PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2953144-2010-03043
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- November 30, 2010
- Date of Event
- November 11, 2010
- Report Date
- November 12, 2010
- Manufacturer
- AV-REDWOOD CITY
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- TX, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). THE DEVICE WAS RECEIVED. INVESTIGATION IS NOT YET COMPLETE. ESTIMATED DATE (DATE OF EVENT REPORTED AS EITHER (B)(6) 2010 OR (B)(6) 2010). (B)(4). DEVICE #2 - PROGLIDE (PART #12673-03; LOT #930396H) IS BEING FILED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDWATCH MFR NUMBER.
(B)(4). EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THE PLUNGER, LINK, ANTERIOR NEEDLE, AND BOTH CUFFS WERE NOT RETURNED. WITHOUT THE RETURN OF ALL COMPONENTS, THE INVESTIGATION WAS LIMITED. INSPECTION REVEALED AN UNDISTURBED POSTERIOR NEEDLE AND AN UNRAVELED SUTURE KNOT. THIS IS INDICATIVE OF THE POSTERIOR NEEDLE BEING DEFLECTED AWAY FROM THE POSTERIOR FOOT INSTEAD OF ENGAGED WITH THE POSTERIOR CUFF INSIDE THE POSTERIOR FOOT POCKET DURING NEEDLE DEPLOYMENT. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE SUTURE KNOT WOULD NOT FORM TO BE ADVANCED TO THE ARTERIAL SURFACE TO CLOSE THE VESSEL. DURING TESTING, A PROXY PLUNGER WAS INSERTED TO TEST THE NEEDLE TRAJECTORY AND PUSH MANDREL TRAVEL LENGTH AND THE RESULTS WERE ACCEPTABLE. BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION FINDINGS, THE PROBABLE ROOT CAUSE FOR THE POSTERIOR CUFF MISS IS NEEDLE DEFLECTION DUE TO INTERACTION WITH HUMAN TISSUE OR A FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A STABLE POSITION OF THE DEVICE WITH RESPECT TO THE TISSUE TRACT. NO MANUFACTURING OR QUALITY ISSUES WERE DETECTED. REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD FOR THIS LOT DID NOT PRODUCE ANY FINDINGS RELEVANT TO THIS REPORT.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE ATTEMPTED ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF THE RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY AFTER A DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, THE SUTURE WAS DEPLOYED, HOWEVER, NO HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED. THE PROGLIDE DEVICE WAS REMOVED UNEVENTFULLY AND A SECOND PROGLIDE DEVICE WAS USED. THE PHYSICIAN COMMENTED THAT "THE PROGLIDE DEVICE WAS POSSIBLY INSERTED 'TOO FAR' IN TO THE ARTERY" BECAUSE WHEN THE DEVICE WAS BEING RETRACTED FOR PROPER POSITION THE "BACK WALL WAS PINCHED TO THE FRONT WALL". THE FOOT WAS PARKED AND THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED; HOWEVER, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A "COLD FOOT" (DIMINISHED PULSE). THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO SURGERY AND A CUT DOWN PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AND HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED SURGICALLY. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE DOING FINE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELAE. THOUGH REQUESTED, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-REDWOOD CITY | 930396H |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49 YR | Required Intervention | DEVICE #2: PROGLIDE (PART #12673-03, LOT #930396H) |