THE Q-TRAK SUBCUTANEOUS ELECTRODE
Report
- Report Number
- 2124215-2023-65989
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- November 21, 2023
- Date of Event
- April 1, 2023
- Report Date
- November 21, 2023
- Manufacturer
- OSCOR INC
- Product Code
- LWS
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- MA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
SHARMA, ESSEIM, ET AL. (2023) - APPROPRIATE INAPPROPRIATE SHOCKS: INAPPROPRIATE OVERSENSING DURING SLOW VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA IN A PATIENT WITH A SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR - HEART RHYTHM CASE REPORTS 2023;9:222-226 HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.HRCR.2022.12.020
IT WAS REPORTED PER ARTICLE OF INTEREST LITERATURE REVIEW THAT A 50-YEAR-OLD MAN WAS REFERRED FOR VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (VT) ABLATION FOR RECURRENT IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) SHOCKS. AN SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (S-ICD) WAS IMPLANTED AFTER APPROPRIATE PREIMPLANTATION SCREENING. THE PATIENT DID WELL FOR SEVEN YEARS AFTER HIS INITIAL S-ICD IMPLANTATION, UNTIL HE BEGAN DEVELOPING EPISODES OF SUSTAINED VT REQUIRING APPROPRIATE S-ICD SHOCKS. THESE EPISODES RESULTED IN A LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS, AND HE WAS NOT AWARE OF THE RESULTANT SHOCK. OVER THE COURSE OF THE NEXT FIVE MONTHS, HE HAD TWO SIMILAR EPISODES TO THIS DESPITE UP-TITRATION OF BETA-BLOCKER THERAPY, BOTH RESULTING IN ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATE ICD SHOCKS. THE PATIENT OPTED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH A VT ABLATION. PRIOR TO THE ABLATION, THE PATIENT'S S-ICD WAS DEACTIVATED. FIVE MONTHS AFTER THE ABLATION, HE AGAIN HAD RECURRENT MONOMORPHIC VT OF SIMILAR MORPHOLOGY AND CYCLE LENGTH TO HIS PRE-ABLATION ARRHYTHMIA, RESULTING IN AN APPROPRIATE SHOCK. HE WAS THEN BROUGHT IN FOR A REPEAT VT ABLATION, THIS TIME WITH AN ENDOCARDIAL AND EPICARDIAL APPROACH. IN THE RECOVERY AREA, THE PATIENT WAS NOTED TO HAVE FREQUENT RUNS OF SLOW VT AT AROUND 150 BEATS PER MINUTE. HE HAD SYMPTOMS OF PALPITATIONS BUT WAS OTHERWISE HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE AND AWAKE DURING THESE EPISODES. HOWEVER, HIS DEVICE WOULD DELIVER DEFIBRILLATION THERAPY FOR THESE EPISODES DESPITE BEING BELOW THE CONDITIONAL SHOCK ZONE. HIS DEVICE WAS DEACTIVATED WITH A MAGNET, AND INTERROGATION OF HIS DEVICE REVEALED DOUBLE-COUNTING OF THE QRS DURING THE VT, RESULTING IN THESE INAPPROPRIATE SHOCKS. HIS S-ICD WAS THEN EXTRACTED AND REPLACED WITH A SINGLE-CHAMBER TRANSVENOUS ICD. TWO MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION OF A TRANSVENOUS ICD, HE HAD RECURRENCE OF A FASTER VT, WHICH WAS SUCCESSFULLY TERMINATED WITH ANTI-TACHYCARDIA PACING. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 722820 | THE Q-TRAK SUBCUTANEOUS ELECTRODE | IMPLANTABLE LEAD | LWS | OSCOR INC |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 YR | Male | Required Intervention| H |