FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

NONE

MDR report key: 1654916 · Received April 6, 2010

Report

Report Number
2916710-2010-00031
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
April 6, 2010
Date of Event
May 9, 2005
Report Date
March 9, 2010
Product Code
IYE
PMA / PMN Number
UNK
Adverse Event
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
TN, US
Reporter Occupation
UNKNOWN

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

THE REPORT DID NOT IDENTIFY A VARIAN DEVICE NAME AND/OR MODEL NUMBER. FURTHER INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THAT THE TREATMENT CENTER IS EQUIPPED WITH VARIAN PRODUCT. HOWEVER, WE HAVE NO REPORT OF A PRODUCT MALFUNCTION ON FILE DURING THE TIME FRAME MENTIONED IN THE PATIENT'S REPORT. VARIAN HAS DETERMINED THAT A MDR IS APPROPRIATE BASED ON THE PATIENT'S ALLEGATION OF RADIATION BURNS. (B) (4).

Description of Event or Problem · 1

VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS RECEIVED A LETTER FROM A PATIENT THAT RECEIVED RADIATION TREATMENT TO THE HEAD AND NECK IN (B) (6), FROM (B) (6) 2005 TO (B) (6) 2005. THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE TONGUE. THE LETTER ALLEGES THE PATIENT RECEIVED 6,600 CGY IN 33 FRACTIONS TO THE ORAL TONGUE WITH 4,600 CGY TO THE CERVICAL AND SUPRACLAVICULAR LYMPH NODES. IN 2007, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE PROXIMAL ESOPHAGUS WAS MARKEDLY NARROWED DUE TO SCARRING (DOWN TO 5-6MM PER THE OPERATIVE REPORT). PEG TUBE AND ESOPHAGEAL DILATATIONS ARE REQUIRED ABOUT EVERY SIX MONTHS. THE ENT (EAR, NOSE AND THROAT) PHYSICIAN COULD NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THERE WAS SEVERE SCARRING AS THE RADIATION DOSAGE REPORTED SEEMED APPROPRIATE. THE PATIENT INDICATED IN THE REPORT THAT AFTER READING SEVERAL NEWS ARTICLES REFERRING TO VARIAN'S EQUIPMENT, THE PATIENT BELIEVES THAT SHE HAS AN EXPLANATION FOR HER ADVERSE REACTION FOLLOWING TREATMENT. NO FURTHER PATIENT INFORMATION WAS SUPPLIED.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
1 NONE IYE

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 Required Intervention