OT ULTRA2 METER
Report
- Report Number
- 2939301-2010-05736
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- July 18, 2010
- Date of Event
- July 12, 2010
- Report Date
- July 13, 2010
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN, INC.
- Product Code
- NBW
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
LIFESCAN (LFS) HAS REQUESTED RETURN OF THE SUBJECT PRODUCT(S) FOR EVALUATION. IF THE PRODUCT(S) ARE RETURNED, LFS WILL EVALUATE IT/THEM AND INFORM FDA OF PRODUCT(S) THAT DO NOT PASS INSPECTION IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT.
(B)(4). THE LAY USER/PATIENT'S PRODUCT(S) HAS BEEN RETURNED AND EVALUATED BY LIFESCAN PRODUCT ANALYSIS WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: THE METER INVOLVED IN THIS CASE FAILED TESTING. THE METER WAS FOUND TO HAVE A LOW/DEAD BATTERY. IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE, THE FDA WILL BE NOTIFIED IN A SECOND FOLLOW UP REPORT. AT THIS TIME, WE CONSIDER THIS MATTER CLOSED.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION PROCEDURE, THE JAWS ON DEVICE WERE DIFFICULT TO OPEN AND CLOSE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT.
ON (B)(6) 2010, THE LAY-USER/PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) (B)(4) ALLEGING A BATTERY INDICATOR ISSUE WITH A ONE TOUCH ULTRA 2 METER. THE PATIENT TESTS HER BLOOD GLUCOSE 3 TIMES A DAY. SHE TESTS BEFORE BREAKFAST, AND AFTER LUNCH AND DINNER. THE PATIENT REPORTED A METER READING OF "472 MG/DL." THE PATIENT MANAGES HER DIABETES WITH HUMULIN INSULIN TAKEN TWICE A DAY. THE PATIENT INDICATED THAT THE ALLEGED ISSUE STARTED ON AN UNSPECIFIED DATE/TIME A WEEK PRIOR TO CONTACTING LFS ON (B)(6) 2010. DUE TO THE ALLEGED ISSUE, THE PATIENT CLAIMED THAT SHE WAS UNABLE TO TEST HER BLOOD GLUCOSE WITH THE REPORTED LFS METER OR ANY OTHER DEVICE. DURING THAT TIME, THE PATIENT DID NOT MODIFY HER INSULIN REGIMEN BUT ATE LESS DUE TO HAVING A COLD. ABOUT A WEEK AFTER THE ALLEGED ISSUE BEGAN, THE PATIENT CLAIMED THAT SHE DEVELOPED SYMPTOMS OF DIZZINESS, THIRSTINESS, BLURRED VISION, AND SLEEPINESS. THE PATIENT COULD NOT RECALL WHAT HER LAST METER READING WAS BEFORE THE ALLEGED ISSUE BEGAN. THE PATIENT DENIED THAT SHE RECEIVED ANY TREATMENT BECAUSE OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE. THROUGH TROUBLESHOOTING, THE CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (CSR) DETERMINED THAT THE METER¿S BATTERY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE PATIENT DID NOT HAVE A REPLACEMENT BATTERY FOR TROUBLESHOOTING. THE METER AND TEST STRIPS WERE REPLACED. BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED DUE TO THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSION: THE PATIENT CLAIMED THAT SHE DEVELOPED SYMPTOMS THAT CAN BE ASSOCIATED WITH A SERIOUS INJURY AFTER THE ALLEGED ISSUE BEGAN.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OT ULTRA2 METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN, INC. | 2947144 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65 YR | Life Threatening |