A FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A STABLE POSITION OF THE DEVICE WITH RESPECT TO THE TISSUE TRACT. NO MANUFACTURING OR QUALITY ISSUE WAS DETECTED. REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD FOR THIS LOT DID NOT PRODUCE ANY FINDINGS RELEVANT TO THIS REPORT.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE ATTEMPTED ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF THE COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY AFTER AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, AN UNSPECIFIED DEVICE FAILURE OCCURRED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND TWO ADDITIONAL PROGLIDE DEVICES WERE USED WITH THE SAME RESULTS. THE METHOD OF HOW HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED WAS NOT REPORTED. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS. THOUGH REQUESTED, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
IT WAS ORIGINALLY REPORTED THAT THE PT HAD ONLY ONE PROGRAM TO WORK WITH BUT THAT THE NEUROSTIMULATOR GAVE HER GOOD RESULTS. SHE WAS GIVEN 4 NEW PROGRAMS EVEN THOUGH THE DEVICE WAS HELPING WITH HER SYMPTOMS. SUBSEQUENT INFO RECEIVED INDICATED THAT THE PT EXPERIENCED A SHOCKING SENSATION AND HAD PROBLEMS WITH HER DEVICE SYSTEM. ADD'L INFO WAS REQUESTED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-REDWOOD CITY | 930076H |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention | DEVICE #1:PROGLIDE (PART#12673-03,LOT #930076H) |