ECLIPSE
Report
- Report Number
- 3003793371-2010-00026
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- October 13, 2010
- Date of Event
- April 26, 2010
- Report Date
- April 26, 2010
- Manufacturer
- VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS
- Product Code
- MUJ
- PMA / PMN Number
- K073020
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
CUSTOMER BEAM DATA (6X) AND PLANS WERE USED FOR THE INVESTIGATION. ECLIPSE VERSION 8.6.15 FOR BOTH CLIENT AND AAA WAS USED. THE BEAM DATA PROFILES WERE ALSO COMPARED TO GB DATA. THE SECOND SOURCE INTENSITY VALUE, WHICH SEEMED TO BE QUITE HIGH WAS STUDIED AND COMPARED TO THE DATA SETS AVAILABLE WITH AAA RESEARCH TEAM. PLANS WERE RECALCULATED AFTER SPLIT AND DOSE FOR DIFFERENT STRUCTURES WERE COMPARED TO THE ORIGINAL NON SPLIT PLAN. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMS DEVICE MALFUNCTION DUE TO SOFTWARE DESIGN LIMITATION THAT RESULT IN DOSIMETRIC/CALCULATION ERRORS IN TREATMENT PLANNING. SPLIT FIELD IMRT PLANS CAN DELIVER HIGHER THAN INTENDED DOSES, COMPARED TO THE APPROVED TREATMENT PLANS BEFORE THE MULTI-CARRIAGE SPLIT. LARGE IMRT FIELDS THAT MUST BE DIVIDED INTO SMALLER FIELDS FOR DELIVERY HAVE BEEN FOUND TO DELIVER HIGHER DOSES THAN PLANNED, WHEN THE DIVIDED FIELDS ARE RECALCULATED. INVESTIGATION HAS FOUND THAT THE HIGHER THAN INTENDED DOSES ARE MORE PRONOUNCED WITH A 90 DEGREE COLLIMATOR POSITION WITH THE MLC LEAVES IN THE SUPERIOR-INFERIOR DIRECTION. DOSE DIFFERENCES, GREATER THAN 10%, WERE FOUND AFTER RE-CALCULATION OF THESE SPLIT FIELD IMRT PLANS. WITHOUT PRE-TREATMENT PLAN QA, THE DOSE DIFFERENCE COULD GO UNDETECTED FOR AN ENTIRE COURSE OF TREATMENT. HIGHER THAN INTENDED TOTAL DOSE TO TARGETS AND CRITICAL STRUCTURES COULD LEAD TO INCREASED TOXICITY AND SERIOUS INJURY REQUIRING MEDICAL INTERVENTION. IN THIS CASE THERE WAS NO SERIOUS INJURY REPORTED. A PRODUCT NOTIFICATION LETTER WILL BE SENT TO AFFECTED CUSTOMERS. ALL CORRECTIVE ACTION WILL BE REPORTED UNDER THE GUIDELINES OF 21 CFR PART 806. NO FOLLOW-UP REPORTS ARE ANTICIPATED.
THE FOLLOWING INFO WAS REPORTED TO VARIAN: CUSTOMER STATES THAT THE PRESENCE OF OPTIMAL FLUENCE EFFECTS THE CALCULATION OF THE FIELD DOSE. CUSTOMER HAD A PLAN WITH OPTIMAL FLUENCE THAT WAS CONVERTED TO ACTUAL FLUENCE, THEN TO MLC PATTERN AND THEN CALCULATED. THE CUSTOMER THEN COPIED THE PLAN, EXPORTED THE MLC, DELETED THE OPTIMAL FLUENCE / MLC AND RE-IMPORTED THE MLC FILE AND CALCULATED. THESE TWO PLANS SHOULD BE IDENTICAL BUT INSTEAD WHEN DOING A DOSE SUBTRACTION, THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN FIELD FLUENCE IN THE SUPERIOR Y JAW. NO PT INJURY REPORTED AND NO PT DATA PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ECLIPSE | TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM | MUJ | VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS | H48 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |