RENAL - DISPOSABLE
Report
- Report Number
- 1423500-2010-05588
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- November 11, 2010
- Date of Event
- October 1, 2010
- Report Date
- October 21, 2010
- Product Code
- KDJ
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- IN
- Reporter Occupation
- NURSE
Narratives
(B)(4). THE DEVICES INVOLVED IN THE INCIDENT WERE UNKNOWN. AS THE DATE OF ONSET OF THIS PERITONITIS EPISODE IS UNKNOWN AND PATIENTS DISCARD SUPPLIES AFTER EACH THERAPY, THE SAMPLE WAS NOT REQUESTED. A 510K NUMBER WILL NOT BE PROVIDED IN THE MDR AS THE PRODUCT CODE AND LOT NUMBER ARE UNKNOWN. SINCE THE LOT NUMBER IS UNKNOWN, NO BATCH REVIEW WILL BE PERFORMED. BAXTER HAS RECEIVED SIMILAR REPORTS FOR THE REPORTED PROBLEM. BAXTER WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR SIMILAR REPORTS TO DETERMINE IF FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED.
ON (B)(6) 2010, THE PATIENT STARTED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (PD) TREATMENT. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, A BREAK IN ASEPTIC TECHNIQUE OCCURRED, DESCRIBED AS THE "PATIENT MADE A MISTAKE." ON (B)(6) 2010, THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH PERITONITIS. ON (B)(6) 2010, THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED FOR THE PERITONITIS. THE RESULTS OF THE CULTURE WERE UNKNOWN. ON (B)(6) 2010, THE PATIENT BEGAN REMEDIAL THERAPY WITH FORTUM (1GM, DAILY, INTRAPERITONEALLY (IP) AND AMIKACIN (125MG, LOADING DOSE, IP). PD THERAPY WAS ONGOING. IT WAS NOT REPORTED WHETHER THE PATIENT WAS RETRAINED; THEREFORE THE OUTCOME FOR THE EVENT OF BREAK IN ASEPTIC TECHNIQUE WAS UNKNOWN. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THE PERITONITIS WAS RESOLVING. THE REPORTER BELIEVED THAT THE PERITONITIS WAS DUE TO THE BREAK IN ASEPTIC TECHNIQUE. A CAUSALITY STATEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED FOR THE BREAK IN ASEPTIC TECHNIQUE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RENAL - DISPOSABLE | SET, ADMINISTRATION, FOR PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, DISPOSABLE | KDJ |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 69 YR | Hospitalization| R | DIANEAL PD2 ULTRABAG |