FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR

MDR report key: 18222838 · Received November 28, 2023

Report

Report Number
2182207-2023-02607
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
November 28, 2023
Date of Event
September 9, 2022
Report Date
November 28, 2023
Manufacturer
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
Product Code
PJS
PMA / PMN Number
P960009
Adverse Event
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
IL, US
Reporter Occupation
PHYSICIAN
Health Professional
Yes

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS DATE IS BASED OFF OF THE DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THE ARTICLE AS THE EVENT DATES WERE NOT PROVIDED IN THE PUBLISHED LITERATURE. IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ASCERTAIN SPECIFIC DEVICE INFORMATION FROM THE ARTICLE OR TO MATCH THE EVENTS REPORTED WITH PREVIOUSLY REPORTED EVENTS. CORRESPONDENCE WILL BE SENT TO THE AUTHOR OF THE ARTICLE INQUIRING ABOUT INDIVIDUAL PATIENT INFORMATION AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE REPORTED EVENTS. MEDTRONIC IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT TO COMPLY WITH FDA REPORTING REGULATIONS UNDER 21 CFR PARTS 4 AND 803. THIS REPORT IS BASED UPON INFORMATION OBTAINED BY MEDTRONIC, WHICH THE COMPANY MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO FULLY INVESTIGATE OR VERIFY PRIOR TO THE DATE THE REPORT WAS REQUIRED BY THE FDA. MEDTRONIC HAS MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN MORE COMPLETE INFORMATION AND HAS PROVIDED AS MUCH RELEVANT INFORMATION AS IS AVAILABLE TO THE COMPANY AS OF THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THIS REPORT. THIS REPORT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ADMISSION OR A CONCLUSION BY FDA, MEDTRONIC, OR ITS EMPLOYEES THAT THE DEVICE, MEDTRONIC, OR ITS EMPLOYEE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT DESCRIBED IN THE REPORT. IN PARTICULAR, THIS REPORT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ADMISSION BY ANYONE THAT THE PRODUCT DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT HAS ANY ¿DEFECTS¿ OR HAS ¿MALFUNCTIONED¿. THESE WORDS ARE INCLUDED IN THE FDA 3500A FORM AND ARE FIXED ITEMS FOR SELECTION CREATED BY THE FDA TO CATEGORIZE THE TYPE OF EVENT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF REGULATORY REPORTING. MEDTRONIC OBJECTS TO THE USE OF THESE WORDS AND OTHERS LIKE THEM BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF DEFINITION AND THE CONNOTATIONS IMPLIED BY THESE TERMS. THIS STATEMENT SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH ANY INFORMATION OR REPORT DISCLOSED TO THE PUBLIC UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. ANY REQUIRED FIELDS THAT ARE UNPOPULATED ARE BLANK BECAUSE THE INFORMATION IS CURRENTLY UNKNOWN OR UNAVAILABLE. A GOOD FAITH EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO OBTAIN THE APPLICABLE INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE REPORT. IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

SEE ATTACHED LITERATURE ARTICLE. MEDTRONIC IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT TO COMPLY WITH FDA REPORTING REGULATIONS UNDER 21 CFR PARTS 4 AND 803. THIS REPORT IS BASED UPON INFORMATION OBTAINED BY MEDTRONIC, WHICH THE COMPANY MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO FULLY INVESTIGATE OR VERIFY PRIOR TO THE DATE THE REPORT WAS REQUIRED BY THE FDA. MEDTRONIC HAS MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN MORE COMPLETE INFORMATION AND HAS PROVIDED AS MUCH RELEVANT INFORMATION AS IS AVAILABLE TO THE COMPANY AS OF THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THIS REPORT. THIS REPORT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ADMISSION OR A CONCLUSION BY FDA, MEDTRONIC, OR ITS EMPLOYEES THAT THE DEVICE, MEDTRONIC, OR ITS EMPLOYEE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT DESCRIBED IN THE REPORT. IN PARTICULAR, THIS REPORT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ADMISSION BY ANYONE THAT THE PRODUCT DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT HAS ANY ¿DEFECTS¿ OR HAS ¿MALFUNCTIONED¿. THESE WORDS ARE INCLUDED IN THE FDA 3500A FORM AND ARE FIXED ITEMS FOR SELECTION CREATED BY THE FDA TO CATEGORIZE THE TYPE OF EVENT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF REGULATORY REPORTING. MEDTRONIC OBJECTS TO THE USE OF THESE WORDS AND OTHERS LIKE THEM BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF DEFINITION AND THE CONNOTATIONS IMPLIED BY THESE TERMS. THIS STATEMENT SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH ANY INFORMATION OR REPORT DISCLOSED TO THE PUBLIC UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. ANY REQUIRED FIELDS THAT ARE UNPOPULATED ARE BLANK BECAUSE THE INFORMATION IS CURRENTLY UNKNOWN OR UNAVAILABLE. A GOOD FAITH EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO OBTAIN THE APPLICABLE INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE REPORT. IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.

Description of Event or Problem · 0

SHEN, J., MARSILI, L., DWIVEDI, A.K. ET AL. DOES HEAD TREMOR PREDICT POSTURAL INSTABILITY AFTER BILATERAL THALAMIC STIMULATION IN ESSENTIAL TREMOR?. CEREBELLUM 22, 1039¿1044 (2023). HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1007/S12311-022-01477-2 ABSTRACT: ESSENTIAL TREMOR (ET) MAY PRESENT WITH HEAD TREMOR (HT), OF PRESUMED CEREBELLAR NATURE. DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION (DBS) TARGETING THE VENTRAL INTERMEDIATE (VIM) NUCLEUS OF THE THALAMUS IS A HIGHLY EFFECTIVE THERAPY FOR MEDICATION-REFRACTORY ET. HOWEVER, STIMULATION-RELATED SIDE EFFECTS MAY INCLUDE CEREBELLAR ABNORMALITIES, SUCH AS POSTURAL INSTABILITY. THIS RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY EVALUATED THE RISK OF POST-VIM DBS POSTURAL INSTABILITY (PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE) IN PATIENTS WITH VERSUS WITHOUT HEAD TREMOR (HT VS. NHT). THE PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE, NAMELY POST-DBS POSTURAL INSTABILITY, WAS ASSESSED IN BOTH GROUPS USING A WILCOXON RANK SUM T-TEST. THE TIME TO POSTURAL INSTABILITY WAS DETERMINED USING COX PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS REGRESSION ANALYSIS ADJUSTED FOR AGE AND SEX. OUT OF 30 PATIENTS ANALYZED DURING THE FOLLOW UP PERIOD, THERE WAS SIMILAR POSTURAL INSTABILITY DETECTED IN HT (9/14, 64%) AND NHT PATIENTS (11/16, 69%) AT 24 MONTHS POST-VIM DBS (P=0.82), ADJUSTED HAZARD RATIO[AHR]=0.82, P=0.69). THESE DATA SUGGEST THAT THE PRESENCE OR ABSENC E OF HT DOES NOT HAVE AN IMPACT ON POSTURAL INSTABILITY AFTER BILATERAL VIM DBS IN PATIENTS WITH ET. REPORTED EVENTS: ONE PATIENT HAD SEVERE CEREBROVASCULAR EVENT AND WAS EXCLUDED.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
532459 IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR ESSENTIAL TREMOR PJS MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION NEU_INS_STIMULATOR

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 Unknown Other