MERCI RETRIEVER V 2.5 FIRM
Report
- Report Number
- 2954917-2010-00009
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- June 1, 2010
- Date of Event
- May 7, 2010
- Report Date
- June 1, 2010
- Manufacturer
- CONCENTRIC MEDICAL, INC.
- Product Code
- NRY
- PMA / PMN Number
- K081305
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- GA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF CONCENTRIC MEDICAL DEVICE MALFUNCTION AND THE DEVICE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE LIST RELATED POSSIBLE COMPLICATIONS. ALSO, WHILE THE USE OF THE CONCENTRIC MEDICAL DEVICES MAY HAVE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE PATIENT OUTCOME, THERE ARE OTHER FACTORS INDEPENDENT OF THE SUBJECT DEVICES (E.G., PATIENT FACTORS, DEVICE USE FACTORS, OTHER DEVICES EMPLOYED, DRUGS ADMINISTERED, ETC.) THAT ALSO MAY HAVE CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE OUTCOME.
PT WAS (B)(6) FEMALE FIRST SEEN ABOUT 2.5 HOURS AFTER STROKE SYMPTOM ONSET (NIHSS 10). SHE INITIALLY RECEIVE IV-TPA. ANGIOGRAPHY INDICATED TOTAL OCCLUSION OF THE RIGHT MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY (R-MCA) M1 BRANCH. AFTER THE FIRST PASS, CLOT WAS REMOVED AND TIMI-2 FLOW WAS OBTAINED IN THE DISTAL MCA TERRITORY. A FOLLOW-UP ANGIOGRAM AFTER A SECOND PASS REVEALED A POSSIBLE PERFORATION IN THE CAVERNOUS ICA, NO FLOW TO THE MCA, AND THE FORMATION OF A CAROTID-CAVERNOUS FISTULA (CCF) WHERE THE POSSIBLE PERFORATION OCCURRED. THE FOLLOWING DEVICES HAD PASSED THROUGH CAVERNOUS CAROTID ARTERY: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC TRANSEND EX SOFT TIP GUIDEWIRE, MICROCATHETER 18L, DISTAL ACCESS CATHETER 4.3F, AND RETRIEVER V 2.5 FIRM. WHILE CONSIDERING CCF TREATMENT OPTIONS, THE PHYSICIAN MADE A FEW MORE ANGIOGRAPHY RUNS. THERE WAS EXCELLENT CROSS FILLING TO THE R-MCA TERRITORY VIA THE LEFT SIDE CIRCULATION. ADDITIONALLY, AFTER SEVERAL MINUTES THERE WAS NOW RESTORED FLOW THROUGH THE R-ICA TO THE DISTAL TERRITORY. THE FLOW THROUGH THE CCF SEEMED SIGNIFICANTLY DIMINISHED BUT STILL PRESENT. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO CLOSELY MONITOR THE PATIENT. THE FOLLOWING DAY, THE PATIENT WAS ALERT AND HAD RESTORED MOVEMENT TO HER EXTREMITIES. THERE WERE SOME COMPLICATIONS TO THE RIGHT EYE AND THE DECISION WAS MADE TO PERFORM A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE TO TREAT THE CCF. IT WAS NOT CLEAR IF THE CCF WAS CAUSED BY PERFORATION DUE TO THE USE OF THE GUIDEWIRE, MICROCATHETER, DAC OR RETRIEVER.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MERCI RETRIEVER V 2.5 FIRM | CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS | NRY | CONCENTRIC MEDICAL, INC. | 90112 | UNKNOWN |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 YR | Required Intervention |