ERBE VIO 200 S
Report
- Report Number
- 9610614-2010-00021
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- November 2, 2010
- Date of Event
- October 5, 2010
- Report Date
- November 2, 2010
- Manufacturer
- ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
- Product Code
- GEI
- PMA / PMN Number
- K080715
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- NH, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
THE ESU HAS BEEN PUT BACK INTO SERVICE; THEREFORE, THE UNIT WAS NOT RETURNED TO ERBE FOR AN EVALUATION. IN ADDITION, NO ANOMALIES WERE FOUND IN THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD (DHR) OF THE INVOLVED DEVICE. IN CONCLUSION, NO EQUIPMENT PROBLEM OCCURRED THAT WOULD HAVE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. MOST LIKELY THERE WERE MANY FACTORS INVOLVED IN THE REPORTED EVENT. HOWEVER, IT APPEARS THAT UPON THE INTERVENTION WORK TO REMOVE THE POLYP, THE REMAINING TISSUE OF THE BOWEL WALL DID NOT STAY INTACT WHICH RESULTED IN THE PERFORATION (I.E., THE POLYP WAS IN A VERY THIN WALLED AREA AND THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH WALL REMAINING TO STAY INTACT). NONETHELESS, NO CONCLUSIVE DETERMINATION COULD BE MADE AS TO THE CAUSE OF THE INCIDENT. NO TRENDS WERE IDENTIFIED WITH THE REPORTED SITUATION AND THE ACCOUNT DOESN'T NEED ANY ADDITIONAL INSERVICING. ERBE USA, INC. IS NOW CLOSING THE FILE ON THIS EVENT.
THE ACCOUNT REPORTED THAT THE ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT (ESU/GENERATOR) WAS INVOLVED IN A PATIENT INCIDENT. THE ESU WAS USED TO REMOVE A CECAL POLYP. THE SETTINGS FOR THE GENERATOR WERE FORCED COAG MODE, EFFECT 1, 25 WATTS. THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF ABDOMINAL PAIN FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL THE NEXT DAY AND SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED TO ADDRESS A PERFORATION.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ERBE VIO 200 S | ELECTROSURGICAL GENERATOR | GEI | ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH | VIO 200 S | NA |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NI | Hospitalization| R |