FDA Adverse Event Malfunction Summary report: N

SENHANCE

MDR report key: 18240519 · Received November 30, 2023

Report

Report Number
3007593944-2023-00016
Event Type
Malfunction
Date Received
November 30, 2023
Date of Event
October 11, 2023
Report Date
October 30, 2024
Manufacturer
ASENSUS SURGICAL, INC.
Product Code
NAY
UDI-DI
00815440020187
PMA / PMN Number
K171120
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
GM
Reporter Occupation
PHYSICIAN
Health Professional
Yes

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

AS REPORTED BY THE COMPLAINANT, DURING A GYNECOLOGICAL PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE INSULATION FROM THE MONOPOLAR SCISSORS WAS NO LONGER INTACT. THE INSTRUMENT EMITTED SPARKING AND DELIVERED HEAT TO UNWANTED TISSUE AREAS. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED SINCE THE EVENT WAS NOTICED IN TIME AND THE PROCEDURE WAS CONVERTED TO TRADITIONAL LAPAROSCOPY DURING THE LAST SURGICAL STEPS TO AVOID ANY HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE MALFUNCTIONED MONOPOLAR SCISSORS WERE REQUESTED BY ASENSUS SURGICAL TO BE RETURNED TO CONDUCT FURTHER INVESTIGATION. A DEVICE HISTORY RECORD REVIEW HAS BEEN PERFORMED WITH NO ANOMALOUS FINDINGS. THE INSTRUMENT WAS RETRIEVED AND SHIPPED TO ASENSUS SURGICAL INC. FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS. THE R&D TEAM ANALYZED THE DEVICE AND CONFIRMED THAT THE INSULATION WAS DAMAGED. ALSO, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE OPEN/CLOSE ACTION OF THE JAWS DID NOT CAUSE ANY INSULATION MOVEMENT EXPOSING METAL PARTS. A BENCH TEST WAS SET UP WITH THE SCISSORS ON A SALINE-SOAKED SPONGE. USING BOTH INSTRUMENTS, THE SUSTAINING TEAM WAS ABLE TO RECREATE THE FAILURE MODE SEEN AT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TUBINGEN, ONLY WHEN THE INSULATION WAS TOUCHING THE SPONGE. THE RESULTS OF THE TEST CONFIRMED THE INSTRUMENT DAMAGE PROBABLY WAS DUE TO WEAR AND TEAR OF THE INSTRUMENT. ACCORDING TO THE RESULTS OF THE TESTS, THE DAMAGED PRODUCTS WILL BE DISPOSED OF. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE EMITTED SPARKING IS RELATED TO THE WEAR AND TEAR OF THE INSULATION PART OF THE INSTRUMENT. HOWEVER, ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, THE INSTRUMENT WAS VISUALLY INSPECTED BEFORE USE, BUT NOT ACCORDING TO THE INDICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. PER THE IFU (UM-001-00045), THE FOLLOWING IS NOTED REGARDING INSTRUMENT USE: "INSPECT INSTRUMENTS FOR DAMAGE BEFORE EACH USE, ESPECIALLY THE INSULATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC/ENDOSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS. THIS MAY BE DONE VISUALLY UNDER MAGNIFICATION OR WITH A HIGH VOLTAGE INSULATION TESTING DEVICE. INSULATION FAILURES MAY RESULT IN BURNS OR OTHER INJURIES TO THE PATIENT OR OPERATOR. VISUAL INSPECTION ALONE MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO ENSURE THAT THE INSULATION IS INTACT." PER THE COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLINICAL SPECIALIST, THE INSTRUMENT WAS ONLY VISUALLY INSPECTED BEFORE USE WITHOUT MAGNIFICATION OR A HIGH VOLTAGE INSULATION TESTING DEVICE.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

AS REPORTED BY THE COMPLAINANT, DURING A GYNECOLOGICAL PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE INSULATION FROM THE MONOPOLAR SCISSORS WAS NO LONGER INTACT. THE INSTRUMENT EMITTED SPARKING AND DELIVERED HEAT TO UNWANTED TISSUE AREAS. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED SINCE THE EVENT WAS NOTICED IN TIME AND THE PROCEDURE WAS CONVERTED TO TRADITIONAL LAPAROSCOPY DURING THE LAST SURGICAL STEPS TO AVOID ANY HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE MALFUNCTIONED MONOPOLAR SCISSORS WERE REQUESTED BY ASENSUS SURGICAL TO BE RETURNED TO CONDUCT FURTHER INVESTIGATION. A DEVICE HISTORY RECORD REVIEW HAS BEEN PERFORMED WITH NO ANOMALOUS FINDINGS. THE INSTRUMENT WAS RETRIEVED AND SHIPPED TO ASENSUS SURGICAL INC. FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS. THE R&D TEAM ANALYZED THE DEVICE AND CONFIRMED THAT THE INSULATION WAS DAMAGED. ALSO, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE OPEN/CLOSE ACTION OF THE JAWS DID NOT CAUSE ANY INSULATION MOVEMENT EXPOSING METAL PARTS. A BENCH TEST WAS SET UP WITH THE SCISSORS ON A SALINE-SOAKED SPONGE. USING BOTH INSTRUMENTS, THE SUSTAINING TEAM WAS ABLE TO RECREATE THE FAILURE MODE SEEN AT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TUBINGEN, ONLY WHEN THE INSULATION WAS TOUCHING THE SPONGE. THE RESULTS OF THE TEST CONFIRMED THE INSTRUMENT DAMAGE PROBABLY WAS DUE TO WEAR AND TEAR OF THE INSTRUMENT. ACCORDING TO THE RESULTS OF THE TESTS, THE DAMAGED PRODUCTS WILL BE DISPOSED OF. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE EMITTED SPARKING IS RELATED TO THE WEAR AND TEAR OF THE INSULATION PART OF THE INSTRUMENT. HOWEVER, ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, THE INSTRUMENT WAS VISUALLY INSPECTED BEFORE USE, BUT NOT ACCORDING TO THE INDICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. PER THE IFU (UM-001-00045), THE FOLLOWING IS NOTED REGARDING INSTRUMENT USE: "INSPECT INSTRUMENTS FOR DAMAGE BEFORE EACH USE, ESPECIALLY THE INSULATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC/ENDOSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS. THIS MAY BE DONE VISUALLY UNDER MAGNIFICATION OR WITH A HIGH VOLTAGE INSULATION TESTING DEVICE. INSULATION FAILURES MAY RESULT IN BURNS OR OTHER INJURIES TO THE PATIENT OR OPERATOR. VISUAL INSPECTION ALONE MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO ENSURE THAT THE INSULATION IS INTACT." PER THE COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLINICAL SPECIALIST, THE INSTRUMENT WAS ONLY VISUALLY INSPECTED BEFORE USE WITHOUT MAGNIFICATION OR A HIGH VOLTAGE INSULATION TESTING DEVICE. FOLLOWUP #1: CORRECTED CATALOG AND MODEL NUMBER FIELDS THAT WERE INADVERTENTLY ENTERED INTO THE SERIAL NUMBER FIELD. PER FDA REQUEST, INCLUDED THE FULL (UDI) FOR THIS DEVICE ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT, SINCE ASENSUS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED ONLY THE GTIN AND LOT NUMBERS.

Description of Event or Problem · 0

THE EVENT OCCURRED ON 10/11/2023 AND REPORTED TO ASENSUS ON 10/11/2023. THE EVENT DID NOT OCCUR WITHIN THE UNITED STATES. THE EVENT OCCURRED IN (B)(6) HOSPITAL . AS REPORTED BY THE COMPLAINANT, DURING A GYNECOLOGICAL PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE INSULATION FROM THE MONOPOLAR SCISSORS WAS NO LONGER INTACT. THE INSTRUMENT EMITTED SPARKING AND DELIVERED HEAT TO UNWANTED TISSUE AREAS. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED SINCE THE EVENT WAS NOTICED IN TIME AND THE PROCEDURE WAS CONVERTED TO TRADITIONAL LAPAROSCOPY DURING THE LAST SURGICAL STEPS TO AVOID ANY HARM TO THE PATIENT. *NOTE* - ADDITIONALLY, ASENSUS SUBMITTED (B)(4) WITH FILE NAME 3007593944-2023-00014 ON (B)(6) 2023. THE INITIAL REPORT WAS SUBMITTED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF AWARENESS OF THE EVENT BUT SINCE FILE NAME 3007593944-2023-00014 WAS A DUPLICATE, THE SUBMISSION FAILED. ASENSUS ATTEMPTED TO CORRECT THIS ADMINISTRATIVE ERROR, HOWEVER, THE SUBMISSION FAILED ACCORDING TO THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. THIS INITIAL REPORT, FILE NAME IS BEING RESUBMITTED TO CAPTURE THE INCIDENT UNDER THE CORRECT MFR REPORT NUMBER AND THIS SUBMISSION ALSO INCLUDES THE INVESTIGATION DETAILS.

Description of Event or Problem · 0

THE EVENT OCCURRED ON 10/11/2023 AND REPORTED TO ASENSUS ON 10/11/2023. THE EVENT DID NOT OCCUR WITHIN THE UNITED STATES. THE EVENT OCCURRED IN (B)(6), GERMANY. AS REPORTED BY THE COMPLAINANT, DURING A GYNECOLOGICAL PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE INSULATION FROM THE MONOPOLAR SCISSORS WAS NO LONGER INTACT. THE INSTRUMENT EMITTED SPARKING AND DELIVERED HEAT TO UNWANTED TISSUE AREAS. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED SINCE THE EVENT WAS NOTICED IN TIME AND THE PROCEDURE WAS CONVERTED TO TRADITIONAL LAPAROSCOPY DURING THE LAST SURGICAL STEPS TO AVOID ANY HARM TO THE PATIENT. NOTE- ADDITIONALLY, ASENSUS SUBMITTED (B)(4) WITH FILE NAME 3007593944-2023-00014 ON 31ST OCTOBER 2023. THE INITIAL REPORT WAS SUBMITTED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF AWARENESS OF THE EVENT BUT SINCE FILE NAME 3007593944-2023-00014 WAS A DUPLICATE, THE SUBMISSION FAILED. ASENSUS ATTEMPTED TO CORRECT THIS ADMINISTRATIVE ERROR, HOWEVER, THE SUBMISSION FAILED ACCORDING TO THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. THIS INITIAL REPORT, FILE NAME 3007593944-2023-00016, IS BEING RESUBMITTED TO CAPTURE THE INCIDENT UNDER THE CORRECT MFR REPORT NUMBER AND THIS SUBMISSION ALSO INCLUDES THE INVESTIGATION DETAILS.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
1885355 SENHANCE SENHANCE SURGICAL SYSTEM NAY ASENSUS SURGICAL, INC. X0007029 2141574 00815440020187

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 NA Female