FDA Adverse Event Malfunction Summary report: N

ULTRAFLEX ESOPHAGEAL STENT SYSTEM, ULTRAFLEX DIAMONDBILIARY STENT SYSTEM, ULTRAF

MDR report key: 1854581 · Received October 5, 2010

Report

Report Number
3005099803-2010-04235
Event Type
Malfunction
Date Received
October 5, 2010
Date of Event
September 14, 2010
Report Date
September 15, 2010
Manufacturer
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Product Code
JCT
PMA / PMN Number
K012883
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
TW
Reporter Occupation
PHYSICIAN

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

(B)(4): THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE MANUFACTURER; HOWEVER, A FAILURE ANALYSIS HAS NOT YET BEEN COMPLETED. UPON RECEIPT OF THE FAILURE ANALYSIS, IF THERE IS ANY FURTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION FROM THAT REVIEW, A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

AN INITIAL VISUAL EXAMINATION NOTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED PARTIALLY DEPLOYED. THE DEPLOYMENT SUTURE WAS NOT BROKEN; RATHER, APPROXIMATELY 84MM OF IT HAD BEEN RELEASED. NO VISIBLE DAMAGE WAS NOTED TO THE CATHETER DELIVERY SYSTEM. THE REMAINDER OF THE DEPLOYMENT SUTURE WAS RETRACTED WITHOUT ISSUE, AND THE STENT DEPLOYED AS INTENDED. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WITH THE STENT¿S PROFILE. THE CONDITION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE WAS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPLAINT EVENT- THE DEPLOYMENT SUTURE WAS INTACT. THE STENT, HOWEVER, WAS RETURNED PARTIALLY DEPLOYED. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD (DHR) WAS PERFORMED; NO ANOMALIES WERE NOTED. A SEARCH OF THE COMPLAINT DATABASE REVEALED THAT NO SIMILAR COMPLAINTS EXIST FOR THE SPECIFIED LOT. A LABELING REVIEW WAS PERFORMED AND NO DEVIATION WAS FOUND.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL COVERED STENT WAS USED DURING A STENTING PROCEDURE WITHIN THE LUNGS ON (B)(6), 2010. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DEPLOYMENT SUTURE BROKE WHEN THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO DEPLOY THE STENT. THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THAT THERE WAS RESISTANCE WHEN AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO PULL ON THE STRING, AND THE STENT DID NOT DEPLOY. ADDITIONALLY, THE ANATOMY WAS TORTUOUS, AND THE STRICTURE WAS NOT PREDILATED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER ULTRAFLEX STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL COVERED STENT WAS USED DURING A STENTING PROCEDURE WITHIN THE LUNGS ON (B)(6), 2010. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DEPLOYMENT SUTURE BROKE WHEN THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO DEPLOY THE STENT. THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THAT THERE WAS RESISTANCE WHEN AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO PULL ON THE STRING, AND THE STENT DID NOT DEPLOY. ADDITIONALLY, THE ANATOMY WAS TORTUOUS, AND THE STRICTURE WAS NOT PREDILATED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER ULTRAFLEX STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
1 ULTRAFLEX ESOPHAGEAL STENT SYSTEM, ULTRAFLEX DIAMONDBILIARY STENT SYSTEM, ULTRAF PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE JCT BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY M00569060 0013185668

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 69 YR