PROLENE POLYPROPYLENE MESH UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Report
- Report Number
- 2210968-2024-02091
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- February 28, 2024
- Date of Event
- November 29, 2022
- Report Date
- February 28, 2024
- Manufacturer
- ETHICON INC.
- Product Code
- FTL
- PMA / PMN Number
- K962530
- Removal / Correction Number
- N/A
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- TU
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
PRODUCT COMPLAINT#: (B)(4). THIS REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF 21 CFR, PART 803. THIS REPORT MAY BE BASED ON INFORMATION WHICH HAS NOT BEEN INVESTIGATED OR VERIFIED PRIOR TO THE REQUIRED REPORTING DATE. THIS REPORT DOES NOT REFLECT A CONCLUSION BY ETHICON INC, OR ITS EMPLOYEES THAT THE REPORT CONSTITUTES AN ADMISSION THAT THE PRODUCT, ETHICON INC, OR ITS EMPLOYEES CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE POTENTIAL EVENT DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT. IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL REPORT, A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE. ATTEMPTS ARE BEING MADE TO OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. TO DATE NO RESPONSE HAS BEEN PROVIDED. IF FURTHER DETAILS ARE RECEIVED AT A LATER DATE A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE SENT. DOES THE SURGEON BELIEVE THAT ANY OF THE ETHICON PRODUCTS INVOLVED CAUSED AND/OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ARTICLE? WHICH SPECIFIC ETHICON PRODUCTS HAVE BEEN USED DURING THE PROCEDURES (PRODUCT CODE, LOT NUMBER)? DOES THE SURGEON BELIEVE THERE WAS ANY DEFICIENCY WITH ANY OF THE ETHICON PRODUCTS USED IN THIS PROCEDURE? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. WERE THE CASES DISCUSSED IN THIS ARTICLE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO ETHICON? IF YES, PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLAINT REFERENCE NUMBER. PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS? THIS REPORT IS RELATED TO A JOURNAL ARTICLE; THEREFORE, NO PRODUCT WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE BATCH HISTORY RECORDS CANNOT BE REVIEWED AS THE LOT NUMBER HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. H6 COMPONENT CODE: G07002 ¿ DEVICE NOT RETURNED. THE SINGLE COMPLAINT WAS REPORTED WITH MULTIPLE EVENTS. THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS REGARDING THE ADDITIONAL EVENTS. CITATION: COMPARISON OF SURGICAL TREATMENT RESULTS OF LARGE INCISIONAL HERNIAS. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.7759/CUREUS.32020.
TITLE: COMPARISON OF SURGICAL TREATMENT RESULTS OF LARGE INCISIONAL HERNIAS. THE AIM OF THIS STUDY IS TO COMPARE THE RESULTS OF THE THREE MOST COMMON SURGICAL TREATMENT METHODS USED IN A TERTIARY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOR THE REPAIR OF LARGE INCISIONAL HERNIAS IN TERMS OF PATIENTS' CHARACTERISTICS, RECURRENCE, AND COMPLICATION RATES OF THE TREATMENT METHODS. BETWEEN 2014 AND 2020, 366 PATIENTS WITH INCISIONAL HERNIAS WITH FACIAL DEFECTS LARGER THAN 10 CM IN A TERTIARY MEDICAL FACULTY HOSPITAL LOCATED IN EASTERN TURKEY WERE ANALYZED. PATIENTS WERE DIVIDED INTO THREE GROUPS ACCORDING TO THE SURGICAL METHOD USED: OPEN ONLAY PROLENE MESH (OPM) METHOD, LAPAROSCOPIC INTRAPERITONEAL SUBLAY DUAL MESH (IPSDM) METHOD, AND OPEN IPSDM METHOD. PROPYLENE MESH WAS USED IN THE OPEN OPM TECHNIQUE AND DUAL-COMPOSITE MESH WAS USED IN THE LAPAROSCOPIC IPSDM AND OPEN IPSDM TECHNIQUES. REPORTED COMPLICATION: SEROMA (N-42). BLEEDING (N-5). SUPERFICIAL WOUND INFECTION (N-25). SKIN EROSION (N-10). SKIN NECROSIS (N-2). MESH REACTION (N-3). ENTEROCUTANEOUS FISTULA (N- 1). RECURRENCE (N-28). CONCLUSIONS ALTHOUGH HERNIA DEFECT IS GREATER IN THE OPEN IPSDM COMPARED TO OTHER METHODS, THIS METHOD IS MORE ADVANTAGEOUS IN TERMS OF THE COMPLICATION RATE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE, THE OVERALL COMPLICATION RATE, THE DURATION OF SURGERY, AND THE RECURRENCE RATE. LAPAROSCOPIC IPSDM IS A MORE ADVANTAGEOUS METHOD IN TERMS OF THE OVERALL WOUND AND MEDICAL COMPLICATIONS.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 445187 | PROLENE POLYPROPYLENE MESH UNKNOWN PRODUCT | MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC | FTL | ETHICON INC. |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Unknown | Required Intervention |