COBAS INTEGRA 800
Report
- Report Number
- 1823260-2010-02579
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- April 30, 2010
- Date of Event
- April 19, 2010
- Report Date
- September 16, 2010
- Manufacturer
- ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
- Product Code
- JJE
- PMA / PMN Number
- K951595
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CA
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
ONE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS PROVIDED FOR INVESTIGATION. VANCOMYCIN RECOVERIES USING THE INTEGRA 800, P MODULE, AND TDX VANCOMYCIN APPLICATIONS CORRELATED WELL WITH THE VANCOMYCIN RESULT OBTAINED BY THE CUSTOMER. THE SAMPLE WAS ADDITIONALLY TESTED FOR VANCOMYCIN BY LC/MS/MS METHODOLOGY WHICH GENERATED A HIGHER VANCOMYCIN RESULT THEN THE OTHER VANCOMYCIN IMMUNOASSAY APPLICATIONS. THIS DIFFERENCE IN RECOVERY MAY BE DUE TO AN INTERFERING SUBSTANCE OR FACTOR PRESENT IN THE PATIENT SAMPLE. FURTHER INVESTIGATION COULD NOT BE CARRIED OUT DUE TO INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE VOLUME. NO ADVERSE EVENTS WERE REPORTED.
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED REGARDING IMPACT TO THE PATIENT IN RELATION TO LOWERING OF THE VANCOMYCIN DOSAGE. "AS OF NOW, WE ARE NOT AWARE OF ANY ADVERSE EVENTS DUE TO LOWERING OF DOSE OR INCREASING THE INTERVAL BETWEEN DOSES OF VANCOMYCIN TO THE PATIENT". THE INVESTIGATION IS ONGOING.
IT IS UNKNOWN IF INITIAL REPORTER SENT REPORT TO FDA.
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED INDICATING THE PHYSICIANS HAVE BEEN LOWERING THE PATIENT'S VANCOMYCIN DOSAGE. NO INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED REGARDING IMPACT TO THE PATIENT IN RELATION TO THE LOWERING OF THE VANCOMYCIN DOSAGE. THE INVESTIGATION IS ONGOING. THE VANCOMYCIN REAGENT LOT NUMBER WAS 620666.
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT DURING PREPARATION FOR A SACROSPINOUS FIXATION PROCEDURE TO REPAIR VAGINAL PROLAPSE USING A CAPIO OPEN ACCESS SUTURE CAPTURING DEVICE, THE NURSE SUCCESSFULLY LOADED THE SIZE 0 CAPIO SUTURE (MANUFACTURED BY TELEFLEX MEDICAL INC, DISTRIBUTED BY BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION) INTO THE CAPIO DEVICE. HOWEVER, WHEN THE SUTURE WAS THROWN, THE CAPIO CAGE FAILED TO CATCH THE NEEDLE ATTACHED TO THE SUTURE. THE CAPIO DEVICE REPORTEDLY DID NOT COME IN CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE CAPIO DEVICE WAS NOT LABELED WITH AN EXPIRY DATE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER CAPIO OPEN ACCESS SUTURE CAPTURING DEVICE WITHOUT ANY COMPLICATIONS TO THE PATIENT, WHO IS REPORTEDLY DOING "ABSOLUTELY FINE" POST-PROCEDURE.
ON (B)(6) 2010, THE LAY USER/PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN TO REPORT THE ONE TOUCH ULTRA 2 METER WAS GIVING INACCURATELY ERRATIC READINGS. THE SR. MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE SPECIALIST WAS ABLE TO CLASSIFY THE COMPLAINT BASED ON THE INFORMATION ORIGINALLY PROVIDED. FOR APPROXIMATELY SIX MONTHS, THE PATIENT HAD OBTAINED BLOOD GLUCOSE READINGS ON THE REPORTED METER THAT SHE CLAIMED WERE INACCURATELY ERRATIC, SUCH AS 70 MG/DL AND 200 MG/DL. DURING THIS TIME PERIOD, THE PATIENT MANAGED HER DIABETES WITH INSULIN TAKEN ON A SLIDING SCALE. ON (B)(6) 2010 AT 1:00 AM, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED THE SYMPTOMS OF COLD SWEATS AND TINGLING LEGS. THE PATIENT DID NOT SEEK ANY MEDICAL ATTENTION OR TREATMENT. TROUBLESHOOTING REVEALED THE PATIENT'S TEST STRIPS WERE EXPIRED, AND THE METER WAS NOT PROGRAMMED FOR THE CORRECT CALIBRATION CODE NUMBER, BOTH OF WHICH CAN CAUSE INACCURATE READINGS. THE METER, TEST STRIPS AND CONTROL SOLUTION WERE REPLACED. THE PATIENT USED EXPIRED TEST STRIPS TO TEST HER BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVELS. THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY SUFFERED SYMPTOMS SUGGESTING SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA AFTER SHE TOOK INSULIN BASED ON BLOOD GLUCOSE READINGS FROM THE REPORTED METER. THEREFORE THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED.
A CUSTOMER RECEIVED DISCREPANT VANCOMYCIN RESULTS FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE. INITIAL RESULT GAVE 35.4 MG/L. REPEAT TESTING WAS PERFORMED AT ANOTHER FACILITY ON (B) (6) 2010 ON A BECKMAN ANALYZER GIVING A RESULT OF 20.7 MG/L. THE CUSTOMER SAID THE BECKMAN VANCOMYCIN RESULT CORRELATES BETTER WITH PATIENTS CLINICAL SITUATION. INITIAL RESULT WAS REPORTED. NO INFORMATION PROVIDED IF PATIENT WAS ADVERSELY AFFECTED. .
REPORTEDLY, THE DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED AT IMPLANT BECAUSE ¿IT DIDN¿T LOOK RIGHT.¿ REPORT RECEIVED FROM (B) (4) SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA TELEPHONE. HE WAS NOTIFIED ON THE 11TH OF MAY THAT AN EXPLANT HAD TAKEN PLACE. HIS CONVERSATION WAS WITH THE NURSE, NURSE STATED THAT SURGEON EXPLANTED THE VALVE BECAUSE ¿IT DIDN¿T LOOK RIGHT ¿ THE LEAFLETS DIDN¿T LOOK RIGHT.¿ NO TEE WAS DONE AS THIS WAS ALL BEFORE ANY TESTING. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE EVENT WAS PROVIDED. SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAS NOT TALKED TO THE SURGEON AS HE IS ON VACATION BUT WILL TALK TO HIM NEXT WEEK. DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | COBAS INTEGRA 800 | CLINICAL CHEMISTRY ANALYZER | JJE | ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS | NA | NA |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 057 YR | VANCOMYCIN |