COBAS PHENYTOIN/200
Report
- Report Number
- 1823260-2010-05314
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- September 8, 2010
- Date of Event
- August 19, 2010
- Report Date
- September 8, 2010
- Manufacturer
- ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
- Product Code
- MOJ
- PMA / PMN Number
- K951595
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- IL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE INITIAL REPORTER SENT A REPORT TO THE FDA.
THE CUSTOMER RECEIVED DISCREPANT PHENYTOIN CRITICAL RESULTS FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE TESTED ON A COBAS C501 MODULE (B)(4). THE INITIAL PHENYTOIN RESULT WAS 36.3 UG/ML (ACCOMPANIED BY DATA FLAGS). THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED SEVEN TIMES: THE FIRST REPEAT RESULT WAS 37.0 UG/ML (ACCOMPANIED BY DATA FLAGS). THIS RESULT WAS CALLED TO THE PHYSICIAN AS A CRITICAL VALUE. THE SECOND REPEAT RESULT, TESTED ON A COBAS INTEGRA 400 ANALYZER, GAVE 27.5 UG/ML (ACCOMPANIED BY A DATA FLAG). THE THIRD REPEAT RESULT, TESTED 08/21/2010 ON A COBAS INTEGRA 400 ANALYZER, GAVE 26.7 UG/ML (ACCOMPANIED BY A DATA FLAG). THE FOURTH REPEAT RESULT, TESTED (B)(6)2010 ON A COBAS INTEGRA 400 ANALYZER, GAVE 25.7 UG/ML (ACCOMPANIED BY A DATA FLAG). THE FIFTH REPEAT RESULT, TESTED (B)(6)2010 ON A COBAS INTEGRA 400 ANALYZER, GAVE 27.3 UG/ML (ACCOMPANIED BY A DATA FLAG). THE SIXTH REPEAT RESULT, TESTED ON (B)(6)2010 ON ORIGINAL ANALYZER, GAVE 24.9 UG/ML (ACCOMPANIED BY A DATA FLAG). THE SEVENTH REPEAT RESULT, TESTED (B)(6)2010 ON ORIGINAL ANALYZER, GAVE 25.6 UG/ML (ACCOMPANIED BY A DATA FLAG). THIS RESULT WAS CALLED TO THE PHYSICIAN AS A CORRECTED REPORT. THE CUSTOMER CONSIDERED THE 36.3 UG/ML AND THE 37.0 UG/ML TO BE ERRONEOUS RESULTS. THE PHYSICIAN DETERMINED THE TWO PHENYTOIN RESULTS REPORTED TO HIM (37.0 UG/ML AND 25.6 UG/ML) WOULD BE IN THE SAME RANGE FOR DOSING AND THAT NO CHANGE OF MEDICATION WAS INITIATED BASED ON THE 37.0 UG/ML RESULT. THE PATIENT WAS NOT AFFECTED. THE FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE DETERMINED THE PHENYTOIN NEEDED TO BE RE-CALIBRATED. HE VERIFIED THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH THE HARDWARE BY PERFORMING MECHANICAL CHECKS. THE FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE ALSO RAN A PRECISION STUDY WHICH WAS WITHIN SPECIFICATION. THE CUSTOMER RE-CALIBRATED THE PHENYTOIN AND RAN QUALITY CONTROL WHICH WAS ACCEPTABLE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | COBAS PHENYTOIN/200 | COMPETITIVE BINDING, PHENYTOIN | MOJ | ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS | NA | 14827800 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 063 YR | PHENYTOIN |