PROSTAR XL SUTURE-MEDIATED CLOSURE
Report
- Report Number
- 2953144-2010-02944
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- November 22, 2010
- Date of Event
- October 26, 2010
- Report Date
- October 28, 2010
- Manufacturer
- AV-REDWOOD CITY
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- GM
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. IT HAS NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED.(B)(4):DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION.
(B)(4). EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THE SHEATH APPEARED NORMAL. NO KINK WAS FOUND ON THE SHEATH. DURING THE INVESTIGATION, THE GUIDEWIRE WAS BACKLOADED AND FRONTLOADED WITHOUT A PROBLEM. BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION FINDINGS, THE DEVICE PERFORMED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATION; THEREFORE, THE ROOT CAUSE FOR REPORTED EVENT COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. NO MANUFACTURING OR QUALITY ISSUES WERE DETECTED. REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD FOR THIS LOT DID NOT PRODUCE ANY FINDINGS RELEVANT TO THIS REPORT.
WE ARE REPORTING 3 OF THE SAME DEVICE.FIRST DISPOSABLE FAILED AND AFTER REMOVING FROM PATIENT NOTED THE BALLOON APPEARED TO BE FUSED IN ONE AREA. 2ND AND 3RD DISPOSABLE WERE USED AND EACH TIME THE THERMACHOICE MACHINE FAILED AFTER THIRD ONE FAILED IMMEDIATELY. CALLED THE COMPANY REP AND SHE CAME IN TO EVAL THE SITUATION. NO RESOLVE OF PROBLEM AFTER SHE SPOKE TO MFG TECHNICAL SUPPORT. SEVERAL OF OUR DISPOSABLE CORDS WERE USED DURING TROUBLE SHOOTING. IN THE CLEANUP PROCESS, THE DEVICES WERE NOT KEPT ISOLATED IN THE CORRECT PACKAGES SO ID BY STAFF WAS NOT POSSIBLE. THE MFG REP DID GIVE THE FIRST DEVICE # TO HER COMPANY BUT WE HAVE NO ACCESS TO THAT INFORMATION AT PRESENT.====================== HEALTH PROFESSIONAL'S IMPRESSION======================STAFF DOESN'T KNOW EXCEPT FOR FIRST DEVICE WHERE THE BALLOON WAS "FUSED."
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROSTAR XL DEVICE ACHIEVED ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF THE COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY AFTER AN INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, THERE WAS DIFFICULTY ADVANCING A NON-ABBOTT GUIDE WIRE THROUGH THE GUIDE WIRE PORT PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF THE PROSTAR XL DEVICE FROM THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY. THE GUIDE WIRE WOULD NOT ADVANCE PAST "THE AREA OF THE HEMOSTASIS VALVE, DISTAL OF THE GUIDE WIRE EXIT PORT OF THE PROSTAR XL DEVICE". THE GUIDE WIRE WAS RETRACTED AND RE-INSERTED. WITH "MORE EFFORT AND SLIGHT PUSHING", THE GUIDE WIRE WAS SUCCESSFULLY ADVANCED. THE PHYSICIAN COMMENTED "THIS IS NOT REALLY PROPER HANDLING" TO HIM. HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED WITH THE PROSTAR XL DEVICE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PROSTAR XL SUTURE-MEDIATED CLOSURE | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-REDWOOD CITY | 900356H |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |